Digital tomosynthesis: A new future for breast imaging?

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Alakhras, M ^a   Bourne, R ^a   Rickard, M ^a,c   Ng, K H ^a,b   Pietrzyk, M ^a   Brennan, P C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^c Sydney Breast Clinic   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT COMFORT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TWO DIMENSIONAL MAMMOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84876137624     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: 1365229X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.01.007     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, and E. Ward Cancer statistics, 2009 CA Cancer J Clin 59 2009 225 249
2. S.W. Duffy, L. Tabár, and H.-H. Chen The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties Cancer 95 2002 458 469 (Pubitemid 34810170)
3. A. Tingberg X-ray tomosynthesis: a review of its use for breast and chest imaging Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139 2010 100 107
4. D. Kopans, S. Gavenonis, and E. Halpern Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis Breast J 17 2011 638 644
5. R. Van Engen, P. Skaane, and F. Thibault Breast imaging and screening - technology update EJC Supplements 6 2008 4 6
6. E.D. Pisano Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 355 2006 1773 1783
7. F.S. Vernacchia, and Z.G. Pena Digital mammography: it's impact on recall rates and cancer detection rates in a small community-based radiology practice AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 2009 582 585
8. N.F. Boyd, H. Guo, and L.J. Martin Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 2007 227 236 (Pubitemid 46143226)
9. M. Nothacker, V. Duda, and M. Hahn Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review BMC Cancer 9 2009 335
10. M.T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, and P.L. Porter Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 2000 1081 1087 (Pubitemid 30616482)
11. W. Berg, J. Blume, and J. Cormack Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mamography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer JAMA 299 2008 2151 2163 (Pubitemid 351679706)
12. W.A. Berg, Z. Zhang, and D. Lehrer Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk JAMA 307 2012 1394 1404
13. V. Corsetti, N. Houssami, and M. Ghirardi Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up Eur J Cancer 47 2011 1021 1026
14. K. Kelly, J. Dean, and W. Comulada Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts Eur Radiol 20 2010 734 742
15. M.S. Bae, W. Han, and H.R. Koo Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms Cancer Sci 102 2011 1862 1867
16. H.M. Zonderland, E.G. Coerkamp, and J. Hermans Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography Radiology 213 1999 413 422 (Pubitemid 29510587)
17. G. Rahbar, A.C. Sie, and G.C. Hansen Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation Radiology 213 1999 889 894
18. A. Stavros, D. Thickman, and C. Rapp Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions Radiology 196 1995 123 127
19. S.-Y. Chiou, Y.-H. Chou, and H.-J. Chiou Sonographic features of nonpalpable breast cancer: a study based on ultrasound-guided wire-localized surgical biopsies Ultrasound Med Biol 32 2006 1299 1306 (Pubitemid 44349030)
20. H. Zhi, B. Ou, and B.M. Luo Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions J Ultrasound Med 26 2007 807 815 (Pubitemid 46870348)
21. D. Saslow, C. Boetes, and W. Burke American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J 57 2007 75 89 (Pubitemid 46535708)
22. F. Sardanelli, G.M. Giuseppetti, and P. Panizza Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 2004 1149 1157 (Pubitemid 44185114)
23. M. Morrow, J. Waters, and E. Morris MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment Lancet 378 2011 1804 1811
24. N. Biglia, V.E. Bounous, and L. Martincich Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast EJSO 37 2011 199 204
25. S.G. Moore, P.J. Shenoy, and L. Fanucchi Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population BMC Health Serv Res 9 2009 9
26. G. Gennaro, A. Toledano, and C. di Maggio Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study Eur Radiol 20 2010 1545 1553
27. M.L. Spangler, M.L. Zuley, and J.H. Sumkin Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison AJR Am J Roentgenol 196 2011 320 324
28. G. Svane, E. Azavedo, and K. Lindman Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography Acta Radiol 52 2011 134 142
29. I. Andersson, D.M. Ikeda, and S. Zackrisson Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings Eur Radiol 18 2008 2817 2825
30. D. Gur, G.S. Abrams, and D.M. Chough Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 2009 586 591
31. M.J. Michell, A. Iqbal, and R.K. Wasan A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis Clin Radiol 67 2012 976 981
32. P. Skaane, R. Gullien, and H. Bjorndal Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting Acta Radiol 53 2012 524 529
33. T.M. Svahn, D.P. Chakraborty, and D. Ikeda Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy Br J Radiol 85 2012 6
34. A. Tingberg, I. Andersson, and D.M. Ikeda BIRADS classification in breast tomosynthesis compared to mammography and ultrasonography E.A. Krupinski, 9th international workshop on digital mammography 2008 67 73 Tucson, AZ, USA
35. J.T. Dobbins, and D.J. Godfrey Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential Phys Med Biol 48 2003 R65 R106
36. S. Vecchio, A. Albanese, and P. Vignoli A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images Eur Radiol 21 2011 1207 1213
37. P. Timberg, M. Bath, and I. Andersson Visibility of microcalcification clusters and masses in breast tomosynthesis image volumes and digital mammography: a 4AFC human observer study Med Phys 39 2012 2431 2437
38. R.J. Hooley, L. Andrejeva, and L.M. Scoutt Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging Ultrasound Q 27 2011 23 47
39. S.P. Poplack, T.D. Tosteson, and C.A. Kogel Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 2007 616 623 (Pubitemid 47328544)
40. G. Gennaro, E. Baldan, and E. Bezzon Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: preliminary results E.A. Krupinski, 9th international workshop on digital mammography 2008 477 482 Tucson, AZ, USA
41. J.M. Park, E.A. Franken Jr., and M. Garg Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications RadioGraphics 27 2007 S231 S240
42. D. Bernardi, S. Ciatto, and M. Pellegrini Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening Breast Cancer Res Treat 133 2012 267 271
43. W.F. Good, G.S. Abrams, and V.J. Catullo Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 2008 865 869 (Pubitemid 351571506)
44. A.P. Smith, E.A. Rafferty, and L. Niklason Clinical performance of breast tomosynthesis as a function of radiologist experience level E.A. Krupinski, 9th international workshop on digital mammography 2008 61 66 Tucson, AZ, USA
45. M.G. Wallis, E. Moa, and F. Zanca Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution x-ray imaging observer study Radiology 262 2012 788 796
46. H.J. Teertstra, C.E. Loo, and M. van den Bosch Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results Eur Radiol 20 2010 16 24
47. D. Gur, A.I. Bandos, and H.E. Rockette Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm AJR Am J Roentgenol 196 2011 737 741
48. T. Svahn, I. Andersson, and D. Chakraborty The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139 2010 113 117
49. M.L. Zuley, A.I. Bandos, and G.S. Abrams Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations Acad Radiol 17 2010 450 455
50. ICRP The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection J. Valentin Annals of the ICRP 2007 The International Commission on Radiological Protection Ontario
51. R.E. Hendrick Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies Radiology 257 2010 246 253
52. A. Tagliafico, D. Astengo, and F. Cavagnetto One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis Eur Radiol 22 2012 539 544
53. A. Tagliafico, G. Tagliafico, and D. Astengo Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software Eur Radiol 22 2012 1265 1270
54. S.S.J. Feng, and I. Sechopoulos Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization Radiology 263 2012 35 42
55. R. Wilson, P. Skaane, and C. De Wolf Current issues in breast screening EJC Supplements 8 2010 4 6
56. D. Fornvik, I. Andersson, and T. Svahn The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139 2010 118 123
57. A.P. Smith, L. Niklason, and B.R. Ren Lesion visibility in low dose tomosynthesis S.M. Astley, 7th international workshop on digital mammography 2006 160 166 Tucson, AZ, USA (Pubitemid 44113107)
58. N. Houssami, L. Irwig, and J.M. Simpson The contribution of work-up or additional views to the accuracy of diagnostic mammography Breast 12 2003 270 275 (Pubitemid 36944154)
59. C.M. Hakim, D.M. Chough, and M.A. Ganott Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 172 176
60. M. Noroozian, L. Hadjiiski, and S. Rahnama-Moghadam Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization Radiology 262 2012 61 68
61. D. Fornvik, S. Zackrisson, and O. Ljungberg Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography Acta Radiol 51 2010 240 247
62. P. Timberg, M. Bath, and I. Andersson In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography Med Phys 37 2010 5618 5626
63. N.F. Boyd Tamoxifen, mammographic density, and breast cancer prevention J Natl Cancer Inst 103 2011 704 705
64. M.A. Ganott, J.H. Sumkin, and J.L. King Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer? Radiology 238 2006 793 800 (Pubitemid 43289909)
65. D. Kontos, P.R. Bakic, and A.B. Troxel Digital breast tomosynthesis parenchymal texture analysis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study E.A. Krupinski, 9th international workshop on digital mammography 2008 681 688 Tucson, AZ, USA
66. E.A. Rafferty Digital mammography: novel applications Radiol Clin North Am 45 2007 831 843 (Pubitemid 47411641)
67. V. Singh, C. Saunders, and L. Wylie New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection Future Oncol 4 2008 501 513
68. P.A. Carney, D.L. Miglioretti, and B.C. Yankaskas Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 138 2003 168 175 (Pubitemid 36231622)
69. H.P. Chan, J. Wei, and Y.H. Zhang Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis mammography: effects of the number of projection views and dose E.A. Krupinski, 9th international workshop on digital mammography 2008 279 285 Tucson, AZ, USA
70. F. Diekmann, and U. Bick Breast tomosynthesis Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 32 2011 281 287
71. J. Elmore, K. Armstrong, and C. Lehmann Screening for breast cancer JAMA 293 2005 1245 1256 (Pubitemid 40327910)
72. T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J.H. Newhouse Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics Radiology 207 1998 191 199
73. H.-P. Chan, J. Wei, and B. Sahiner Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience1 Radiology 237 2005 1075 1080 (Pubitemid 41636404)
74. F. Diekmann, and U. Bick Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography Eur Radiol 17 2007 3086 3092 (Pubitemid 350142333)
75. L.T. Niklason, B.T. Christian, and L.E. Niklason Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging Radiology 205 1997 399 406 (Pubitemid 27467317)
76. D. Kontos, L.C. Ikejimba, and P.R. Bakic Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment Radiology 261 2011 80 91
77. P.R. Bakic, A.-K. Carton, and D. Kontos Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections1 Radiology 252 2009 40 49
78. A.B. Nover, S. Jagtap, and W. Anjum Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review Int J Biomed Imaging 2009 2009 1 14
79. R.S. Saunders, E. Samei, and J.Y. Lo Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte Carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis Radiology 251 2009 673 682
80. D. Gur, M.L. Zuley, and M.I. Anello Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study Acad Radiol 19 2012 166 171