Feedback Dialogues That Stimulate Students' Reflective Thinking

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 227-245

  van der Schaaf, Marieke ^a   Baartman, Liesbeth ^a   Prins, Frans ^a   Oosterbaan, Anne ^a   Schaap, Harmen ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

dialogue; Feedback; interaction; reflective thinking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877825442     PISSN: 00313831     EISSN: 14701170     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2011.628693     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Askew, S. 2002. Feedback for learning, London: Routledge Falmer.
2. Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Quignard, M., Van Amelsvoort, M., Lund, K., Salminen, T., Litosseliti, L. and Munneke, L. 2002. " A framework for analyzing pedagogically-oriented-computer-mediated debates: Rainbow ". In Cahiers de recherché/Research Report IC-3-2002 Université Lumière Lyon 2: Equipe Interaction & Cognition
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. L.C., Kulik, J. A. and Morgan, M. T. 1991. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61: 213 - 238. (doi:10.3102/00346543061002213)
4. Blatt, B., Confessore, S., Kallenberg, G. and Greenberg, L. 2008. Verbal interaction analysis: Viewing feedback through a different lens. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 20: 329 - 333. (doi:10.1080/10401330802384789)
5. Boekaerts, M. 1999. Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31: 445 - 457. (doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2)
6. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. 1985. Reflection: Turning experience into learning, London: Kogan Page.
7. Burleson, B. R. 2009. Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26: 21 - 38. (doi:10.1177/0265407509105519)
8. Butler, D. L. and Winne, P. H. 1995. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65: 245 - 281. (doi:10.3102/00346543065003245)
9. Carless, D. 2006. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14: 171 - 184. (doi:10.1080/09695940701478412)
10. Chi, M. T.H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauch, T. and Hausmann, R. G. 2001. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25: 471 - 533. (doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1)
11. Clarke, S., Timperley, H. and Hattie, J. 2003. Unlocking formative assessment: Practical strategies for enhancing students' learning in the primary and intermediate classroom, Auckland: Hodder Moa Beckett.
12. Coleman, E. B. 1998. Using explanatory knowledge during collaborative problem solving in science. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7 (3 & 4): 387 - 427.
13. Duijnhouwer, H. 2010. Feedback effects on students' writing motivation, progress, and performance (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University). Retrieved October 5, 2010, from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations
14. Erkens, G. 2001. MEPA: Multiple Episode Protocol Analysis (Version 4.10). Utrecht: Utrecht University
15. Gibbs, G. and Simpson, C. 2004. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1: 3 - 31.
16. Gott, R. and Duggan, S. 1996. Practical work: Its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18 (7): 791 - 806. (doi:10.1080/0950069960180705)
17. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1): 81 - 112. (doi:10.3102/003465430298487)
18. Higgins, R., Hartley, P. and Skelton, A. 2002. The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27 (1): 53 - 64. (doi:10.1080/03075070120099368)
19. Howley, R. D. and Martindale, J. 2004. The efficacy of standardized patient feedback in clinical teaching: A mixed methods analysis. Medical Education Online, 9 (18) Retrieved October 6, 2010, from http://www.med-ed-online.org/
20. Hyatt, D. F. 2005. 'Yes, a very good point!' A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments. Teaching in Higher Education, 10 (3): 339 - 353. (doi:10.1080/13562510500122222)
21. Kirschner, P. A. 1992. Epistemology, practical work an academic skills in science education. Science & Education, 1: 273 - 299. (doi:10.1007/BF00430277)
22. Kluger, A. N. and DeNisi, A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 254 - 284. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254)
23. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A. and Kaplan, D. 2000. The development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (4): 495 - 523. (doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_3)
24. Lee, H. 2005. Understanding and assessing preservice teachers' reflective thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21: 699 - 715. (doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.007)
25. Lunnetta, V. N., Hofstein, A. and Clough, M. P. 2007. " Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice ". In Handbook of research on science education, Edited by: Abell, S. K. and Lederman, N. G. 393 - 441. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Mansvelder-Longayroux, D., Beijaard, D. and Verloop, N. 2007. The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23 (1): 47 - 62. (doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.033)
27. Mainhard, T., Van der Rijst, R., Van Tartwijk and Wubbels, T. 2009. A model for the supervisor-doctoral student relationship. Higher Education, 58: 359 - 373. (doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8)
28. Mezirow, J. 1991. Transformative dimensions of adult learning, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. National Research Council. 2000. Inquiry and the national science educations standards: A guide for teaching and learning, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31: 199 - 218. (doi:10.1080/03075070600572090)
31. Oosterbaan, A., Van der Schaaf, M., Baartman, L. and Stokking, K. 2010. Reflection during portfolio-based conversations. International Journal of Educational Research, 49 (4-5): 151 - 160. (doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.02.001)
32. Prins, F., Sluijsmans, D. M.A. and Kirschner, P. A. 2006. Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles and preferences. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11: 289 - 303. (doi:10.1007/s10459-005-3250-z)
33. Prins, F. and Mainhard, M. T. August 2009. Fostering student's self-regulation during feedback dialogues in vocational education August, Paper presented at the 13th biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
34. Ramaprasad, A. 1983. On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28: 4 - 13. (doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103)
35. Rust, C., Price, M. and O'Donovan, B. 2003. Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (2): 147 - 164. (doi:10.1080/02602930301671)
36. Sadler, D. R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18: 119 - 144. (doi:10.1007/BF00117714)
37. Sadler, D. R. 1998. Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5: 77 - 84. (doi:10.1080/0969595980050104)
38. Sadler, D. R. 2010. Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35 (5): 535 - 550. (doi:10.1080/02602930903541015)
39. Shute, V. J. 2008. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1): 153 - 189. (doi:10.3102/0034654307313795)
40. Shuell, T. J. 1988. The role of the student in learning from instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13 (3): 276 - 295. (doi:10.1016/0361-476X(88)90027-6)
41. Stokking, K., Van der Schaaf, Jaspers, J. and Erkens, G. 2004. Teachers' assessment of students' research skills. British Educational Research Journal, 30: 93 - 116. (doi:10.1080/01411920310001629983)
42. Stokking, K., Van der Schaaf, Leenders, F. and De Jong, J. June 2004. Measurement of students' reflection June, Paper presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen [Educational Research Conference, Utrecht, The Netherlands
43. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J.G. and Van Gog, T. 2004. Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: Effects on students' self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20: 551 - 567. (doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001)
44. Vehviläinen, S. 2009. Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53 (2): 185 - 201. (doi:10.1080/00313830902757592)
45. Vermunt, J. D. 1996. Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31: 25 - 50. (doi:10.1007/BF00129106)
46. Vermunt, J. D. and Verloop, N. 1999. Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9: 257 - 280. (doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00028-0)
47. Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Wallman, A., Kettis Lindblad, A., Hall, S., Lundmark, A. and Ring, L. 2008. A categorization scheme for assessing pharmacy students' levels of reflection during internships. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72 (1): 1 - 10. (doi:10.5688/aj720105)
49. White, B. Y. and Frederiksen, J. R. 1998. Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (1): 3 - 118. (doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2)
50. Zion, M., Michalsky, T. and Mevarech, Z. R. 2005. The effects of metacognitive instruction embedded within an asynchronous learning network on scientific inquiry skills. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (8): 959 - 983. (doi:10.1080/09500690500068626)