Model-based analysis on the extractability of information from data in dynamic fed-batch experiments

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 285-296

  Wechselberger, Patrick ^a   Sagmeister, Patrick ^a   Herwig, Christoph ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bioprocess model; Bioprocess optimization; Data exploitation; Dynamic experiments; Quality by design

Indexed keywords

BIOPROCESS OPTIMIZATION; BIOPROCESSES; DATA EXPLOITATION; DYNAMIC EXPERIMENT; QUALITY BY DESIGNS;

BATCH CELL CULTURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; EXPERIMENTS; PHYSIOLOGY;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ARTICLE; BATCH CELL CULTURE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYTOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; METABOLISM; THERMODYNAMICS;

BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; THERMODYNAMICS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 84873284678     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1649     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Yang LY, Abu-Absi S, Thompson P, Andrabi M, Carone T, Mackin N, Schilling B, Shukla A. A QbD case study: Utilizing small-scale design space knowledge to accelerate progress to large-scale process validation runs. Abstracts of Papers, 238th ACS National Meeting, Washington, DC, United States, August 16-20, 2009. 2009:BIOT-042.
2. Rathore AS. Roadmap for implementation of quality by design (QbD) for biotechnology products. Trends Biotechnol. 2009; 27: 546-553.
3. ISPE. Creating QbD/PAT Management Awareness. www.ispe.org. 2007.
4. ICH. Q8, Pharmaceutical Development (R1). www.ich.org. 2008.
5. Huang J, Kaul G, Cai C, Chatlapalli R, Hernandez-Abad P, Ghosh K, Nagi A. Quality by design case study: an integrated multivariate approach to drug product and process development. Int J Pharma. 2009; 382: 23-32.
6. Guebel DV, Canovas M, Torres NV. Analysis of the Escherichia coli response to glycerol pulse in continuous, high-cell density culture using a multivariate approach. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009; 102: 910-922.
7. Cimander C, Mandenius C-F. Online monitoring of a bioprocess based on a multi-analyser system and multivariate statistical process modelling. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2002; 77: 1157-1168.
8. Kadlec P, Gabrys B, Strandt S. Data-driven soft sensors in the process industry. Comput Chem Eng. 2009; 33: 795-814.
9. Bernard O, Bastin G, Stentelaire C, Lesage-Meessen L, Asther M. Mass balance modeling of vanillin production from vanillic acid by cultures of the fungus Pycnoporus cinnabarinus in bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999; 65: 558-571.
10. Sonnleitner B, Kaeppeli O. Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by its limited respiratory capacity: formulation and verification of a hypothesis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986; 28: 927-937.
11. Korneli C, Bolten CJ, Godard T, Franco-Lara E, Wittmann C. Debottlenecking recombinant protein production in Bacillus megaterium under large-scale conditions-targeted precursor feeding designed from metabolomics. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:1538-1550.
12. Wittmann C, Weber J, Betiku E, Kroemer J, Boehm D, Rinas U. Response of fluxome and metabolome to temperature-induced recombinant protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Biotechnol. 2007; 132: 375-384.
13. Singh AB, Sharma AK, Mukherjee KJ. Analyzing the metabolic stress response of recombinant Escherichia coli cultures expressing human interferon-beta in high cell density fed batch cultures using time course transcriptomic data. Mol BioSyst. 2012; 8: 615-628.
14. Duerrschmid K, Reischer H, Schmidt-Heck W, Hrebicek T, Guthke R, Rizzi A, Bayer K. Monitoring of transcriptome and proteome profiles to investigate the cellular response of E. coli towards recombinant protein expression under defined chemostat conditions. J. Biotechnol. 2008; 135: 34-44.
15. Herwig C, Marison I, Von Stockar U. On-line stoichiometry and identification of metabolic state under dynamic process conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001; 75: 345-354.
16. ICH. Q9, Quality risk management. www.ich.org. 2005.
17. Rathore AS, Winkle H. Quality by design for biopharmaceuticals. Nat Biotechnol. 2009; 27: 26-34.
18. Knorr B, Schlieker H, Hohmann H-P, Weuster-Botz D. Scale-down and parallel operation of the riboflavin production process with Bacillus subtilis. Biochem Eng J. 2007; 33: 263-274.
19. Puskeiler R, Kaufmann K, Weuster-Botz D. Development, parallelization, and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005; 89: 512-523.
20. Harms P, Kostov Y, Rao G. Bioprocess monitoring. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002; 13: 124-127.
21. Clementschitsch F, Bayer K. Improvement of bioprocess monitoring: development of novel concepts. Microb Cell Factories. 2006; 5: 183-196.
22. Rehbock C, Beutel S, Brueckerhoff T, Hitzmann B, Riechers D, Rudolph G, Stahl F, Scheper T, Friehs K. Bioprocess analysis. Chem Ing Tech. 2008; 80: 267-286.
23. van der Heijden RTJM, Romein B, Heijnen JJ, Hellinga C, Luyben KCAM. Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems. III. Sequential application of data reconciliation for sensitive detection of systematic errors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994; 44: 781-791.
24. Jazini M, Herwig C. Effect of post-induction substrate oscillation on recombinant alkaline phosphatase production expressed in Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011; 112: 606-610.
25. Gasser B, Saloheimo M, Rinas U, Dragosits M, Rodriguez-Carmona E, Baumann K, Giuliani M, Parrilli E, Branduardi P, Lang C, Porro D, Ferrer P, Tutino ML, Mattanovich D, Villaverde A. Protein folding and conformational stress in microbial cells producing recombinant proteins: a host comparative overview. Microb Cell Factories. 2008; 7:11.
26. Hoffmann F, Rinas U. Stress induced by recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli. Adv Biochem Eng/Biotechnol. 2004; 89: 73-92.
27. van der Heijden RTJM, Romein B, Heijnen JJ, Hellinga C, Luyben KCAM. Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems. I. Classification of the calculability and the balanceability of conversion rates. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994; 43: 3-20.
28. Wechselberger P, Seifert A, Herwig C. PAT method to gather bioprocess parameters in real-time using simple input variables and first principle relationships. Chem Eng Sci. 2010; 65: 5734-5746.
29. Wechselberger P, Herwig C. Model-based analysis on the relationship of signal quality to real-time extraction of information in bioprocesses. Biotechnol Prog. 2012; 28: 265-275.
30. Smith SW. The Scientist & Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing. California: Technical Publisher; 1997.
31. Davey CL, Davey HM, Kell DB. Introduction to the dielectric estimation of cellular biomass in real time, with special emphasis on measurements at high volume fractions. Anal Chim Acta. 1993; 279: 155-161.
32. Heinzle E, Oeggerli A, Dettweiler B. On-line fermentation gas analysis: error analysis and application of mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 1990; 238: 101-115.
33. van der Heijden RTJM, Romein B, Heijnen JJ, Hellinga C, Luyben KCAM. Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems. II. Diagnosis and estimation of gross errors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994; 43: 11-20.
34. Madron F, Veverka V, Vanecek V. Statistical analysis of material balance of a chemical reactor. AIChE J. 1977; 23: 482-486.
35. Kurtz M. Handbook of Applied Mathematics for Engineers and Scientists. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991.
36. Funk W, Dammann V, Donnevert G. Qualitätssicherung in der Analytischen Chemie, Wiley; 2nd edition 2005.