Breast Tomosynthesis

Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 281-287

  Diekmann, Felix ^a   Bick, Ulrich ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPROMIDE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PUBLICATION; RADIATION ABSORPTION; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TWO DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 79960515833     PISSN: 08872171     EISSN: 15585034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:1773-1783.
2. Bick U., Diekmann F. Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:1931-1942.
3. Diekmann F., Bick U. Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography. Eur Radiol 2007, 17:3086-3092.
4. Niklason L.T., Christian B.T., Niklason L.E., et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997, 205:399-406.
5. Wu T., Moore R.H., Rafferty E.A., et al. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys 2004, 31:2636-2647.
6. Van de Sompel D., Brady S.M., Boone J. Task-based performance analysis of FBP, SART and ML for digital breast tomosynthesis using signal CNR and Channelised Hotelling Observers. Med Image Anal 2010, 15:53-70.
7. Bliznakova K., Kolitsi Z., Speller R.D., et al. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry. Med Phys 2010, 37:1893-1903.
8. Fornvik D., Zackrisson S., Ljungberg O., et al. Breast tomosynthesis: accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 2010, 51:240-247.
9. Gennaro G., Toledano A., di Maggio C., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:1545-1553.
10. Ho C.P., Tromans C., Schnabel J.A., et al. Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010, 1:3166-3169.
11. Svahn T., Andersson I., Chakraborty D., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010, 139:113-117.
12. Teertstra H.J., Loo C.E., van den Bosch M.A., et al. Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:16-24.
13. Gong X., Glick S.J., Liu B., et al. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. Med Phys 2006, 33:1041-1052.
14. Poplack S.P., Tosteson T.D., Kogel C.A., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007, 189:616-623.
15. Good W.F., Abrams G.S., Catullo V.J., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008, 190:865-869.
16. Gur D., Abrams G.S., Chough D.M., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:586-591.
17. Michell M., Wasan R., Whelehan P., et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, two-dimensional digital mammography and two-dimensional screening mammography (film-screen). Breast Cancer Res 2009, 11(Suppl 2):O1.
18. Wallis M.G., Moa E., Zanca F., et al. Comparing diagnostic accuracy of full field digital mammography and photon counting tomosynthesis: a multireader, multicentre observer study Accessed February 2, 2011. http://rsna2010.rsna.org/search/search.cfm?action=add%26filter=Author%26value=85702.
19. Fang Q, Selb J, Carp SA, et al: Combined optical and x-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging. Radiology.
20. Williams M.B., Judy P.G., Gunn S., et al. Dual-modality breast tomosynthesis. Radiology 2010, 255:191-198.
21. Carton A.K., Gavenonis S.C., Currivan J.A., et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis: a feasibility study. Br J Radiol 2010, 83:344-350.
22. Diekmann F., Freyer M., Diekmann S., et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 2009 Nov 18, (Epub ahead of print).
23. Diekmann F., Diekmann S., Jeunehomme F., et al. Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol 2005, 40:397-404.
24. Diekmann F., Diekmann S., Bollow M., et al. Evaluation of a wavelet-based computer-assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full-field mammography. Acta Radiol 2004, 45:136-141.
25. Chan H.P. Computer-aided diagnosis in breast tomosynthesis and chest CT. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2009, 65:968-976.
26. Chan H.P., Wei J., Sahiner B., et al. Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. Radiology 2005, 237:1075-1080.
27. Chan H.P., Wei J., Zhang Y., et al. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. Med Phys 2008, 35:4087-4095.
28. Singh S., Tourassi G.D., Baker J.A., et al. Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach. Med Phys 2008, 35:3626-3636.