Diagnosis of breast cancer: Contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography

Radiology

Volumn 213, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 413-422

  Zonderland, Harmine M ^a   Coerkamp, Emile G ^b   Hermans, Jo ^a   Van De Vijver, Marc J ^a,c   Van Voorthuisen, Ad E ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MEDICAL CENTER HAAGLANDEN   (Netherlands)

^c NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast neoplasms,US; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0032738190     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv05413     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SA, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134.
2. Jackson VP. The current role of ultrasonography in breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1161-1170.
3. Jackson VP. Management of solid breast nodules: what is the role of sonography? (editorial). Radiology 1995; 196:14-15.
4. Venta LA, Dudiak CM, Salomon CG, Flisak ME. Sonographic evaluation of the breast. RadioGraphics 1994; 14:29-50.
5. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991; 179:463-468.
6. Feig SA. Breast masses: mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30:67-92.
7. Bassett LW. Mammographic analysis of calcifications. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30:93-137.
8. Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30:107-138.
9. Jackson VP. The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 1990; 177:305-311.
10. Guyer PB, Dewbury KC. Sonomammography in benign breast disease. Br J Radiol 1988; 61:374-378.
11. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:837-843.
12. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 1992; 158:521-526.
13. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1997.
14. Francheboud J, De Koning HJ, Beemsterbooer PMM, et al. Nation-wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. Int J Cancer 1998, 75:694-698.
15. Harvey JA, Fajardo LL, Innis CA. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. AJR 1993; 161: 1167-1172.
16. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996; 276:33-38.
17. Sickles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA, Galvin HB, Monticciolo DL. Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammographic screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology 1990; 175:323-327.
18. Goergen SK, Evans J, Cohen GPB, MacMillan JH. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology 1997; 204:131-135.
19. Duijm LEM, Guit GL, Zaat JOM, Koomen AR, Willebrand D. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer. Br J Cancer 1997; 76:377-381.
20. Wallis MG, Walsh MT, Lee JR. A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. Clin Radiol 1991; 44:13-15.
21. Davies RJ, A'Hern RP, Parsons CA, Moskovic EC. Mammographic accuracy and patient age: a study of 297 patients undergoing breast biopsy. Clin Radiol 1993; 47:23-25.
22. Hall FM. Sonography of the breast: controversies and opinions. AJR 1997; 169:1635-1636.
23. Cosgrove DO, Kedar RP, Bamber JC, et al. Breast diseases: color Doppler US in differential diagnosis. Radiology 1993; 189:99-104.
24. Potterton AJ, Peakman DJ, Young JR. Ultrasound demonstration of small breast cancers detected by mammographic screening. Clin Radiol 1994; 49:808-813.
25. Edeiken S. Mammography and palpable cancer of the breast. Cancer 1988; 61:263-265.
26. Lannin DR, Harris RP, Swanson FH, Pories WJ. Difficulties in diagnosis of carcinoma of the breast in patients less than fifty years of age. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993; 177:457-462.
27. Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Lai NE, Paramagul C. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Radiology 1995; 196:427-431.
28. Varas X, Leborgne F, Leborgne JH. Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:409-414.
29. Hilleren DJ, Andersson IT, Lindholm K, Linnell FS. Invasive lobular carcinoma: mammographic findings in a 10-year experience. Radiology 1991; 178:149-154.
30. Zonderland HM, Hermans J, Holscher HC, Schipper J, Obermann WR. Additional value of US to mammography: profit and loss. Eur Radiol 1994; 4:511-516.
31. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer 1995; 15:626-630.
32. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207:191-199.
33. Hilton SW, Leopold G, Olson LK, Wilson SA. Real time ultrasound: application in 300 consecutive patients. AJR 1986; 147: 479-486.