Pentablock copolymers of pluronic F127 and modified poly(2-dimethyl amino)ethyl methacrylate for internalization mechanism and gene transfection studies

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 8, Issue , 2013, Pages 2011-2027

  Huang, Shih Jer ^a   Wang, Tzu Pin ^a   Lue, Sheng I ^a   Wang, Li Fang ^a  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Atom transfer radical polymerization; Copolymer; Dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate; Nonviral vector; Pluronic F127

Indexed keywords

CLATHRIN; COPOLYMER; NANOPARTICLE; PLASMID DNA; POLOXAMER POLY(DIMETHYLAMINOETHYL METHACRYLATE ACRYLIC ACID); POLOXAMER POLY(DIMETHYLAMINOETHYL METHACRYLATE TERT BUTYLACRYLATE); POLOXAMER POLY(DIMETHYLAMINOETHYL)METHACRYLATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CAVEOLA; CELL VIABILITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; EMBRYO; ENDOCYTOSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO GENE TRANSFER; INTERNALIZATION; NONVIRAL GENE DELIVERY SYSTEM; PARTICLE SIZE; SYNTHESIS;

ATOM TRANSFER RADICAL POLYMERIZATION; COPOLYMER; DIMETHYLAMINOETHYL METHACRYLATE; NONVIRAL VECTOR; PLURONIC F127;

CELL SURVIVAL; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; METHACRYLATES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NYLONS; POLOXAMER; POLYMERIZATION; POLYMERS; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TRANSFECTION;

BOVINAE;

EID: 84878434115     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S44222     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Behr J P. Synthetic gene transfer vectors II: back to the future. Acc Chem Res. 2012;45(7):980-984.
2. Samal SK, Dash M, Van Vlierberghe S, et al. Cationic polymers and their therapeutic potential. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(21):7147-7194.
3. Jäger M, Schubert S, Ochrimenko S, Fischer D, Schubert US. Branched and linear poly(ethylene imine)-based conjugates: synthetic modifcation, characterization, and application. Chem Soc Rev. 2012; 41(13):4755-4767.
4. Agarwal S, Zhang Y, Maji S, Greiner A. PDMAEMA based gene delivery materials. Materials Today. 2012;15(9):388-393.
5. Hunter AC. Molecular hurdles in polyfectin design and mechanistic background to polycation induced cytotoxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58(14):1523-1531.
6. Wen Y, Guo Z, Du Z, et al. Serum tolerance and endosomal escape capacity of histidine-modified pDNA-loaded complexes based on polyamido-amine dendrimer derivatives. Biomaterials. 2012;33(32):8111-8121.
7. Majewski A P, Schallon A, Jérôme V, Freitag R, Müller AH, Schmalz H. Dual-responsive magnetic core-shell nanoparticles for non-viral gene delivery and cell separation. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(3): 857-866.
8. Dai F, Sun P, Liu Y, Liu W. Redox-cleavable star cationic PDMAEMA by arm-frst approach of ATRP as a nonviral vector for gene delivery. Biomaterials. 2010;31(3):559-569.
9. Xu FJ, Li H, Li J, Zhang Z, Kang ET, Neoh KG. Pentablock copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol), poly((2-dimethyl amino)ethyl methacrylate) and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) from consecutive atom transfer radical polymerizations for non-viral gene delivery. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(20):3023-3033.
10. Guo S, Huang Y, Zhang W, et al. Ternary complexes of amphiphilic polycaprolactone-graft-poly (N, N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), DNA and polyglutamic acid-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) for gene delivery. Biomaterials. 2011;32(18):4283-4292.
11. Zhu C, Jung S, Luo S, et al. Co-delivery of siRNA and paclitaxel into cancer cells by biodegradable cationic micelles based on PDMAEMA-PCL-PDMAEMA triblock copolymers. Biomaterials. 2010;31(8): 2408-2416.
12. Synatschke C V, Schallon A, Jérôme V, Freitag R, Müller AH. Influence of polymer architecture and molecular weight of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) polycations on transfection eff-ciency and cell viability in gene delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2011; 12(12):4247-4255.
13. Sharma R, Lee JS, Bettencourt RC, Xiao C, Konieczny SF, Won YY. Effects of the incorporation of a hydrophobic middle block into a PEG-polycation diblock copolymer on the physicochemical and cell interaction properties of the polymer-DNA complexes. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(11):3294-3307.
14. Funhoff AM, Monge S, Teeuwen R, et al. PEG shielded polymeric double-layered micelles for gene delivery. J Control Release. 2005; 102(3):711-724.
15. Lam JK, Ma Y, Armes S P, Lewis AL, Baldwin T, Stolnik S. Phosphorylcholine-polycation diblock copolymers as synthetic vectors for gene delivery. J Control Release. 2004;100(2):293-312.
16. Husseini GA, Pitt WG. Micelles and nanoparticles for ultrasonic drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(10):1137-1152.
17. Kabanov AV, Batrakova E V, Alakhov VY. Pluronic block copolymers as novel polymer therapeutics for drug and gene delivery. J Control Release. 2002;82(2-3):189-212.
18. Wang M, Wu B, Lu P, Cloer C, Tucker JD, Lu Q. Polyethylenimine-modifed pluronics (PCMs) improve morpholino oligomer delivery in cell culture and dystrophic mdx mice. Mol Ther. 2013;21(1):210-216.
19. Jeon E, Kim HD, Kim JS. Pluronic-grafted poly-(L)-lysine as a new synthetic gene carrier. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;66(4):854-859.
20. Lai TC, Kataoka K, Kwon GS. Pluronic-based cationic block copo-lymer for forming pDNA polyplexes with enhanced cellular uptake and improved transfection efficiency. Biomaterials. 2011;32(20): 4594-4603.
21. Agarwal A, Unfer RC, Mallapragada SK. Dual-role self-assembling nanoplexes for effcient gene transfection and sustained gene delivery. Biomaterials. 2008;29(5):607-617.
22. Valeeva YK, Dorodnykh TY, Alexandrova NA, et al. Block copoly-mers of Pluronics and poly-(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) for delivery of oligonucleotides into tumor cells. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2006;16(4):245-251.
23. Mishra S, Peddada LY, Devore DI, Roth CM. Poly(alkylene oxide) copolymers for nucleic acid delivery. Acc Chem Res. 2012;45(7): 1057-1066.
24. Fan MM, Zhang X, Qin J, Li BJ, Sun X, Zhang S. Self-assembly pluronic and β-cyclodextrin to hollow nanospheres for enhanced gene delivery. Macromol Rapid Commun. Epub July 22, 2011.
25. Araki N, Johnson MT, Swanson JA. A role for phosphoinositide 3-kinase in the completion of macropinocytosis and phagocytosis by macrophages. J Cell Biol. 1996;135(5):1249-1260.
26. von Gersdorff K, Sanders NN, Vandenbroucke R, De Smedt SC, Wagner E, Ogris M. The internalization route resulting in successful gene expression depends on both cell line and polyethylenimine polyplex type. Mol Ther. 2006;14(5):745-753.
27. Perumal O P, Inapagolla R, Kannan S, Kannan RM. The effect of surface functionality on cellular traffcking of dendrimers. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(24-25):3469-3476.
28. Yu K, Wang H, Xue L, Han Y. Stimuli-responsive polyelectrolyte block copolymer brushes synthesized from the Si wafer via atom-transfer radical polymerization. Langmuir. 2007;23(3):1443-1452.
29. Feng CL, Vancso GJ, Schönherr H. Interfacial reactions in confinement: kinetics and temperature dependence of the surface hydrolysis of polystyrene-block-poly(tert-butyl acrylate) thin films. Langmuir. 2005; 21(6):2356-2363.
30. Li M, Li GL, Zhang ZG, Li J, Neoh KG, Kang ET. Self-assembly of pH-responsive and fuorescent comb-like amphiphilic copolymers in aqueous media. Polymer. 2010;51(15):3377-3386.
31. Baek K Y, Lee SH, Hwang SS. Synthesis of amphiphilic star block copo-lymer with photosensitive core by ATRP. Macromolecular Research. 2011;19(5):461-467.
32. Tseng WC, Tang CH, Fang TY. The role of dextran conjugation in transfection mediated by dextran-grafted polyethylenimine. J Gene Med. 2004;6(8):895-905.
33. De Smedt SC, Demeester J, Hennink WE. Cationic polymer based gene delivery systems. Pharm Res. 2000;17(2):113-126.
34. van Duijvenbode RC, Borkovec M, Koper GJM. Acid-base properties of poly(propylene imine)dendrimers. Polymer. 1998;39(12):2657-2664.
35. Varkouhi AK, Scholte M, Storm G, Haisma HJ. Endosomal escape pathways for delivery of biologicals. J Control Release. 2011;151(3): 220-228.
36. Oskuee RK, Philipp A, Dehshahri A, Wagner E, Ramezani M. The impact of carboxyalkylation of branched polyethylenimine on effectiveness in small interfering RNA delivery. J Gene Med. 2010;12(9):729-738.
37. Alshamsan A, Hamdy S, Samuel J, El-Kadi AO, Lavasanifar A, Uludaǧ H. The induction of tumor apoptosis in B16 melanoma following STAT3 siRNA delivery with a lipid-substituted polyethylenimine. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1420-1428.
38. Jones S P, Gabrielson N P, Wong CH, et al. Hydrophobically modifed dendrons: developing structure-activity relationships for DNA binding and gene transfection. Mol Pharm. 2011;8(2):416-429.
39. Lo YL, Wang YS, Wang L F. The Copolymer of Poly(2-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) and Methacrylated Chondroitin Sulfate with Low Cyto-toxicity for Gene Delivery. Adv Healthc Mater. In press 2013.
40. Réthoré G, Mathew A, Naik H, Pandit A. Preparation of chitosan/poly-glutamic acid spheres based on the use of polystyrene template as a non-viral gene carrier. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2009;15(4):605-613.
41. Morris VB, Sharma C P. Folate mediated histidine derivative of quater-nised chitosan as a gene delivery vector. Int J Pharm. 2010;389(1-2): 176-185.
42. Hanzlíková M, Ruponen M, Galli E, et al. Mechanisms of polyethylen-imine-mediated DNA delivery: free carrier helps to overcome the barrier of cell-surface glycosaminoglycans. J Gene Med. 2011;13(7-8): 402-409.
43. Sunshine JC, Peng DY, Green JJ. Uptake and transfection with polymeric nanoparticles are dependent on polymer end-group structure, but largely independent of nanoparticle physical and chemical properties. Mol Pharm. 2012;9(11):3375-3383.
44. Wang B, He C, Tang C, Yin C. Effects of hydrophobic and hydro-philic modifications on gene delivery of amphiphilic chitosan based nanocarriers. Biomaterials. 2011;32(20):4630-4638.