Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review

Technology, Pedagogy and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 295-314

  Lawson, Tony ^a   Comber, Chris ^a   Gage, Jenny ^b   Cullum Hanshaw, Adrian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Authentic learning; Distance education; Interactive learning; Pedagogy; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956951221     PISSN: 1475939X     EISSN: 17475139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2010.513761     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Abbott, C., Grosbois, M., & Klein, M. (2005). A beautiful house built on sand: What makes ecommunication projects succeed and why are they so rare? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 225-239.
2. Abbott, L., Austin, R., Mulkeen, A., & Metcalfe, N. (2005). The global classroom: Advancing cultural awareness in special schools through collaborative work using ICT. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 225-240.
3. Abbott, L., Dallat, J., Livingston, R., & Robinson, A. (1994). The application of videoconferencing to the advancement of independent group learning for professional development. Educational and Training Technology International, 31(2), 85-92.
4. Admiraal, W., Veen, W., Korthagen, F., Lockhorst, D., Wubbels, T., Hernadez, F., Fonollosa, M., Grisos, A., McShea, J., Bennett, N., Davis, N., Jennings, S., Gudmundsdottir S., & Hoel, T. (1999). Tele-guidance to develop reflective practice: Experiences in four teacher education programmes across Europe. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 8, 71-88.
5. Al-Kodmany, K.G., Marks, R.V., & Skach, J. (1999). A case study of teaching an urban design course on two campuses simultaneously. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from ALN Magazine: http://www.aln.org/publications/magazine/v3n1/alkodmany.asp
6. Allen, M., Sargeant, J., Med, B.N., Mann, K., Fleming, M., & Premi, J. (2003). Videoconferencing for practice-based small-group continuing medical education: Feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and cost. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Profession, 23, 38-47.
7. 1 for K-12 distance education? Journal of Distance Education, 22, 109-124.
8. Andrews, T., & Klease, G. (1998). Challenges of multisite video conferencing: The development of an alternative teaching/learning model. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 88-97.
9. Andrews, T., & Klease, G. (2002). Extending learning opportunities through a virtual faculty The videoconference option. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3, 1-11.
10. Arnold, T., Cayley, S., & Griffith, M. (2002). Video conferencing in the classroom: Communications technology across the curriculum. Exeter: Devon County Council.
11. Austin, R., Abbott, L., Mulkeen, A., & Metcalfe, N. (2003). Dissolving boundaries: Crossnational co-operation through technology in education. The Curriculum Journal, 14, 55-84.
12. Bates, A. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
13. Belderrain, Y. (2006). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27, 139-154.
14. Bello, A.D., Knowlton, E., & Chaffin, J. (2007). Interactive videoconferencing as a medium for special education: Knowledge acquisition in pre-service teacher education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 38-47.
15. Berge, Z.L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education 1990 to 1999. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), 5-19.
16. Bollom, C.E., Emerson, P.A., Fleming, P.R., & Williams, A.R. (1989). The Charing Cross and Westminster Interactive Television Network. Journal of Educational Television, 15, 5-15.
17. Bunzel, M.J., & Morris, S.K. (1994). Multimedia applications development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Burns, J. (2002). Evaluating staff development and training models to support the implementation of videoconferencing technology in a distributed university. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3, 327-340.
19. Butler, M., & Fawkes, S. (1999). Videoconferencing for language learners. Language Learning Journal, 19, 46-49.
20. Cárdenas, K. (1998). Technology in today's classroom: It slices and it dices, but does it serve us well? Academe, 84(3), 27-29.
21. Carter, C., Clarke, A., Graham, R., & Pomfrett, S. (1996). The use of video conferencing in higher education. New York: SIMA Report Series.
22. Carville, S., & Mitchell, D.R. (2000). 'It's a bit like Star Trek': The effectiveness of video conferencing innovations. Education and Training International, 37, 42-49.
23. Cavanaugh, C.S. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Technologies, 7, 73-88.
24. Cifuentes, L., & Murphy, K.L. (2000). Promoting multicultural understanding and positive self-concept through a distance learning community: Cultural connections. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 42-49.
25. Cochrane, C. (1996). The use of videoconferencing to support learning: An overview of issues relevant to the library and information profession. Education for Information, 14, 317-330.
26. Cole, C., Ray, K., & Zanetis, J. (2004). Videoconferencing for K12 classrooms: A program development guide. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
27. Collis, B., Peters, O., & Pals, N. (2000). Influences on the educational use of the www, email and videoconferencing. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 108-119.
28. Comber, C., Lawson, T., Gage, J., Cullum-Hanshaw, A., & Allen, T. (2004). Evaluation for the DfES Videoconferencing in the Classroom Project. Coventry: Becta. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from Becta website: http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/ page_documents/research/video_conferencing_final_report_may04.pdf
29. Coyle, D. (2004). Redefining classroom boundaries: Learning to teach using new technologies. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 32: http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/pdf_files/coyle.pdf
30. Creighton, J.L., & Adams, J.W.R. (1998). CyberMeeting. New York: American Management Association.
31. Darabi, A., Sikorski, E., & Harvey, R. (2006). Validated competencies for distance teaching. Distance Education, 27, 105-122.
32. Deadman, P., Hall, G.B., Bain, T., Elliot, L., & Dudycha, D. (2000). Interactive GIS instruction using a multimedia classroom. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24, 365-380.
33. Department for Education and Skills. (2004). International strategy for education: Putting the 'world' into world class education. London: Author.
34. Doggett, A.M. (2008). The videoconference classroom: What do students think? Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 44(4), 29-41.
35. Dyke, M., Harding, A., & Liddon, S. (2008). How can online observation support the assessment and feedback, on classroom performance, to trainees teachers at a distance and in real time? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32, 37-46.
36. Eales, R.T.J., & Bryd, L.M. (1997). Virtually deschooling society: Authentic collaborative learning via the internet. In S. Lobodzinski & I. Tomek (Eds.), Proceedings of WebNet 97 World Conference on the WWW, Internet & Intranet, Toronto, Canada, November 1-5, 1997 (pp. 155-160). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
37. Eales, R.T.J., Neale, D.C., & Carroll, J.M. (1999). Desktop videoconferencing as a basis for computer supported collaborative learning in K-12 classrooms. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference in Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 1999, 1, (pp. 628-633). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
38. Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers and Education, 47, 298-315.
39. Ertl, B., Reiserer, M., & Mandl, H. (2005). Fostering collaborative learning in videoconferencing: The influence of content schemes and collaboration scripts on collaboration outcomes and individual learning outcomes. Education, Communication and Information, 5, 147-166.
40. Falconer, K.B., & Lignugaris-Kraft, B. (2002). A qualitative analysis of the benefits and limitations of using two-way conferencing technology to supervise pre-service teachers in remote locations. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 368-384.
41. Fowler, H. (1997, November 26 December 9). Videoconferencing Tool or toy? Information Week, 18, 26-37.
42. Freeman, M. (1998). Video conferencing: A solution to the multi-campus large classes problem? British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 197-201.
43. Fritze, Y., & Nordkvelle, Y.T. (2003). Comparing lectures: Effects of the technological context of the studio. Education and Information Technologies, 8, 327-343.
44. Furst-Bowe, J.A. (1997). Comparison of student reactions in traditional and videoconferencing courses. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24(3), 197-205.
45. Gage, J. (2001). What does MOTIVATE do? Micromath, 17(2), 22-25.
46. Gage, J. (2003). Videoconferencing in the mathematics lesson. Coventry: Becta.
47. Gage, J., Nickson, M., & Beardon, T. (2002, September). Can videoconferencing contribute to teaching and learning?: The experience of the Motivate Project. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, UK. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from University of Leeds website: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/ educol/documents/00002264.htm
48. Galton, M., Comber, C., Fogelman, K., Hargreaves, L., Lawson, T., Thorpe, R., et al. (1998). Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative: Group A: Curriculum projects in England and Wales: Final report. Coventry: National Council for Educational Technology.
49. Gerstein, R.B. (2000). Videoconferencing in the classroom: Special projects towards cultural understanding. In D.L. Johnson, C.D. Maddux, & L. Liu (Eds.), Integration of technology in the classroom: Case studies (pp. 177-186). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
50. Gibbs, D., & Gosper, M. (2006). The upside-down world of e-learning. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 46-54.
51. Gillies, D. (2008). Student perspectives on videoconferencing in teacher education at a distance. Distance Education, 29, 107-118.
52. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. New York: Little, Brown.
53. Global Leap (2003). Case studies Global-leap.com. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http:// www.global-leap.com/casestudies/book/index.htm
54. Goddard, J. (1995). Perspectives on video conferencing ASCILITE'95 Learning with technology. Melbourne: Science Multimedia Teaching Unit.
55. Harris, S. (2002). Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 449-458.
56. Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., et al. (2002). ImpaCT2: The impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment. London: Department for Education and Skills/Becta.
57. Hearnshaw, D. (1998). Capitalising on the strengths and availability of desktop videoconferencing. Active Learning, 7, 52-59.
58. Hearnshaw, D. (2000). Towards an objective approach to the evaluation of videoconferencing. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 210-217.
59. Heath, M.J., & Holznagel, D. (2002, August). Interactive videoconferencing: A literature review. Paper presented at a meeting of the K-12 National Symposium for Interactive Videoconferencing, Dallas, TX.
60. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. (1993). Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
61. Herrington, A., & Bunker, A. (2002). Quality teaching online: Putting pedagogy first. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from Global Leap website: http://www.global-leap.com/casestudies/index.htm
62. Hooper, S., Miller, C., Rose, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2007). The effects of digital quality on learner comprehension in an American Sign Language assessment environment. Sign Language Studies, 8, 42-58.
63. Hu, C., Sharpe, L., Crawford, L., Gopinathan, S., Khine, M.S., Moo S.N., et al. (2000). Using lesson video clips via multipoint desktop video conferencing to facilitate reflective practice. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 377-388.
64. Husu, J. (2000). Supporting remote communities with a shared virtual classroom: A view of social contexts. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9, 255-267.
65. Jacobs, G., & Rodgers, C. (1997). Remote teaching with digital video: A trans-national experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 293-304.
66. JANET Videoconferencing Service. (2009). School videoconferencing: National statistics. Retrieved June 18, 2009, from http://www.ja.net/communities/schools/videoconferencing/ statistics.html
67. John, P., & Sutherland, R. (2005). Affordance, opportunity and pedagogical implications of ICT. Educational Review, 57, 405-413.
68. Jones, S.P., & Smart, K.J. (1998). Humanness under assault: An essay questioning technology in the classroom. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 18(2), 87-95.
69. Kerka, S. (1996). Distance learning, the internet and the worldwide web. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse.
70. Kies, J.K., Williges, R.C., & Rosson, M.B. (1997). Evaluating desktop video conferencing for distance learning. Computers in Education, 28(2), 79-91.
71. Kinginger, C. (1998). Videoconferencing as access to spoken French. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 502-513.
72. Kinnear, H., McWilliams, S., & Caul, L. (2002). The use of interactive video in teaching teachers: An evaluation of a link with a primary school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 17-26.
73. Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 301-311.
74. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. London: Prentice Hall.
75. Kristiansen, T. (1994). ISDN video telephony in Norway. In R. Mason & P. Bacsich (Eds.), ISDN: Applications in education and training (pp. 115-126). Exeter: Short Run Press.
76. Laouénan, M., & Stacey, S. (1999). A brief experiment in distance teaching and learning of French. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 177-180.
77. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
78. Lawrence, B.H. (1995-1996). Teaching and learning via video conference: The benefits of cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24, 145-149.
79. Lawson, T., & Comber, C. (2005). Effective videoconferencing in the classroom: Summary report for six case studies. Coventry: Becta. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/vc_case_studies_ summary_report.pdf
80. Lee, M.M. (2007). 'Making it relevant': A rural teacher's integration of an international studies program. Intercultural Education, 18, 147-159.
81. Manley, J. (2002). Videoconferencing market report. Hampton: Keynote.
82. Manley, M. (2007). Videoconferencing market report. Hampton: Keynote.
83. Martin, M. (2005). Seeing is believing: The role of videoconferencing in distance learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 397-405.
84. Mason, R. (1994). The educational value of ISDN. In R. Mason & P. Bacsich (Eds.), ISDN: Applications in education and training (pp. 25-38). Exeter: Short Run Press.
85. Mason, R. (1998). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. London: Kogan Page.
86. Molnar, A. (1997). Computers in education: A brief history. THE Journal, 24(11), 63-68.
87. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.
88. Mykytyn, I. (1999). A practical guide to videoconferencing. Glasgow: Scottish Council for Educational Technology.
89. National Council for Educational Technology. (1996). Information sheet on teacher training and computer mediated communications. Coventry: Author.
90. National Council for Educational Technology. (1997). Education Departments' Superhighways Initiative. Coventry: Author. Retrieved June 10, 2009, from Becta website: http:// partners. becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&catcode=_re_rp_02_a&rid=13686&pagenum=3&NextStart=1
91. Noll, A.M. (1997). Highway of dreams: A critical view along the information superhighway. Philadelphia: Lawrence Erlbaum.
92. Norman, N. (1997). Communication technologies and education: Lessons in the potential of innovation. ALT-J, 5(3), 1-9.
93. Noss, R., & Pachler, N. (1999). The challenge of new technologies: Doing old things in a new way, or doing new things? In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning (pp. 195-211). London: Paul Chapman.
94. Offir, B., & Lev, Y. (1999). Teacher-learner interaction in the process of operating DL systems. Educational Media International, 36, 132-136.
95. Oliver, R., & McLoughlin, C. (1997). Interaction in audiographics teaching and learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 6-22.
96. Olsen, F. (2003). Videoconferencing with some life in it. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(43), A24-A25.
97. Pachnowski, L.M. (2002). Virtual field trips through videoconferencing. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(6), 10-13.
98. Pacific Bell. (1995). Videoconferencing for learning. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http:// www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/vidconf/
99. Payne, F., Gooday, M., Coutts, N., Duncan, A., & Wolfe, A. (2006, November). The use of videoconferencing for learning and teaching: Evaluation of the Global Learning and International Classroom Project. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Scottish Educational Research Association, Perth. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http:// www.sera.ac.uk/docs/2006/Programme2006final.pdf.
100. Pitcher, N., Davidson, K., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Videoconferencing in higher education. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(3), 199-209.
101. Poscente, K., Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2006). Perceptions of an impending high speed, broadband network: Anticipation and anxiety among K-12 teachers, technical support personnel and administrators. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 3, 24-36.
102. Pratt, N. (2008). Multi-point e-conferencing with initial teacher training students in England: Pitfalls and potential. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1476-1486.
103. Pratt, N. (2008). Using multipoint conferencing with teaching students: Balancing technological potential with practical challenges. In R. Donnelly & F. McSweeney (Eds.), Applied e-learning and e-teaching in higher education (pp. 289-308). New York: Information Science Publishing.
104. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Rogers, D., & Jones, C. (1999). Partnership learning: New models of videoconferencing in education. In J.D. Price, J. Willis, D.E. Willis, M. Jost, & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 1999, 1, (pp. 188-192). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
106. Rummel, N., Spada, H., Hermann, F., Caspar, F., & Schornstein, K. (2002). Promoting the coordination of computer-mediated interdisciplinary collaboration. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 558-559). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
107. Salmon, G. (1999). Computer mediated conferencing in large scale management education. Open Learning, 14(2), 34-43.
108. Salmon, G. (2002). Mirror, mirror, on my screen. Exploring online reflections. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 379-391.
109. Salmon, G. (2005). Flying, not flapping: A strategic framework for e-learning and pedagogical innovation in higher education. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 13, 201-218.
110. Saw, K.G., Majid, O., Ghani, N.A., Atan, H., Idrus, R.M., Rahman, Z.A., et al. (2008). The videoconferencing learning environment: Technology, interaction and learning intersect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 475-485.
111. Schiller, J., & Mitchell, J. (1993). Interacting at a distance: Staff and student perceptions of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 41-58.
112. Schweizer, K., Paechter, M., & Weidenmann, B. (2003). Blended learning as a strategy to improve collaborative task performance. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 211-224.
113. Scrum, L. (1996). Teaching at a distance: Strategies for successful planning and development. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(6), 30-33.
114. Sharpe, L., Hu, C., Crawford, L., Gopinathan, S., Khine M.S., & Moo, S.N. (2003). Enhancing multipoint desktop videoconferencing (MDVC) with lesson video clips: Recent developments in pre-service teaching practice in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 529-541.
115. Sharpe, L., Hu, C., Crawford, L., Gopinathan, S., Moo, S.N., & Wong, A.F.L. (2000). Multipoint desktop videoconferencing as a collaborative tool for teacher preparation. Educational Technology, 40(5), 61-63.
116. Sharpe, L., Moo, S.N., Crawford, L., & Gopinathan, S. (1994). Teacher supervision: Patterns of discourse. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
117. Siemans, G. (2005). A learning theory for the digital age. Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 2, 3-10.
118. Smyth, R. (2004). Exploring the usefulness of a conceptual framework as a research tool: A researcher's reflections. Issues in Educational Research, 14, 167-180.
119. Smyth, R. (2005). Broadband videoconferencing as a tool for learner-centred distance learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 805-820.
120. Smyth, W., & Fay, J. (1994). Video conferencing between schools in Northern Ireland and schools in France. Antrim: North Eastern Education and Library Board.
121. Somekh, B. (2004). Taking the sociological imagination to school: An analysis of the (lack of) impact of information and communication technologies on education systems. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 163-180.
122. Southwick, J.W. (2003). Distance education in the rural K-12 environment. In M. Corry & C.-H. Tu (Eds.), Distance education: What works well, volume 20 (pp. 27-59). Abingdon: Routledge.
123. Squire, K.D., & Johnson, C.B. (2000). Supporting distributive communities of practice with interactive television. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 23-43.
124. Storck, J., & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in videoconferences? Human Communication Research, 22, 197-219.
125. Tang, J.C., & Isaacs, E.A. (1995). Studies in multimedia-supported collaboration. In S.J. Emmott (Ed.), Information super highways (pp. 123-160). New York: Academic Press.
126. Thorpe, R. (1998). The use of personal video conferencing with special needs pupils from three schools serving rural areas: A case of successful adoption of new technology. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 7, 395-412.
127. Tiffin, J., & Rajasingham, L. (1995). In search of the virtual classroom: Education in an information society. London: Routledge.
128. Tyler, C. (1999). Beyond the content Videoconferencing as a learning experience. Speaking English, 32(2), 15-27.
129. Watson, A., & Sasse, M.A. (1998, September). Measuring perceived quality of speech and video in multimedia conferencing applications. In W. Effelsberg & B.C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia'98 (pp. 55-60). Bristol: ACM.
130. Wheeler, S. (2000). User reactions to videoconferencing: Which students cope best? Education Media International, 37, 31-38.
131. Wright, N., & Cordeaux, C. (1996). Rethinking videoconferencing: Lessons learned from initial teacher education. Innovations in Education and Training International, 33(4), 194-202.
132. Wright, N., & Whitehead, M. (1998). Video-conferencing and GCSE oral practice. Language Learning Journal, 18, 47-49.
133. Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers and Education, 52, 820-833.
134. Yang, S.G., & Chen, Y.-J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 860-879.
135. Yost, N. (2001). Lights, camera, action: Videoconferencing in the kindergarten. In J. Price, D.A. Willis, N. Davis & J. Willis (Eds.), Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001, 1, (pp. 3173-3175). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.