Medical students' perceptions of video-linked lectures and video-streaming

ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 19-27

  Wang, Ruolan ^a   Mattick, Karen ^b   Dunne, Elisabeth ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cross campus teaching; decision making; student perceptions; video linked lecture; video streaming

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957656784     PISSN: 09687769     EISSN: 17411629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09687761003657622     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bell, T., A. Cockburn, B. McKenzie, and J. Vargo. 2001. Digital lectures: If you make them, will students use them? Constraints on effective delivery of flexible learning systems. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning 3, no. 2. http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2001/2/06/ index.asp.
2. Billings-Gagliardi, S., and K.M. Mazor. 2007. Student decisions about lecture attendance: Do electronic course materials matter? Academic Medicine 82, no. 10: S73-6. (Pubitemid 47482556)
3. Callas, P.W., T.F. Bertsch, M.P. Caputo, B.S. Flynn, S. Doheny-Farina, and M.A. Ricci. 2004. Medical student evaluations of lectures attended in person or from rural sites via interactive videoconferencing. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 16, no. 1: 46-50. (Pubitemid 38292931)
4. Carter, C., A. Clarke, R. Graham, and S. Pomfrett. 1996. The use of video conferencing in higher education. SIMA Report Series ISSN 1356-5370. http://www.agocg.ac.uk/reports/ mmedia/video6/title.htm.
5. Carville, S., and D.R. Mitchell. 2000. 'It's a bit like Star Trek': The effectiveness of video conferencing. Innovations in Education and Training International 37, no. 1: 42-9.
6. Dev, P., T.C. Rindfleisch, S.J. Kush, and J.R. Stringer. 2000. An analysis of technology usage for streaming digital video in support of a preclinical curriculum. Paper presented at the AMIA Symposium, November 4-8, in Los Angeles, USA. http://www.pubmedcentral. nih.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid= 2244014&pageindex=1.
7. Freeman, M. 1998. Video conferencing: A solution to the multi-campus large classes problem? British Journal of Educational Technology 29, no. 3: 197-201.
8. Gill, D., C. Parker, and J. Richardson. 2005. Twelve tips for teaching using videoconferencing. Medical Teacher 27: 573-7. (Pubitemid 43123647)
9. Knipe, D., and M. Lee. 2002. The quality of teaching and learning via video conferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology 33, no. 3: 301-11.
10. Mattick, K., G. Crocker, and J. Bligh. 2007. Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures. Advances in Health Sciences Education 12: 201-10.
11. McCrohon, M., V. Lo, J. Dang, and C. Johnston. 2001. Video streaming of lectures via the Internet: An experience meeting at the crossroads. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, December 9-12, in Melbourne, Australia. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/ melbourne01/pdf/papers/ mccrohonm.pdf.
12. Mohammed, Y.Q., G. Waddington, and P. Donnan. 2007. Face-to-face vs. real-time clinical education: No significant difference. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning 5, no. 4: 287-96.
13. Moridani, M. 2007. Asynchronous video streaming vs. synchronous videoconferencing for teaching a pharmacogenetic pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 71, no. 1: article 16. http://www.ajpe.org/view.asp?art=aj710116&pdf=yes.
14. Pitcher, N., K. Davidson, and J. Goldfinch. 2000. Video conferencing in higher education. Innovations in Education and Training International 37, no. 3: 199-209.
15. Raffelini, C. 2006. An evaluation of the training activities provided by videoconferencing in a university hospital centre. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43, no. 3: 261-77. (Pubitemid 44454540)
16. Soloman, D.J., G.S. Ferenchick, H.S. Laird-Fick, and K. Kavanaugh. 2004 A randomised trial comparing digital and live lecture formats. BMC Medical Education 4: 27. http:// www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/4/27.
17. Stain, S.C., M. Mitchell, R. Belue, V. Mosley, S. Wherry, C.Z. Adams, K. Lomis, and P.C. Williams. 2005. Objective assessment of videoconferenced lectures in a surgical clerkship. The American Journal of Surgery 189: 81-4. (Pubitemid 40215512)
18. Whitten, P., D.J. Ford, N. Davis, R. Speicher, and B. Collins. 2005. Comparison of face-to-face versus interactive video continuing medical education delivery modalities. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 18: 93-9.