Effects of hydrophobic and hydrophilic modifications on gene delivery of amphiphilic chitosan based nanocarriers

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 20, 2011, Pages 4630-4638

  Wang, Bingqing ^a   He, Chunbai ^a   Tang, Cui ^a   Yin, Chunhua ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Amphiphilic chitosan based nanocarriers; Gene delivery; Hydrophilic modification; Hydrophobic modification; Self assembled nanocomplexes; Transfection

Indexed keywords

AMPHIPHILIC CHITOSAN BASED NANOCARRIERS; GENE DELIVERY; HYDROPHILIC MODIFICATION; HYDROPHOBIC MODIFICATION; SELF-ASSEMBLED NANOCOMPLEXES; TRANSFECTION;

ADSORPTION; CHITIN; CHITOSAN; COMPLEXATION; GENE THERAPY; GENE TRANSFER; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; LINOLEIC ACID;

GENE EXPRESSION;

CHITOSAN; ENHANCED GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; LINOLEIC ACID; MALIC ACID; NANOCARRIER; PLASMID DNA; POLY(BETA MALIC ACID); UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BINDING; DRUG UPTAKE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE TARGETING; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MALE; MOUSE; NANOPHARMACEUTICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CHITOSAN; GENE TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; NANOPARTICLES; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; TRANSFECTION;

MUS;

EID: 79955522623     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Mao S., Sun W., Kissel T. Chitosan-based formulations for delivery of DNA and siRNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010, 62:12-27.
2. Chae S.Y., Son S., Lee M., Jang M.K., Nah J.W. Deoxycholic acid-conjugated chitosan oligosaccharide nanoparticles for efficient gene carrier. J Control Release 2005, 109:330-344.
3. Liu W., Zhang X., Sun S., Sun G., Yao K., Liang D., et al. N-alkylated chitosan as a potential nonviral vector for gene transfection. Bioconjug Chem 2003, 14:782-789.
4. Lee D., Zhang W., Shirley S.A., Kong X., Hellermann G.R., Lockey R.F., et al. Thiolated chitosan/DNA nanocomplexes exhibit enhanced and sustained gene delivery. Pharm Res 2007, 24:157-167.
5. Liu Z., Zhang Z., Zhou C., Jiao Y. Hydrophobic modifications of cationic polymers for gene delivery. Prog Polym Sci 2010, 35:1144-1162.
6. Germershaus O., Mao S., Sitterberg J., Bakowsky U., Kissel T. Gene delivery using chitosan, trimethyl chitosan or polyethylenglycol-graft-trimethyl chitosan block copolymers: establishment of structure-activity relationships in vitro. J Control Release 2008, 125:145-154.
7. Chan P., Kurisawa M., Chung J.E., Yang Y.Y. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan-g-poly (ethylene glycol)-folate as a non-viral carrier for tumor-targeted gene delivery. Biomaterials 2007, 28:540-549.
8. Zhao X., Yin L., Ding J., Tang C., Gu S., Yin C., et al. Thiolated trimethyl chitosan nanocomplexes as gene carriers with high in vitro and in vivo transfection efficiency. J Control Release 2010, 144:46-54.
9. Zhou H.F., Yu W.T., Guo X., Liu X.D., Li N., Zhang Y., et al. Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic glycidol-chitosan-deoxycholic acid nanoparticles as a drug carrier for doxorubicin. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:3480-3486.
10. Hashimoto M., Morimoto M., Saimoto H., Shigemasa Y., Sato T. Lactosylated chitosan for DNA delivery into hepatocytes: the effect of lactosylation on the physicochemical properties and intracellular trafficking of pDNA/chitosan complexes. Bioconjug Chem 2006, 17:309-316.
11. Zhao Z., He M., Yin L., Bao J., Shi L., Wang B., et al. Biodegradable nanoparticles based on linoleic acid and poly (β-malic acid) double grafted chitosan derivatives as carriers of anticancer drugs. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:565-572.
12. Kean T., Thanou M. Biodegradation, biodistribution and toxicity of chitosan. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2010, 62:3-11.
13. Sashiwa H., Kawasaki N., Nakayama A., Muraki E., Yamamoto N., Zhu H., et al. Chemical modification of chitosan. 13. Synthesis of organosoluble, palladium adsorbable, and biodegradable chitosan derivatives toward the chemical plating on plastics. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3:1120-1125.
14. Cammas S., Renard I., Langlois V., Guerin P. Poly(β-malic acid): obtaining high molecular weights by improvement of the synthesis route. Polymer 1996, 37:4215-4220.
15. Coulembier O., Degee P., Hedrick J.L., Dubois P. From controlled ring-opening polymerization to biodegradable aliphatic polyester: especially poly(β-malic acid) derivatives. Prog Polym Sci 2006, 31:723-747.
16. Lee C.M., Jeong H.J., Kim S.L., Kim E.M., Kim D.W., Lim S.T., et al. SPION-loaded chitosan-linoleic acid nanoparticles to target hepatocytes. Int J Pharm 2009, 371:163-169.
17. Xu L.C., Siedlecki C.A. Effects of surface wettability and contact time on protein adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 2007, 28:3273-3283.
18. Mao H.Q., Roy K., Troung-Le V.L., Janes K.A., Lin K.Y., Wang Y., et al. Chitosan-DNA nanoparticles as gene carriers: synthesis, characterization and transfection efficiency. J Control Release 2001, 70:399-421.
19. Peng S.F., Yang M.J., Su C.J., Chen H.L., Lee P.W., Wei M.C., et al. Effects of incorporation of poly(γ-glutamic acid) in chitosan/DNA complex nanoparticles on cellular uptake and transfection efficiency. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1797-1808.
20. Jiang H.L., Kwon J.T., Kim E.M., Kim Y.K., Arote R., Jere D., et al. Galactosylated poly (ethylene glycol)-chitosan-graft-polyethylenimine as a gene carrier for hepatocyte-targeting. J Control Release 2008, 131:150-157.
21. Gao Y., Zhang Z., Chen L., Gu W., Li Y. Chitosan N-betainates/DNA self-assembly nanoparticles for gene delivery: in vitro uptake and transfection efficiency. Int J Pharm 2009, 371:156-162.
22. Fernandez C.A., Rice K.G. Engineered nanoscaled polyplex gene delivery systems. Mol Pharmacol 2009, 6:1277-1289.
23. Liu Z., Janzen J., Brooks D.E. Adsorption of amphiphilic hyperbranched polyglycerol derivatives onto human red blood cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3364-3373.
24. Khalil I.A., Kogure K., Akita H., Harashima H. Uptake pathways and subsequent intracellular trafficking in nonviral gene delivery. Pharmacol Rev 2006, 58:32-45.
25. Douglas K.L., Piccirillo C.A., Tabrizian M. Cell line-dependent internalization pathways and intracellular trafficking determine transfection efficiency of nanoparticle vectors. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008, 68:676-687.
26. Chen H.H., Ho Y.P., Jiang X., Mao H.Q., Wang T.H., Leong K.W. Quantitative comparison of intracellular unpacking kinetics of polyplexes by a model constructed from quantum dot-FRET. Mol Ther 2008, 16:324-332.
27. Strand S.P., Lelu S., Reitan N.K., Davies C.D.L., Artursson P., Vårum K.M. Molecular design of chitosan gene delivery systems with an optimized balance between polyplex stability and polyplex unpacking. Biomaterials 2010, 31:975-987.
28. Pack D.W., Hoffman A.S., Pun S., Stayton P.S. Design and development of polymers for gene delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005, 4:581-593.
29. Sato T., Ishii T., Okahata Y. In vitro gene delivery mediated by chitosan. Effect of pH, serum, and molecular mass of chitosan on the transfection efficiency. Biomaterials 2001, 22:2075-2080.
30. Erbacher P., Zou S., Bettinger T., Steffan A.M., Remy J.S. Chitosan-based vector/DNA complexes for gene delivery: biophysical characteristics and transfection ability. Pharm Res 1998, 15:1332-1339.
31. Zhou X., Zhang X., Yu X., Zha X., Fu Q., Liu B., et al. The effect of conjugation to gold nanoparticles on the ability of low molecular weight chitosan totransfer DNA vaccine. Biomaterials 2008, 29:111-117.
32. Duceppe N., Tabrizian M. Factors influencing the transfection efficiency of ultra low molecular weight chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2625-2631.