Yoga for the sinoatrial node: Sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium release confers flexibility

Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 161-163

  Cummins, Megan A ^a   Devenyi, Ryan A ^a   Sobie, Eric A ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENYLATE CYCLASE; CALCIUM CHANNEL L TYPE; CALCIUM CHANNEL T TYPE; CALCIUM ION; CYCLIC AMP; CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; PHOSPHOLAMBAN; POTASSIUM ION; SODIUM CALCIUM EXCHANGE PROTEIN;

BETA ADRENERGIC STIMULATION; CALCIUM TRANSPORT; EDITORIAL; HEART AUTOMATICITY; HEART DEPOLARIZATION; HEART FAILURE; HEART RATE VARIABILITY; HUMAN; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR CLOCK; POTASSIUM CURRENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SARCOPLASMIC RETICULUM; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; SINUS NODE; SINUS TACHYCARDIA; VOLTAGE CLAMP;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; CALCIUM; HEART;

EID: 84877792716     PISSN: 00222828     EISSN: 10958584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.04.020     Document Type: Editorial

References (37)

1. Brown H.F., DiFrancesco D., Noble S.J. How does adrenaline accelerate the heart?. Nature 1979, 280:235-236.
2. Barbuti A., Baruscotti M., DiFrancesco D. The pacemaker current: from basics to the clinics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007, 18:342-347.
3. Baruscotti M., Barbuti A., Bucchi A. The cardiac pacemaker current. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2010, 48:55-64.
4. DiFrancesco D. The role of the funny current in pacemaker activity. Circ Res 2010, 106:434-446.
5. 2+ clocks and surface membrane voltage clocks controls the timekeeping mechanism of the heart's pacemaker. Circ Res 2010, 106:659-673.
6. Lakatta E.G. A paradigm shift for the heart's pacemaker. Heart Rhythm 2010, 7:559-564.
7. DiFrancesco D., Noble D. The funny current has a major pacemaking role in the sinus node. Heart Rhythm 2012, 9:299-301.
8. Lakatta E.G., DiFrancesco D. What keeps us ticking: a funny current, a calcium clock, or both?. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2009, 47:157-170.
9. Maltsev V.A., Lakatta E.G. The funny current in the context of the coupled-clock pacemaker cell system. Heart Rhythm 2012, 9:302-307.
10. 2+ clock generate robust, flexible, and energy-efficient cardiac pacemaking. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2013, 59:181-195.
11. Yanagihara K., Noma A., Irisawa H. Reconstruction of sino-atrial node pacemaker potential based on the voltage clamp experiments. Jpn J Physiol 1980, 30:841-857.
12. Noble D., Noble S.J. A model of sino-atrial node electrical activity based on a modification of the DiFrancesco-Noble (1984) equations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1984, 222:295-304.
13. Kurata Y., Hisatome I., Imanishi S., Shibamoto T. Dynamical description of sinoatrial node pacemaking: improved mathematical model for primary pacemaker cell. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2002, 283:H2074-H2101.
14. 2+ clocks and sarcolemmal voltage clocks confers robust and flexible pacemaker function in a novel pacemaker cell model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009, 296:H594-H615.
15. Kharche S., Yu J., Lei M., Zhang H. A mathematical model of action potentials of mouse sinoatrial node cells with molecular bases. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2011, 301:H945-H963.
16. Severi S., Fantini M., Charawi L.A., DiFrancesco D. An updated computational model of rabbit sinoatrial action potential to investigate the mechanisms of heart rate modulation. J Physiol 2012, 590:4483-4499.
17. 2+ exchanger in sinoatrial node pacemaking: insights from bifurcation analysis of mathematical models. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012, 302:H2285-H2300.
18. Zhang H., Holden A.V., Kodama I., Honjo H., Lei M., Varghese T., et al. Mathematical models of action potentials in the periphery and center of the rabbit sinoatrial node. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000, 279:H397-H421.
19. Oren R.V., Clancy C.E. Determinants of heterogeneity, excitation and conduction in the sinoatrial node: a model study. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1001041.
20. Golowasch J., Goldman M.S., Abbott L.F., Marder E. Failure of averaging in the construction of a conductance-based neuron model. J Neurophysiol 2002, 87:1129-1131.
21. Prinz A.A., Bucher D., Marder E. Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci 2004, 7:1345-1352.
22. Taylor A.L., Goaillard J.M., Marder E. How multiple conductances determine electrophysiological properties in a multicompartment model. J Neurosci 2009, 29:5573-5586.
23. Marder E., Taylor A.L. Multiple models to capture the variability in biological neurons and networks. Nat Neurosci 2011, 14:133-138.
24. Sarkar A.X., Christini D.J., Sobie E.A. Exploiting mathematical models to illuminate electrophysiological variability between individuals. J Physiol 2012, 590:2555-2567.
25. Romero L., Pueyo E., Fink M., Rodriguez B. Impact of ionic current variability on human ventricular cellular electrophysiology. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009, 297:H1436-H1445.
26. Tomaiuolo M., Bertram R., Gonzalez-Iglesias A.E., Tabak J. Investigating heterogeneity of intracellular calcium dynamics in anterior pituitary lactotrophs using a combined modelling/experimental approach. J Neuroendocrinol 2010, 22:1279-1289.
27. Romero L., Carbonell B., Trenor B., Rodriguez B., Saiz J., Ferrero J.M. Systematic characterization of the ionic basis of rabbit cellular electrophysiology using two ventricular models. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2011, 107:60-73.
28. Davies M.R., Mistry H.B., Hussein L., Pollard C.E., Valentin J.P., Swinton J., et al. An in silico canine cardiac midmyocardial action potential duration model as a tool for early drug safety assessment. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2012, 302:H1466-H1480.
29. Tondel K., Indahl U.G., Gjuvsland A.B., Omholt S.W., Martens H. Multi-way metamodelling facilitates insight into the complex input-output maps of nonlinear dynamic models. BMC Syst Biol 2012, 6:88.
30. Weiss J.N., Karma A., MacLellan W.R., Deng M., Rau C.D., Rees C.M., et al. "Good enough solutions" and the genetics of complex diseases. Circ Res 2012, 111:493-504.
31. Sobie E.A. Parameter sensitivity analysis in electrophysiological models using multivariable regression. Biophys J 2009, 96:1264-1274.
32. Sarkar A.X., Sobie E.A. Quantification of repolarization reserve to understand interpatient variability in the response to proarrhythmic drugs: a computational analysis. Heart Rhythm 2011, 8:1749-1755.
33. Mann S.A., Otway R., Guo G., Soka M., Karlsdotter L., Trivedi G., et al. Epistatic effects of potassium channel variation on cardiac repolarization and atrial fibrillation risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 59:1017-1025.
34. Walmsley J., Rodriguez J.F., Mirams G.R., Burrage K., Efimov I.R., Rodriguez B. mRNA expression levels in failing human hearts predict cellular electrophysiological remodeling: a population-based simulation study. PLoS One 2013, 8:e56359.
35. Sarkar A.X., Sobie E.A. Regression analysis for constraining free parameters in electrophysiological models of cardiac cells. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000914.
36. Sobie E.A., Ramay H.R. Excitation-contraction coupling gain in ventricular myocytes: insights from a parsimonious model. J Physiol 2009, 587:1293-1299.
37. Hudson A.E., Prinz A.A. Conductance ratios and cellular identity. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000838.