Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging

Radiology

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 399-406

  Niklason, Loren T ^a   Christian, Bradley T ^b   Niklason, Laura E ^a   Kopans, Daniel B ^a   Castleberry, Donald E ^c   Opsahl Ong, Beale H ^c   Landberg, Cynthia E ^c   Slanetz, Priscilla J ^a   Giardino, Angela A ^a   Moore, Richard ^a   Albagli, Douglas ^c   DeJule, Michael C ^c   Fitzgerald, Paul F ^c   Fobare, David F ^c   Giambattista, Brian W ^c   Kwasnick, Robert F ^c   Liu, Jianqiang ^c   Lubowski, Stanley J ^c   Possin, George E ^c   Richotte, James F ^c   Wei, Ching Yeu ^c   Wirth, Reinhold F ^c   more..

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Kettering Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^c GE GLOBAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, radiography; Breast radiography, radiation dose; Breast radiography, technology; Radiography, digital; Radiography, technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE;

EID: 0030711575     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.2.9356620     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin 1982; 32:194-225.
2. Tabar L, Duffy SW, Krusemo UB. Detection method, tumor size and node metastases in breast cancers diagnosed during a trial of breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1987; 23:959-962.
3. Hilman BJ, Fajardo LL, Hunter TB, et al. Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants. AJR 1987; 149:907-911.
4. Kalisher L. Factors influencing false negative rates in xeromammography. Radiology 1979; 133:297-301.
5. Bassett LW, Bunnell DH, Jahanshahi R, Gold RH, Arndt RD, Linsman J. Breast cancer detection: one versus two views. Radiology 1987; 165:95-97.
6. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian national breast screening study: a preliminary report from five centers. Radiology 1986; 160:295-298.
7. Haug PJ, Tocino IM, Clayton PD, Bair TL. Automated management of screening and diagnostic mammography. Radiology 1987; 164:747-752.
8. Holland R, Mravunac M, Hendriks JHCL, Bekker BV. So-called interval cancers of the breast. Cancer 1982; 49:2527-2533.
9. Martin J, Moskowitz M, Milbrath JR. Breast cancers missed by mammography. AJR 1979; 132:737-739.
10. Holland R, Hendriks JHCL, Mravunac M. Mammographically occult breast cancer: a pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 1983; 52:1810-1819.
11. Feig S, Shaber G, Patchefsky A, et al. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors. AJR 1977; 128:403-408.
12. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF. Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:781-785.
13. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993; 188:297-301.
14. Bird R, Wallace T, Yankaskas B. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617.
15. Miller ER, McCurry EM, Hruka B. An infinite number of laminagrams from a finite number of radiographs. Radiology 1971; 98:249-255.
16. Garrison JB, Grant DG, Guier WH, Johns RJ. Three dimensional roentgenography. AJR 1969; 105:903-908.
17. Richards AG. Variable depth laminography. Biomed Sci Instrum 1969; 6:194-199.
18. Ziedses des Plantes BG. Eine neue methode zur diffenzierung in der rontgenographie (planigrnphie). Acta Radiol 1932; 13:182-192. [German]
19. Sone S, Kasuga T, Sakai F, et al. Chest imaging with dual-energy subtraction digital tomosynthesis. Acta Radiol 1993; 34:346-349.
20. Sone S, Kasuga T, Sakai F, et al. Development of a high-resolution digital tomosynthesis system and its clinical application. RadioGraphics 1991; 11:807-822.
21. Kruger RA, Sedaghati M, Roy DG, et al. Tomosynthesis applied to digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1984; 152:805-808.
22. deVries N, Miller FJ, Wojtowycz MM, et al. Tomographic digital subtraction angiography: initial clinical studies using tomosynthesis. Radiology 1985; 157:239-241.
23. Baily NA, Lasser EC, Crepeau RL. Electrofluoroplanigraphy. Radiology 1973; 107:669-671.
24. Baily NA, Crepeau RL, Lasser EC. Fluoroscopic tomography. Invest Radiol 1981; 16:126-132.
25. Maravilla KR, Murry RC, Horner S. Digital tomosynthesis: technique for electronic reconstructive tomography. AJR 1983; 141:497-502.
26. Maravilla KR, Murry RC, Diehl J, et al. Digital tomosynthesis: technique modification and clinical application for neurovascular anatomy. Radiology 1984; 152:719-724.
27. Chakraborty DP, Yester MV, Barnes GT, Lakshminarayanan AV. Self-masking subtraction tomosynthesis. Radiology 1984; 150:225-229.
28. Edholm PR, Quiding L. Reduction of linear blurring in tomography. Radiology 1969; 92:1115-1118.
29. Edholm P, Quiding L. Elimination of blur in linear tomography. Acta Radiol 1970; 10:441-447.
30. Kolitsi Z, Panayiotakis G, Pailikarakis N. A method for selective removal of out-of-plane structures in digital tomosynthesis. Med Phys 1993; 20:47-50.
31. Ghosh Roy DN, Kruger RA, Yih B, Del Rio P. Selective plane removal in limited angle tomographic imaging. Med Phys 1985; 12:65-70.
32. Ruttiman UE, Qi XL, Webber RL. An optimal synthetic aperture for circular tomosynthesis. Med Phys 1989; 16:398-405.
33. Littleton JT, Winter FS. Linear laminography: simple geometric interpretation of its clinical limitations. Am J Roentgenol Radiat Ther Nucl Med 1965; 95:981-991.
34. Committee on Quality Assurance in Mammography. Mammography quality control manual. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1994.
35. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
36. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 1992; 158:521-526.
37. Hall FM, Storella JM, Silverstone DZ, Wyshak G. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendation for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography. Radiology 1988; 167:353-358.
38. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR 1986; 146:661-663.
39. Ng KH, Looi LM, Bradley DA. Microcalcification clustering parameters in breast disease: a morphometric analysis of radiographs of excision specimens. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:326-334.