Soft sensor assisted dynamic bioprocess control: Efficient tools for bioprocess development

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 96, Issue , 2013, Pages 190-198

  Sagmeister, Patrick ^a   Wechselberger, Patrick ^a   Jazini, Mohammadhadi ^a   Meitz, Andrea ^b   Langemann, Timo ^b,c   Herwig, Christoph ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b RESEARCH CENTER PHARMACEUTICAL ENGINEERING GMBH   (Austria)

^c BIRD C Gmb H and Co KG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bioprocess Technology; Dynamic Experiments; Mathematical Modelling; Process analytical technology; Process control; Soft sensors

Indexed keywords

ESCHERICHIA COLI; EXPERIMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS CONTROL; SENSORS;

BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS; BIOPROCESS DEVELOPMENT; BIOPROCESSES; DYNAMIC CONTROLLABILITY; DYNAMIC EXPERIMENT; PROCESS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY; SOFT SENSORS; SOFT-SENSING APPROACH;

PLANNING;

EID: 84877803588     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.02.069     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aehle M., Kuprijanov A., Schaepe S., Simutis R., Lübbert A. Increasing batch-to-batch reproducibility of CHO cultures by robust open-loop control. Cytotechnology 2011, 63:41-47.
2. Arnau C., Casas C., Valero F. The effect of glycerol mixed substrate on the heterologous production of a Rhizopus oryzae lipase in Pichia pastoris system. Biochem. Eng. J. 2011, 57:30-37.
3. De Assis A.J., Filho R.M. Soft sensors development for on-line bioreactor state estimation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24:1099-1103.
4. Betts J.I., Baganz F. Miniature bioreactors: current practices and future opportunities. Microb. Cell Fact. 2006, 5:21.
5. Caramihai M., Chirvase A., Fonteix C., Marc I., Fournier F., Misleanu R., Ungureanu C. Optimal fed-batch bioprocess control. An advanced approach. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2007, 24:787-792.
6. DeLisa M.P., Li J., Rao G., Weigand W.A., Bentley W.E. Monitoring GFP-operon fusion protein expression during high cell density cultivation of Escherichia coli using an on-line optical sensor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 65:54-64.
7. Dietzsch C., Spadiut O., Herwig C. A fast approach to determine a fed batch feeding profile for recombinant Pichia pastoris strains. Microb. Cell Fact. 2011, 10:85.
8. Dietzsch C., Spadiut O., Herwig C. A dynamic method based on the specific substrate uptake rate to set up a feeding strategy for Pichia pastoris. Microb. Cell Fact. 2011, 10:14.
9. Dubach A.C., Märkl H. Application of an extended kalman filter method for monitoring high density cultivation of Escherichia coli. J. Fermentation and Bioengineering 1992, 73:396-402.
10. Duboc P., von Stockar U., Villadsen J. Simple generic model for dynamic experiments withSaccharomyces cerevisiae in continuous culture: decoupling between anabolism and catabolism. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 60:180-189.
11. EMA, 2010. Guideline on real time release testing (formerly guideline on parametric release). Retrieved October 2012 from http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2010/03/WC500075028.pdf.
12. FDA 2004. PAT-A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Development, Manufacturing, and Quality Assurance. Retrieved October 2012 from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/ucm070305.pdf.
13. Feitkenhauer H., Schnicke S., Müller R., Märkl H. Determination of the kinetic parameters of the phenol-degrading thermophile Bacillus themoleovorans sp. A2. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 57:744-750.
14. Gadkar K.G., Mehra S., Gomes J. On-line adaptation of neural networks for bioprocess control. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2005, 29:1047-1057.
15. Ghoul M., Dardenne M., Fonteix C., Marc A. Extended Kalman filtering technique for the on-line control of OKT3 hybridoma cultures. Biotechnol. Tech. 1991, 5:367-370.
16. Glassey J., Gernaey K.V., Clemens C., Schulz T.W., Oliveira R., Striedner G., Mandenius C.-F. Process analytical technology (PAT) for biopharmaceuticals. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6:369-377.
17. van der Heijden R.T.J.M., Heijnen J.J., Hellinga C., Romein B., K.C.A.M.Luyben Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems: I. Classification of the calculability and the balanceability of conversion rates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1994, 43:3-10.
18. Hellwig S., Emde F., Raven N.P., Henke M., van Der Logt P., Fischer R. Analysis of single-chain antibody production in Pichia pastoris using on-line methanol control in fed-batch and mixed-feed fermentations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 74:344-352.
19. Herwig C., Marison I., von Stockar U. On-line stoichiometry and identification of metabolic state under dynamic process conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 75:345-354.
20. Herwig C., von Stockar U. A small metabolic flux model to identify transient metabolic regulations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioprocess and Biosyst. Eng. 2002, 24:395-403.
21. Herwig C., Von Stockar U. Quantitative comparison of transient growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces kluyveri, and Kluyveromyces lactis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 81:837-847.
22. Jenzsch M., Simutis R., Luebbert A. Generic model control of the specific growth rate in recombinant Escherichia coli cultivations. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 122:483-493.
23. Jobé A.M., Herwig C., Surzyn M., Walker B., Marison I., von Stockar U. Generally applicable fed-batch culture concept based on the detection of metabolic state by on-line balancing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 82:627-639.
24. Jungo C., Marison I., von Stockar U. Mixed feeds of glycerol and methanol can improve the performance of Pichia pastoris cultures: a quantitative study based on concentration gradients in transient continuous cultures. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 128:824-837.
25. Kadlec P., Gabrys B., Strandt S. Data-driven soft sensors in the process industry. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33:795-814.
26. Karakuzu C., Türker M., Öztürk S. Modelling, on-line state estimation and fuzzy control of production scale fed-batch baker's yeast fermentation. Control Eng. Pract. 2006, 14:959-974.
27. Kiviharju K., Salonen K., Moilanen U., Eerikäinen T. Biomass measurement online: the performance of in situ measurements and software sensors. J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35:657-665.
28. Koh B.T., Nakashimada U., Pfeiffer M., Yap M.G.S. Comparison of acetate inhibition on growth of host and recombinant E. coli K12 strains. Biotechnol. Lett. 1992, 14:1115-1118.
29. Komives C., Parker R.S. Bioreactor state estimation and control. Current Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14:468-474.
30. Kumar S., Wittmann C., Heinzle E. Review: minibioreactors. Biotechnol. Lett. 2004, 26:1-10.
31. Kusterer A., Krause C., Kaufmann K., Arnold M., Weuster-Botz D. Fully automated single-use stirred-tank bioreactors for parallel microbial cultivations. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 31:207-215.
32. Lee S. High cell-density culture of Escherichia coli. Trends Biotechnol. 1996, 14:98-105.
33. Liu G., Yu S., Mei C., Ding Y. A novel soft sensor model based on artificial neural network in the fermentation process. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10:19780-19787.
34. Luttmann R., Bracewell D.G., Cornelissen G., Gernaey K.V., Glassey J., Hass V.C., Kaiser C., Preusse C., Striedner G., Mandenius C.-F. Soft sensors in bioprocessing: a status report and recommendations. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 7:1040-1048.
35. Mandenius C.-F., Graumann K., Schultz T.W., Premstaller A., Olsson I.-M., Petiot E., Clemens C., Welin M. Quality-by-design for biotechnology-related pharmaceuticals. Biotechnol. J. 2009, 4:600-609.
36. Mailleret L., Bernard O., Steyer J.-P. Nonlinear adaptive control for bioreactors with unknown kinetics. Automatica 2004, 40:1379-1385.
37. Nayak R., Gomes J. Sequential adaptive networks: an ensemble of neural networks for feed forward control of l-methionine production. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64:2401-2412.
38. Osman J.J., Birch J., Varley J. The response of GS-NS0 myeloma cells to single and multiple pH perturbations. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 79:398-407.
39. Puskeiler R., Kaufmann K., Weuster-Botz D. Development, parallelization, and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 89:512-523.
40. Puskeiler R., Kusterer A., John G.T., Weuster-Botz D. Miniature bioreactors for automated high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD): reproducibility of parallel fed-batch cultivations with Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2005, 42:227-235.
41. Ramalingam S., Gautam P., Mukherjee K.J., Jayaraman G. Effects of post-induction feed strategies on secretory production of recombinant streptokinase in Escherichia coli. Biochem. Eng. J. 2007, 33:34-41.
42. Rathore A.S., Bhambure R., Ghare V. Process analytical technology (PAT) for biopharmaceutical products. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398:137-154.
43. Rathore A.S., Winkle H. Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:26-34.
44. Sagmeister P., Wechselberger P., Herwig C. Information processing: rate based investigation of physiological changes along design space development. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2012, 66:526-541.
45. San K., Stephanopoulos G. Studies on on-line bioreactor identification. II. Numerical and experimental results. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1984, 26:1189-1197.
46. Soini J., Falschlehner C., Mayer C., Böhm D., Weinel S., Panula J., Vasala A., Neubauer P. Transient increase of ATP as a response to temperature up-shift in Escherichia coli. Microb. Cell Fact. 2005, 4:9.
47. Sonnleitner B., Locher G., Fiechter A. Biomass determination. J. Biotechnol. 1992, 25:5-22.
48. Undey C., Low D., Menezes J.M.C.D. Pat applied in biopharmaceutical process development and manufacturing: an enabling tool for quality-by-design 1st ed. Crc. Pr. Inc. 2011, 327.
49. Wechselberger P., Sagmeister P., Engelking H., Schmidt T., Wenger J., Herwig C. Efficient feeding profile optimization for recombinant protein production using physiological information. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 35:1637-1649.
50. Wechselberger P., Herwig C. Model-based analysis on the extractability of information from data in dynamic fed-batch experiments. Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29:285-296.
51. Wechselberger P., Sagmeister P., Herwig C. Real-time estimation of biomass and specific growth rate in physiologically variable recombinant fed-batch processes. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2012, Nov 23, (Epub ahead of print).
52. Wechselberger P., Seifert A., Herwig C. PAT method to gather bioprocess parameters in real-time using simple input variables and first principle relationships. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65:5734-5746.
53. Weuster-Botz D., Puskeiler R., Kusterer A., Kaufmann K., John G.T., Arnold M. Methods and milliliter scale devices for high-throughput bioprocess design. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2005, 28:109-119.
54. Wilson D.I., Agarwal M., Rippin D.W.T. Experiences implementing the extended Kalman filter on an industrial batch reactor. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1998, 22:1653-1672.
55. Wong H.H., Kim Y.C., Lee S.Y., Chang H.N. Effect of post-induction nutrient feeding strategies on the production of bioadhesive protein in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 60:271-276.
56. Zalai D., Dietzsch C., Herwig C., Spadiut O. A dynamic fed batch strategy for a Pichia pastoris mixed feed system to increase process understanding. Biotechnol. Prog. 2012, 28:878-886.