Climate change politics

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 16, Issue , 2013, Pages 421-448

  Bernauer, Thomas ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Climate; Environment; Global governance; Greenhouse gas emissions; Policy diffusion; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877903763     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-062011-154926     Document Type: Review

References (170)

1. Aakre S, Hovi J. 2010. Emission trading: Participation enforcement determines the need for compliance enforcement. Eur. Union Polit. 11:427-45
2. AdgerWN. 2010. Climate change, human well-being and insecurity. New Polit. Econ. 15:275-92
3. Aldy JE, Stavins RN. 2010. Post-Kyoto International Climate Policy: Implementing Architectures for Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
4. Andonova LB. 2008. The climate regime and domestic politics: The case of Russia. Camb. Rev. Int. Aff. 21:483-504
5. Annan K. 2006. Comments made at UNFCCC conference in Nairobi, 15.11.2006. http://www.buildingecology. com/articles/climate-change-kofi-Annans-comments- in-nairobi/
6. AxelrodM. 2011. Climate change and global fisheries management: Linking issues to protect ecosystems or to save political interests? Glob. Environ. Polit. 11:64-84
7. Axelrod R, Keohane RO. 1985. Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Polit. 38:226-54
8. BättigM, Bernauer T. 2009. National institutions and global public goods: Are democraciesmore cooperative in climate change policy? Int. Organ. 63:281-308
9. Bailer S. 2012. Bargaining strategies in climate change negotiations: Do democracies negotiate differently? Climate Policy 12:534-51
10. Bain PG,Hornsey MJ, Bongiorno R, Jeffries C. 2012. Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nat. Clim. Change 2:600-3
11. Bang G, Skjærseth JB. 2012. Understanding growing climate policy differences in the EU and the United States: Scientific knowledge meets governance systems. Unpublished manuscript, Fridtjof Nansen Inst., Oslo
12. Barnett J, AdgerWN. 2007. Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Polit. Geogr. 26:639-55 (Pubitemid 47371959)
13. Barrett S. 2005. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
14. Benjaminsen TA, Alinon K, Buhaug H, Buseth JT. 2012. Does climate change drive land-use conflicts in the Sahel? J. Peace Res. 49:97-111
15. Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature. 2011-2012. Berkeley Earth analysis charts. http://berkeleyearth. org/available-resources. Accessed Dec. 6, 2012
16. Bernauer T, Betzold C. 2012. Civil society in global environmental governance. J. Environ. Dev. 21:62-66
17. Bernauer T, Böhmelt T. 2013. National climate policies in international comparison: The Climate Change Cooperation Index. Environ. Sci. Policy 25:196-206
18. Bernauer T,Böhmelt T, Buhaug H, GleditschNP, Tribaldos T, et al. 2012a.Water-Related Intrastate Conflict and Cooperation (WARICC): A new event dataset. Int. Interact. 38:529-45
19. Bernauer T, Böhmelt T, Koubi V. 2012b. Environmental changes and violent conflict. Environ. Res. Lett. 7:015601
20. Bernauer T, GampferR. 2013. Effects of civil society involvement on popular legitimacy of global environmental governance. Glob. Environ. Change. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.01.001
21. Bernauer T, Kalbhenn A, Koubi V, Spilker G. 2010. A comparison of international and domestic sources of global governance dynamics. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 40:509-38
22. Bernauer T, Koubi V. 2009. Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecol. Econ. 68:1355-65
23. Betsill M, Hoffmann MJ. 2011. The contours of "cap and trade": The evolution of emissions trading systems for greenhouse gases. Rev. Policy Res. 28:83-106
24. Betsill MM, Bulkeley H. 2004. Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The Cities for Climate Protection program. Int. Stud. Q. 48:471-93 (Pubitemid 38763039)
25. Betsill MM, Corell E. 2008. NGO Diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
26. Biermann F, Abbott K, Andresen S, Bäckstrand K, Bernstein S, et al. 2012a. Transforming governance and institutions for global sustainability: Key insights from the Earth System Governance Project. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 4:51-60
27. Biermann F, Abbott K, Andresen S, Bäckstrand K, Bernstein S, et al. 2012b. Navigating the anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science 335:1306-7
28. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC. 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002-2010. Clim. Change 114:169-88
29. Bodansky D. 1999. The legitimacy of international governance: A coming challenge for international environmental law? Am. J. Int. Law 93:596-624
30. Bodansky D. 2010. The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
31. Böhmelt T, Koubi V, Bernauer T. 2012. Civil society inclusion in global governance: Insights from climate politics. Unpublished manuscript, ETH Zurich
32. Bohringer C, Welsch H. 2006. Burden sharing in a greenhouse: Egalitarianism and sovereignty reconciled. Appl. Econ. 38:981-96 (Pubitemid 43840720)
33. Breitmeier H, Underdal A, Young OR. 2011. The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Comparing and contrasting findings from quantitative research. Int. Stud. Rev. 13:579-605
34. Brown DM. 2012. Comparative climate change policy and federalism: An overview. Rev. Policy Res. 29:322-33
35. Buhaug H. 2010a. Climate not to blame for African civil wars. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:16477-82
36. Buhaug H. 2010b. Reply to Burke et al.: Bias and climate war research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:E186-87
37. Bulkeley H. 2010. Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35:229-53
38. Ciocirlan CE. 2008. Analyzing preferences towards economic incentives in combating climate change: A comparative analysis of US states. Clim. Policy 8:548-68
39. Clark WC, Jaeger J, van Eijndhoven J, Dickson N. 2001. Learning to manage global environmental risks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
40. Coase R. 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3:1-44
41. Conliffe A. 2011. Combating ineffectiveness: Climate change bandwagoning and theUNConvention to Combat Desertification. Glob. Environ. Polit. 11:44-63
42. Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D. 2002. Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J. Econ. Perspect. 16:147-68
43. den Elzen MGJ, Schaeffer M, Lucas PL. 2005. Differentiating future commitments on the basis of countries' relative historical responsibility for climate change: Uncertainties in the 'Brazilian proposal' in the context of a policy implementation. Clim. Change 71:277-301 (Pubitemid 41298112)
44. Desombre E. 2000. Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry, Environmentalists, and U.S. Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
45. De Vos MG, Janssen PHM, Kok MTJ, Frantzi S, Dellas E, et al. 2013. Formalizing knowledge on international environmental regimes: A first step towards integrating political science in integrated assessments of global environmental change. Environ. Model. Softw. In Press
46. Ding E, Maibach EW, Zhao X, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A. 2011. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 1:462-66
47. Downs GW, Rocke DM, Barsoom PN. 1996. Is the good news about compliance good news for cooperation? Int. Organ. 52:379-406
48. Dryzek JS, Stevenson H. 2011. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecol. Econ. 70:1865-74
49. Edenhofer O. 2011. Different views ensure IPCC balance. Nat. Clim. Change 1:229-30
50. Egan PJ, Mullin M. 2012. Turning personal experience into political attitudes: The effect of local weather on Americans' perceptions about global warming. J. Polit. 74:796-809
51. Ekardt F. 2011. A critical review of "efficiency ethics": The case of climate economics. Efficiency Sustainability Justice Future Generations 98:181-210
52. Flues F, Michaelowa A, Michaelowa K. 2010. What determines UN approval of greenhouse gas emission reduction projects in developing countries? Public Choice 145:1-24
53. Franzen A, Meyer R 2010. Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 26:219-34
54. Freitas IMB, Dantas E, Iizuka M. 2012. The Kyoto mechanisms and the diffusion of renewable energy technologies in the BRICS. Energy Policy 42:118-28
55. Froyn CB, Hovi J. 2008. A climate agreement with full participation. Econ. Lett. 99:317-19
56. Gartzke E. 2012. Could climate change precipitate peace? J. Peace Res. 49:177-92
57. Gehring T, Oberthur S. 2009. The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 15:125-56
58. Gleditsch NP. 1998. Armed conflict and the environment: A critique of the literature. J. Peace Res. 35:381-400
59. Gordijn B, Have HT. 2012. Ethics of mitigation, adaptation and geoengineering. Med. Health Care Philos. 15:1-2
60. HagemC,Kallbekken S,Maestad O, Westskog H. 2005. Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: Sanctions and strategic behavior. Energy Policy 33:2112-22 (Pubitemid 40251897)
61. Harrison K, Sundstrom LM. 2007. The comparative politics of climate change -introduction. Glob. Environ. Polit. 7:1-18
62. Hauge W, Ellingsen T. 1998. Beyond environmental scarcity: Causal pathways to conflict. J. Peace Res. 35:299-317 (Pubitemid 128354647)
63. Helm C, Sprinz D. 2000. Measuring the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. J. Confl. Resolut. 44:630-52
64. Hendrix CS, Glaser SM. 2007. Trends and triggers: Climate, climate change and civil conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa. Polit. Geogr. 26:695-715 (Pubitemid 47371960)
65. Hendrix CS, Salehyan I. 2012. Climate change, rainfall, and social conflict in Africa. J. Peace Res. 49:35-50
66. Homer-Dixon TF. 1991. On the threshold -environmental changes as causes of acute conflict (reprinted). Int. Secur. 16:76-116
67. Homer-Dixon TF. 1999. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
68. Hovi J, Froyn CB, Bang G. 2007. Enforcing the Kyoto Protocol: Can punitive consequences restore compliance? Rev. Int. Stud. 33:435-49
69. Hovi J, GreakerM,Hagem C, Holtsmark B. 2012a. A credible compliance enforcement system for the climate regime. Clim. Policy 12:755-63
70. Hovi J, Sprinz DF, Bang G. 2012b. Why the United States did not become a party to the Kyoto Protocol: German, Norwegian, and US perspectives. Eur. J. Int. Relat.18:129-50
71. Hovi J, Sprinz DF, Underdal A. 2009. Implementing long-Term climate policy: Time inconsistency, domestic politics, international anarchy. Glob. Environ. Polit. 9:20-39
72. Hsiang SM, Meng KC, Cane MA. 2011. Civil conflicts are associated with the global climate. Nature 476:438-41
73. Hsueh L, Prakash A. 2012. Incentivizing self-regulation: Federal versus state-level voluntary programs in US climate change policies. Regul. Governance 6:445-73
74. IPCC. 2007. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
75. IvanovaG, Tranter B. 2008. Paying for environmental protection in a cross-national perspective. Aust. J. Polit. Sci. 43:169-88
76. Jacobs AM,Matthews JS. 2012. Why do citizens discount the future? Public opinion and the timing of policy consequences. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 42:903-35
77. Jaenicke M. 2008. Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. J. Cleaner Prod. 16:557-65
78. Jänicke M. 2012. Megatrend Umweltinnovation: Zur ökologischen Modernisierung von Wirtschaft und Staat. München, Deuchland: Oekom
79. Jinnah S. 2011. Climate change bandwagoning: The impacts of strategic linkages on regime design, maintenance, and death. Glob. Environ. Polit. 11:1-9
80. Keohane RO, Levy MA. 1996. Institutions for Environmental Aid: Pitfalls and Promise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
81. Keohane RO, Ostrom E. 1995. Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains. London: Sage
82. Keohane RO, Victor DG. 2011. The regime complex for climate change. Perspect. Polit. 9:7-23
83. Klinsky S,DowlatabadiH,McDaniels T. 2012. Comparing public rationales for justice trade-offs in mitigation and adaptation climate policy dilemmas. Glob. Environ. Change 22:862-76
84. Koubi V, Bernauer T, Kalbhenn A, Spilker G. 2012. Climate variability, economic growth, and civil conflict. J. Peace Res. 49:113-27
85. Krause RM. 2011. Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by U.S. cities. J. Urban Aff. 33:45-60
86. Krosnick JA, MacInnis B. 2012. Trends between 2008 and 2010 in American public opinion regarding whether the U.S. should take unilateral action on climate change. Unpublished manuscript, Dep. Polit. Sci., Stanford Univ
87. Kvaloy B, Finseraas H, Listhaug O. 2012. The publics' concern for global warming: A cross-national study of 47 countries. J. Peace Res. 49:11-22
88. Landis F, Bernauer T. 2012. Transfer payments in global climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 2:628-33
89. Li Q, Reuveny R. 2006. Democracy and environmental degradation. Int. Stud. Q. 50:935-56 (Pubitemid 44712294)
90. Marquart-Pyatt ST, Shwom RL, Dietz T, Dunlap RE, Kaplowitz SA, et al. 2011. Understanding public opinion on climate change: A call for research. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustainable Dev. 53:38-42
91. Matisoff DC 2008. The adoption of state climate change policies and renewable portfolio standards: Regional diffusion or internal determinants? Rev. Policy Res. 25:527-46
92. McDermott CL, Levin K, Cashore B. 2011. Building the forest-climate bandwagon: REDD+ and the logic of problem amelioration. Glob. Environ. Polit. 11:85-103
93. McLean EV. 2006. International organizations and environmental aid. PhD thesis, Univ. Rochester
94. McLean EV, Stone RW. 2012. The Kyoto Protocol: Two-level bargaining and European integration. Int. Stud. Q. 56:99-113
95. MeadowsDH, Randers J,MeadowsDL 2004. The Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update.White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green www.annualreviews.org • Climate Change Politics 445
96. Metz B, Berk M, den Elzen M, de Vries B, van Vuuren D. 2002. Towards an equitable global climate change regime: Compatibility with Article 2 of the Climate Change Convention and the link with sustainable development. Clim. Policy 2:211-30
97. Michaelowa A, Michaelowa K. 2007. Does climate policy promote development? Clim. Change 84:1-4 (Pubitemid 47196640)
98. Michaelowa A, Michaelowa K. 2011. Coding error or statistical embellishment? The political economy of reporting climate aid. World Dev. 39:2010-20
99. Michaelowa K, Michaelowa A. 2012. Negotiating climate change. Clim. Policy 12:527-33
100. Miguel E, Satyanath S, Sergenti E. 2004. Economic shocks and civil conflict: An instrumental variables approach. J. Polit. Econ. 112:725-53 (Pubitemid 39239216)
101. Mitchell RB. 2006a. Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
102. Mitchell RB. 2006b. Part two: The effectiveness of international environmental regimes -problem structure, institutional design, and the relative effectiveness of international environmental agreements. Glob. Environ. Polit. 6:72-89 (Pubitemid 44411349)
103. Mitchell RB, Keilbach PM. 2001. Situation structure and institutional design: Reciprocity, coercion, and exchange. Int. Organ. 55:891-917 (Pubitemid 33594229)
104. Neumayer E. 2002. Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A crosscountry analysis. J. Peace Res. 39:139-64
105. OstromE. 2009.Ageneral framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419-22
106. OvodenkoA,Keohane RO. 2012. Institutional diffusion in international environmental affairs. Int. Aff. 88:523-41
107. Oye KA, Maxwell JH. 1994. Self-interest and environmental management. J. Theor. Polit. 6:593-624
108. Page EA. 2008. Distributing the burdens of climate change. Environ. Polit. 17:556-75
109. Parks BC, Roberts JT. 2010. Climate change, social theory and justice. Theory Cult. Soc. 27:134-66
110. Parson E. 2003. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
111. Paterson M. 2010. Legitimation and accumulation in climate change governance. New Polit. Econ. 15:345-68
112. Perkins R, Neumayer E. 2012. Do recipient country characteristics affect international spillovers of CO2-efficiency via trade and foreign direct investment? Clim. Change 112:469-91
113. Raleigh C. 2010. Political marginalization, climate change, and conflict in African Sahel states. Int. Stud. Rev. 12:69-86
114. Raleigh C. 2011. The search for safety: The effects of conflict, poverty and ecological influences on migration in the developing world. Glob. Environ. Change -Hum. Policy Dimens. 21:S82-S93
115. Raustiala K. 1997. States, NGOs, and international environmental institutions. Int. Stud. Q. 41:719-40
116. Ringius L, Torvanger A, Underdal A. 2002. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int. Environ. Agreements 1-22
117. Rive N, Torvanger A, Fuglestvedt JS. 2006. Climate agreements based on responsibility for global warming: Periodic updating, policy choices, and regional costs. Glob. Environ. Change -Hum. Policy Dimens. 16:182-94 (Pubitemid 43732509)
118. Roberts JT, Parks BC. 2009. Ecologically unequal exchange, ecological debt, and climate justice. The history and implications of three related ideas for a new social movement. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 50:385-409
119. Rogelj J, Nabel J, Chen C, HareW,Markmann K, et al. 2010. Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry. Nature 464:1126-28
120. Sandler T. 2004. Global Collective Action. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
121. Schaffer LM. 2011. Voluntary climate change initiatives in the U.S.: Analyzing participation in space and time. PhD diss., Eidgen össische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, No. 19475. http://e-collection. library.ethz.ch/view/eth:2712
122. Schreurs MA, Selin H, VanDeveer SD. 2009. Transatlantic Environment and Energy Politics: Comparative and International Perspectives. Farnham, UK/Burlington, VT: Ashgate
123. Schreurs MA, Tiberghien Y. 2007. Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation. Glob. Environ. Polit. 7:19-46
124. Selin H. 2011. Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change. Rev. Policy Res. 28:387-88
125. Selin H, VanDeveer SD. 2009. Changing Climates in North American Politics: Institutions, Policymaking, and Multilevel Governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
126. Shipan CR, Volden C. 2006. Bottom-up federalism: The diffusion of antismoking policies from US cities to states. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50:825-43 (Pubitemid 44411927)
127. Siegfried T, Bernauer T. 2007. Estimating the performance of international regulatory regimes:methodology and empirical application to international watermanagement in the Naryn/SyrDarya basin. Water Resour. Res. 43:W11406
128. Skodvin ET, Gullberg AT, Aakre S. 2010. Target-group influence and political feasibility: The case of climate policy design in Europe. J. Eur. Public Policy 17:856-75
129. Smith JB, Schneider SH, Oppenheimer M, Yohe GW, Hare W, et al. 2009. Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "reasons for concern." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:4133-37
130. Spilker G. 2012a.Helpful organizations:membership in inter-governmental organizations and environmental quality in developing countries. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 42:345-70
131. Spilker G. 2012b. Globalization, Political Institutions and the Environment in Developing Countries. New York and London: Routledge
132. Spillmann KR, Baechler GN. 1995. Environmental crisis: Regional conflicts and ways of cooperation: Report of the international conference at Monte Verita, Ascona, Switzerland, 3-7 October 1994. Zurich/Bern: Cent. Secur. Stud. Confl. Res., Swiss Peace Found
133. Sprinz D, Vaahtoranta T. 1994. The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. Int. Organ. 48(1):77-105
134. Steffek J. 2003. The legitimation of international governance: A discourse approach. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 9:249-75
135. Stein JV. 2005. Do treaties constrain or screen? Selection bias and treaty compliance. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 99:611-22
136. Stein JV. 2008. The international law and politics of climate change. J. Confl. Resolut. 52:243-68
137. Steinberg PF, VanDeveer SD. 2012. Comparative Environmental Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
138. Stern DI. 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32:1419-39 (Pubitemid 38964623)
139. Stern N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
140. Swart R,MarinovaN. 2010. Policy options in a worst case climate change world. Mitigation Adaptation Strateg. Glob. Change 15:531-49
141. TheisenOM, Holtermann H, Buhaug H. 2011. Climatewars? Assessing the claim that drought breeds conflict. Int. Secur. 36:79-106
142. Thompson A. 2006. Management under anarchy: The international politics of climate change. Clim. Change 78:7-29 (Pubitemid 44392991)
143. Thompson A. 2010. Rational design in motion: Uncertainty and flexibility in the global climate regime. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 16:269-96
144. Tingley D, Tomz M. 2012. Conditional cooperation and climate change. Unpublished manuscript, Dep. Polit. Sci., Stanford Univ
145. Tol RSJ, Yohe GW. 2009. The Stern review: A deconstruction. Energy Policy 37:1032-40
146. Underdal A, Hovi J, Kallbekken S, Skodvin T. 2012. Can conditional commitments break the climate change negotiations deadlock? Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 4:475-93
147. UNEP. 2010. Compliance Mechanisms Under Selected Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Geneva: United Nations Environ. Prog
148. Urpelainen J. 2009. Explaining the Schwarzenegger phenomenon: Local frontrunners in climate policy. Glob. Environ. Polit. 9:82-105
149. Urpelainen J. 2011. Can unilateral leadership promote international environmental cooperation? Int. Interact. 37:320-39
150. Urpelainen J. 2012a. Global warming, irreversibility, and uncertainty: A political analysis. Glob. Environ. Polit. 12:68-85
151. Urpelainen J. 2012b. The strategic design of technology funds for climate cooperation: Generating joint gains. Environ. Sci. Policy 15:92-105
152. Vanderheiden S. 2008. Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
153. Vasi IB. 2006. Organizational environments, framing processes, and the diffusion of the program to address global climate change among local governments in the United States. Sociol. Forum 21:439-66 (Pubitemid 44951322)
154. Vaughan NE, Lenton TM. 2011. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Clim. Change 109:745-90
155. Velders GJM, Andersen SO, Daniel JS, Fahey DW, McFarland M. 2007. The importance of the Montreal Protocol in protecting climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:4814-19 (Pubitemid 47186133)
156. Victor DG. 2001. The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
157. Victor DG. 2008. On the regulation of geoengineering. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 24:322-36
158. Victor DG. 2011. Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
159. Victor DG, Kennel CF, Ramanthan V. 2012. The climate threat we can beat: What it is and how to deal with it. For. Aff. 91(3)
160. Virgoe J. 2009. International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change. Clim. Change 95:103-19
161. Vogel D. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
162. Wapner P. 1995. Politics beyond the state -environmental activism and world civic politics. World Polit. 47:311-40
163. Wapner P. 2011. The challenges of planetary bandwagoning: Conclusion. Glob. Environ. Polit. 11:137-44
164. Ward H, Cao X. 2012. Domestic and international influences on green taxation.Comp. Polit. Stud. 45(9):1075-103
165. Ward H, Grundig F, Zorick ER. 2001. Marching at the pace of the slowest: A model of international climatechange negotiations. Polit. Stud. 49:438-61
166. Weiss TG, Burke MJ 2011. Legitimacy, identity and climate change: Moving from international to world society? Third World Q. 32:1057-72
167. Wesley E, Peterson F. 1999. The ethics of burden-sharing in the global greenhouse. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 11:167-96 (Pubitemid 30095015)
168. World Resources Institute 2012. Climate analysis indicators tool (CAIT). http://www.wri.org/project/cait/
169. Young OR. 2011. Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:19853-60
170. Zhang DD, Brecke P, Lee HF, He Y-Q, Zhang J. 2007. Global climate change, war, and population decline in recent human history. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:19214-19