Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research

Journal of Management Information Systems

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 9-54

  Brown, Susan ^a   Dennis, Alan ^b   Venkatesh, Viswanath ^c  

^a MIS   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

channel expansion theory; collaboration technologies; social presence theory; task closure model; technology acceptance; technology adoption; unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Indexed keywords

EXPANSION;

CHANNEL EXPANSIONS; CLOSURE MODELS; COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL PRESENCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 78649372992     PISSN: 07421222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Aiken, L.S., and West, S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage, 1996.
2. ATK earney. Mobinet 2005. London, October 2005 (available at www.atkearney.com/images/global/pdf/Mobinet-2005-Detailed-Results.pdf ).
3. Bajwa, D.S.; Lewis, L.F.; Pervan, G.; and Lai, V.S. The adoption and use of collaboration information technologies: International comparisons. Journal of Information Technology, 20, 2 (June 2005), 130-140.
4. Bajwa, D.S.; Lewis, L.F.; Pervan, G.; Lai, V.S.; Munkvoldm, B.E.; and Schwabe, G. Factors in the global assimilation of collaborative information technologies: An exploratory investigation in five regions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 1 (Summer 2008), 131-165.
5. Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6 (1986), 1173-1182.
6. Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R.W. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the disciplines core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27, 2 (June 2003), 183-194.
7. Brown, S.A., and Venkatesh, V. Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29, 3 (September 2005), 399-426.
8. Brown, S.A.; Fuller, R.; and Vician, C. Whos afraid of the virtual world? The role of anxiety in computer-mediated communication use and satisfaction. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 2 (February 2004), 81-109.
9. Brown, S.A.; Massey, A.P.; Montoya-Weiss, M.; and Burkman, J. Do I really have to? Understanding technology acceptance when use is mandatory. European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 4 (December 2002), 283-295.
10. Burton-Jones, A., and Gallivan, M.J. Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (December 2007), 657-679.
11. Carlson, J.R., and Zmud, R.W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 2 (April 1999), 153-170.
12. Chin, W.Y.W. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 295-336.
13. Christie, B. Human Factors of Information Technology in the Office. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.
14. Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6, 2 (June 1995), 118-143.
15. Compeau, D.R., and Higgins, C.A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 2 (June 1995), 189-211.
16. Daft, R.L., and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (May 1986), 554-571.
17. Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; and Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 8 (August 1989), 982-1002.
18. Dennis, A.R., and Gallupe, R.B. A history of GSS empirical research: Lessons learned and future directions. In L.M. Jessup and J.S. Valacich (eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York: Macmillan, 1993, pp. 59-77.
19. Dennis, A.R., and Garfield, M.J. The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 27, 2 (June 2003), 289-323.
20. Dennis, A.R., and Reinicke, B. Beta versus VHS and the acceptance of electronic brainstorming technology. MIS Quarterly, 28, 1 (March 2004), 1-20.
21. Dennis, A.R., and Wixom, B.H. Investigating the moderators of group support system use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (Winter 2001-2), 235-258.
22. Dennis, A.R.; Fuller, R.M.; and Valacich, J.S. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32, 3 (September 2008), 575-600.
23. Dennis, A.R.; Kinney, S.T.; and Hung, Y.C. Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Research, 30, 4 (August 1999), 405-437.
24. Dennis, A.R.; Wixom, B.J.; and Vandenberg, R.J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25, 2 (June 2001), 167-197.
25. Dennis, A.R.; George, J.F.; Jessup, L.M.; Nunamaker, J.F.; and Vogel, D.R. Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12, 4 (December 1988), 591-624.
26. DeSanctis, G., and Gallupe, R.B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33, 5 (May 1987), 589-609.
27. DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M.S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 2 (May 1994), 121-147.
28. DeVellis, R.F. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2003.
29. Doyle, S. Using short message services as a marketing tool. Journal of Database Marketing, 8, 3 (April 2001), 273-277.
30. Ericsson, A.B. Loyal wireless enthusiasts. Ericsson, Stockholm, 2001.
31. Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 3 (Winter 1998-99), 7-149.
32. Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3 (Winter 2000-2001), 115-159.
33. Fowler, G., and Wackerbarth, M. Audio teleconferencing versus face-to-face conferencing: A synthesis of the literature. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 3 (Summer 1980), 236-252.
34. Fulk, J. Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 5 (October 1993), 921-950.
35. Fuller, R.M., and Dennis, A.R. Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Information Systems Research, 20, 1 (2009), 2-17.
36. Hassanein, K., and Head, M. Manipulating social presence through the Web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 8 (2007), 689-708.
37. Huang, W., and Wei, K.K. An empirical investigation of effects of GSS and task type on social interactions from an influence perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 2 (Fall 2000), 181-206.
38. Jarvis, C.B.; MacKenzie, S.B.; and Podsakoff, P.M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 2 (September 2003), 199-218.
39. Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Information and Management, 35, 4 (April 1999), 237-250.
40. Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W.; and Chervany, N.L. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (June 1999), 183-213.
41. Keen, P.G.W. MIS research: Reference discipline and cumulative tradition. In E. McLean (ed.), Proceedings of the First Conference on Information Systems. New York: ACM Press, 1980, pp. 9-18.
42. Kock, N. The psychobiological model: Towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organization Science, 15, 3 (2004), 327-348.
43. Koufaris, M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13, 2 (June 2002), 205-223.
44. Li, D.; Chau, P.Y.K.; and Lou, H. Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6, 4 (April 2005), 102-129.
45. Lindell, M.K., and Whitney, D.J. Accounting for common method variance in crosssectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1 (2001), 114-121.
46. Malhotra, N.K.; Kim, S.S.; and Patil, A. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52, 12 (2006), 1865-1883.
47. Markus, M. Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media: Universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Communication Research, 14, 5 (October 1987), 491-511.
48. Massey, A.P., and Montoya-Weiss, M.M. Unraveling the temporal fabric of knowledge conversion: A model of media selection and use. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (March 2006), 99-114.
49. McGrath, J.E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 2 (1991), 147-174.
50. McGrath, J.E., and Hollingshead, A.B. Groups Interacting with Technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1994.
51. Morris, M.G., and Venkatesh, V. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing workforce. Personnel Psychology, 53, 2 (Summer 2000), 375-403.
52. Morris, M.G.; Venkatesh, V.; and Ackerman, P.L. Gender and age in technology adoption and usage decisions: Toward the emergence of a unisex work force. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, 1 (2005), 69-84.
53. Orlikowski, W., and Iacono, C. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the IT in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12, 2 (2001), 121-134.
54. Palen, L., and Grudin, J. Discretionary adoption of group support software: Lessons from calendar applications. In B.E. Munkvold (ed.), Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry. London: Springer Verlag, 2002, pp. 159-180.
55. Pashler, H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 2 (1994), 220-244.
56. Pervan, G.; Bajwa, D.; and Lewis, L.F. A study of the adoption and utilization of seven collaboration technologies in large organizations in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8, 2 (2005), 5-26.
57. Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879-903.
58. Reinsch, N.L., and Beswick, R. Voice mail versus conventional channels: A cost minimization analysis of individuals preferences. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 4 (December 1990), 801-816.
59. Rennecker, J.; Dennis, A.R.; and Hansen, S. Reconstructing the stage: The use of instant messaging to restructure meeting boundaries. In R.H. Sprague (ed.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2006.
60. Rheingold, H. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Jackson, TN: Basic Books, 2002.
61. Rice, R.E. Computer-mediated communications and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication, 37, 4 (December 1987), 65-94.
62. Robert, L.P., and Dennis, A.R. Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 1 (March 2005), 10-21.
63. Sarker, S.V.; Valacich, J.S.; and Sarker, S. Technology adoption by groups: A valence perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6, 2 (2005), 37-71.
64. Short, J.; Williams, E.; and Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley, 1976.
65. Straub, D.W., and Burton-Jones, A. Veni, vidi, vici: Breaking the TA M logjam. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 4 (April 2007), 224-229.
66. Straub, D.W., and Karahanna, E. Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organization Science, 9, 2 (March-April 1998), 160-175.
67. Taylor, S., and Todd, P.A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 4 (December 1995), 144-176.
68. Thompson, R.L.; Higgins, C.A.; and Howell, J.M. Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15, 1 (March 1991), 124-143.
69. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 4 (December 2000), 342-365.
70. Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 2 (May 2008), 273-315.
71. Venkatesh, V., and Brown, S.A. A longitudinal investigation of personal computer adoption in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25, 1 (March 2001), 71-102.
72. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 3 (Summer 1996), 451-481.
73. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 2 (February 2000), 186-204.
74. Venkatesh, V., and Morris, M.G. Why dont men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 1 (March 2000), 115-139.
75. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; and Ackerman, P.L. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 1 (September 2000), 33-60.
76. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; and Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (September 2003), 425-478.
77. Vessey, I.; Ramesh, V.; and Glass, R.L. Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 2 (Fall 2002), 129-174.
78. Waskul, D., and Douglass, M. Cyberself: The emergence of self in online chat. Information Society, 13, 4 (October-December 1997), 375-397.
79. Wickens, C.D. Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 2 (April 2002), 159-177.
80. Wixom, B.H., and Todd, P.A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16, 1 (March 2005), 85-102.
81. Zigurs, I., and Buckland, B.K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22, 3 (September 1998), 313-316.