Explaining the Schwarzenegger phenomenon: Local frontrunners in climate policy

Global Environmental Politics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 82-105

  Urpelainen, Johannes ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL WARMING; INCENTIVE; MITIGATION; NATIONAL STRATEGY; POLITICAL ECONOMY;

EID: 70349750087     PISSN: 15263800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.3.82     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adler, Jonathan H. 2005. Jurisdictional Mismatch in Environmental Federalism. New York University Law Journal 14 (1): 130-178.
2. Agrawala, Shardul, and Steinar Andresen. 1999. Indispensability and Indefensibility? The United States in the Climate Treaty Negotiations. Global Governance 5 (4): 457-482.
3. Alderman, Harold. 2002. Do Local Officials Know Something We Don't? Decentralization of Targeted Transfers in Albania. Journal of Public Economics 83 (3): 375-404.
4. Asheim, Geir B., Camilla Bretteville Froyn, Jon Hovi, and Fredric C. Menz. 2006. Regional versus Global Cooperation for Climate Control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51 (1): 93-109.
5. Bang, Guri, Camilla Bretteville Froyn, Jon Hovi, and Fredric C. Menz. 2007. The United States and International Climate Cooperation: International "Pull" versus Domestic "Push." Energy Policy 35 (2): 1282-1291.
6. Barrett, Scott. 1997. The Strategy of Trade Sanctions in International Environmental Agreements. Resource and Energy Economics 19 (4): 345-361.
7. Barrett, Scott. 2003. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Betsill, Michele M., and Harriet Bulkeley. 2004. Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program. International Studies Quarterly 48 (2): 471-493.
9. Brechin, Steven R. 2003. Comparative Public Opinion and Knowledge of Global Climatic Change and the Kyoto Protocol: The US versus the World? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23 (10): 106-134.
10. Collier, Ute, and Ragnar E. Löfstedt. 1997a. Think Globally, Act Locally? Global Environmental Change 7 (1): 25-40.
11. Collier, Ute, and Ragnar E. Löfstedt, eds. 1997b. Cases in Climate Change Policy: Political Reality in the European Union. London: Earthscan.
12. Cornes, Richard, and Todd Sandler. 1986. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. EEA. 2004. Exploring the Ancillary Benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for Air Pollution in Europe. European Environment Agency Technical Report 93/2003.
14. European Commission. 2005. Doing More with Less: Green Paper on Energy Efficiency. Brussels: European Commission.
15. Fischer, Carolyn, and Richard G. Newell. 2008. Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 142-162.
16. Fudenberg, Drew, and Jean Tirole. 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. 2 Abatement Policies. Resource and Energy Economics 21 (3-4): 211-253.
18. Grubb, Michael J., Chris Hope, and Roger Fouquet. 2002. Climatic Implications of the Kyoto Protocol: The Contribution of International Spillover. Climatic Change 54 (1): 11-28.
19. Hanemann, Michael W. 2007. How California Came to Pass AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. Working Paper. University of California, Berkeley.
20. Hayek, Friedrich A. 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review 35 (4): 519-30.
21. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
22. Isaac, R. Mark, David Schmidtz, and James M. Walker. 1989. The Assurance Problem in a Laboratory Market. Public Choice 62 (3): 217-236.
23. Jaffe, Adam B., Richard G. Newell, and Robert N. Stavins. 2005. A Tale of Two Market Failures: Technology and Environmental Policy. Ecological Economics 54 (2-3): 164-174.
24. Keohane, Nathaniel O., Richard L. Revesz, and Robert N. Stavins. 1998. The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy. Harvard Environmental Law Re- view 22 (2): 313-367.
25. Lewis, Joanna I., and Ryan H. Wiser. 2007. Fostering a Renewable Energy Technology Industry: An International Comparison of Wind Industry Policy Support Mechanisms. Energy Policy 35 (3): 1844-1857.
26. Lutsey, Nicholas, and Daniel Sperling. 2008. America's Bottom-Up Climate Change Mitigation Policy. Energy Policy 36 (2): 673-685.
27. Meyer, Niels I. 2003. European Schemes for Promoting Renewables in Liberalised Markets. Energy Policy 31 (7): 665-676.
28. Oates, Wallace E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
29. Oates, Wallace E. 1999. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3): 1120-1149.
30. Oates, Wallace E. 2005. Toward A Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism. International Tax and Public Finance 12 (4): 349-373.
31. Olson, Mancur, Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Peterson, Thomas D., and Adam Z. Rose. 2006. Reducing Conflicts Between Climate Policy and Energy Policy in the US: The Important Role of the States. Energy Policy 34 (5): 619-631.
33. Rabe, Barry. 2004. Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Evolving Politics of American Climate Change Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
34. Rabe, Barry G. 2008. States on Steroids: The Intergovernmental Odyssey of American Cli- mate Policy. Review of Policy Research 25 (2): 105-128.
35. Rabe, Barry G., Mikael Roman, and Arthur N. Dobelis. 2005. State Competition as a Source Driving Climate Change Mitigation. New York University Environmental Law Review 14 (1): 1-53.
36. Roland-Holst, David. 2006. Economic Growth and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in California. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Press.
37. Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4): 387-389.
38. Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
39. Schreurs, Miranda A., and Yves Tiberghien. 2007. Multi-Level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation. Global Environmental Politics 7 (4): 19-46.
40. Selin, Henrik, and Stacy D. VanDeveer. 2007. Political Science and Prediction: What's Next for US Climate Change Policy? Review of Policy Research 24 (1): 1-27.
41. Stern, Nicholas. 2006. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Thompson, Alexander. 2006. Management under Anarchy: The International Politics of Climate Change. Climatic Change 78 (1): 7-29.
43. st Session, S. RES. 98. Sponsored by Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) and Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE).
44. Victor, David G., and Lesley A. Coben. 2005. A Herd Mentality in the Design of International Agreements? Global Environmental Politics 5 (1): 24-57.
45. Victor, David G., Joshua C. House, and Sarah Joy. 2005. A Madisonian Approach to Climate Policy. Science 309: 1820-1821.
46. Vogel, David. 1995. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Weingast, Barry R. 1995. The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Law, Economics, and Organization 11 (1): 1-31.
48. Weitzman, Martin L. 1974. Prices vs. Quantities. Review of Economic Studies 4 (4): 477-491.
49. Weyant, John P., and Thomas Olavson. 1999. Issues in Modeling Induced Technological Change in Energy, Environmental, and Climate Policy. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 4 (2-3): 67-85.