Towards an education behavioral intention model for e-learning systems: An extension of UTAUT

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1200-1207

  Lin, Peng Chun ^a   Lu, Hsin Ke ^a   Liu, Shang Chia ^b  

^a CHINESE CULTURE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b FU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Behavioral intention model; E learning system; Individual difference; Learning styles; Teaching styles; UTAUT

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876021758     PISSN: 19928645     EISSN: 18173195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M.Y. (2008). A study of students' perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183-193.
2. Ashley, B. J., Cohen, H. S., & Slatter, R. G. (1969). An Introduction to the Sociology of Education. London: Macmillan.
3. Blaylock, B.K., and L.P. Rees (1984). Cognitive Style and The Usefulness of Information. Decision Sciences, 15, 74-91.
4. Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L. and SeinM. K. (1990). The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training. MIS Quarterly, 101-119.
5. Chen, Y.-F., Chen, H.-Z., Tseng, S.-C., & Kuo, B.-C. (2007). Measurements of teaching styles for computering teachers. Paper presented at the 2007 National computer symposium, Taipei.
6. David Gefen, and Detmar, W. Straub (1997). Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Techonology Acceptance Model. MIS Quareterly, 21(4), 384-400.
7. Davis, F. D. (1989a). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and end-user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 318-339.
8. Davis, F. D. (1989b). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
9. Farida U-K, and Sridhar I(2009). ELAM: A Model for Acceptance and Use of E-learning by Teachers and Students. International Conference on e-learning (ICEL), Toronto, Canada.
10. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, ASCE, 78(7), 674-681.
11. Fischer, B. B. and Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in Teaching and Learning. Educational Leadership, 36,245-254.
12. Franzoni, A., & Assar, S. (2007). Using Learning Styles to enhance an e-Learning System. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on e-Learning, Copenhagen, Denmark: Academic conference management, 235-244.
13. Franzoni, A. L., and Assar, S. (2009). Student Learning Styles Adaptation Method Based on Teaching Strategies and Electronic Media. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 15-29.
14. Getzels, J. W., & Thelen, H. A. (1972). A conceptual framework for the study of the classroom group as a social system. In A. Morrison & D. Mcintyre (Eds.), The Social Psychology of teaching. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.
15. Goodhue, D. (1986) IS Attitudes: Towards Theoretical Definition and Measurement Clarity. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, San Diego, 181-194.
16. Graf, S., Liu, T.C., & Kinshuk (2010). Analysis of learners' navigational behaviour and their learning styles in an online course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 116-131.
17. Grasha, A. F. (1994). A matter of style: The Teacher as Expert, Formal Authority, Personal Model, Facilitator, and Delegator. College Teaching, 42(4), 142-149.
18. Grasha, A. F. (2010). A Grasha-Riechmann Teaching Style Survey. Retrieved Dec. 1, 2010, from http://www.longleaf.net/teachingstyle.html
19. Kraft, A. (1975). The Living Classroom. Putting Humanistic Education into Practice. New York: Harper & Row.
20. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
21. Lewin, K., Liippit, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301.
22. Lin, P.C., Lu, H. K., Lo, C. H. (2012). Exploring the impact of perceived teaching style on behavioral intention toward E-learning systems. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Thailand.
23. Littlewood, W., Liu, N-F. & Yu, C. (1996). Hong Kong tertiary students' attitudes and proficiency in spoken English. RELC Journal, 27(1), 70-88.
24. Lovelace, M. K. (2005). Meta-analysis of experimental research based on the Dunn and Dunn model. The Journal of Education Research, 98(3), 176-183.
25. Lu, H.K. (2012). Learning Styles and Acceptance of e-Learning Management Systems: An Extension of Behaviour Intention Model. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation. Proceeding.
26. Lu, H.K., & Lin, P.C.(2012). Toward an extended behavioral intention model for e-learning: Using learning and teaching styles as individual differences. 2012 Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet) International Conference, 3673-3676.
27. Marie-Christine Opdenakker, J. V. D. (2006). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 1-21.
28. Moran, M., Hawkes, M., & El Gayar, O. (2010). Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(1), 79-101.
29. Ogden, W. R. (2003). Reaching all the students: The feedback lecture. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(1), 22-27.
30. Onur, J. (2008). A study of the effects on teaching methods and teaching styles of converging national and international curricula at the Koc School.
31. Provitera, M. J., & Esendal, E. (2008). Learning and teaching styles in management education: Identifying, analyzing, and facilitating. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 69-78.
32. Razak, N.A., Ahmad, F., & Shah, P.M. (2007). Perceived and preferred teaching styles (methods) of english for specific purposes (ESP) Students. Jurnal e-Bangi, 2(2), 1-20.
33. Sabeh, G., Bahous, R., Bacha, N.N. and Nabhani, M(2011). A Match or a Mismatch between Student and Teacher Learning Style Preference, International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1), 162-172
34. sykes., T. A., Venkatesh, V., and Gosain, S. (2009). Model of Acceptance with Peep Support: A Social Network Perspective to inderstand employee' System Use. MIS Quartery, 33(2), 371-393.
35. Van Raaij, E. M., and Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838-852.
36. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. (2003) "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View", MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
37. Wang, Y.-S., Wu, M.-C., & Wang, H.-Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118.