Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: Detection with screening US - Diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics

Radiology

Volumn 207, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 191-200

  Kolb, Thomas M ^a,b   Lichy, Jacob ^a   Newhouse, Jeffrey H ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast neoplasms, US

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENSITY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCCULT CANCER; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031972225     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530316     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the international workshop on screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:1644-1656.
2. Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH III, Smith RA. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 years. Cancer 1995; 75:1619-1626.
3. Bird RE. Increasing the sensitivity of screening mammography. Appl Radiol, February 1993; 72-73.
4. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617.
5. Farria DM, Mund DF, Bassett LW. Evaluation of missed cancers using screening mammography (abstr). AJR 1995; 126:1645.
6. Ma E, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF. Case control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:781-785.
7. Egan RE, Egan KE. Detection of breast carcinoma: comparison of automated water-path whole-breast sonography, mammography, and physical examination. AJR 1984; 143:493-497.
8. Egan RE, Egan KE. Automated water path full breast sonography: correlation with histology of 176 solid lesions. AJR 1984; 143:499-507.
9. Vilaro MM, Kurtz AB, Needleman E, et al. Hand held and automated sonomammography: clinical role relative to x-ray mammography. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8:95-100.
10. Giuseppetti GM, Rizatto G, Gozzi G, Ercolani P. Role of ultrasonics in the diagnosis of subclinical carcinoma of the breast. Radiol Med (Turin) 1989; 78:339-442. [Italian]
11. Kopans DB, Meyer JE, Lindfors KK. Whole breast ultrasound imaging: four year follow-up. Radiology 1985: 157:505-507.
12. Croll J, Kotevich J, Tabrett M. The diagnosis of benign disease and the exclusion of malignancy in patients with breast symptoms. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1982; 3:38-50.
13. Dempsey PJ. The importance of resolution in the clinical application of breast sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14(suppl): 43-48.
14. Rothschild P, Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH. Ultrasound breast examination of asymptomatic patients with normal but radiodense mammograms. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14(suppl):113-119.
15. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C, Sutherland LK, Gold RH, Sarti D, King W III. Automated and hand held breast US: effect on patient management. Radiology 1987; 165:103-108.
16. Frazier TG, Murphy JT, Furlong A. The selected use of ultrasound mammography to improve diagnostic accuracy in carcinoma of the breast. J Surg Oncol 1985; 29:231-232.
17. Kopans DB. What is a useful adjunct to mammography? Radiology 1986; 161:560-561.
18. Guyner PB, Bewbury KC. Ultrasound of the breast in the symptomatic and x-ray dense breast. Clin Radiol 1985; 36:69-76.
19. Bassett LW, Kimme-Smith C. Breast sonography. AJR 1991; 156:449-455.
20. Sickles EA, Filly RA, Callen PW. Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography: comparison using state of the art equipment. AJR 1983; 140:843-845.
21. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NHL. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1993; 189:573-580.
22. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511.
23. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. Cancer 1995; 76:626-630.
24. Weinstein BJ, Phillips G, Kumari-Subaiya S, Fogel SR. Ultrasound detection of non-palpable, non-mammographically visible breast cancer (abstr). J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15(suppl):117.
25. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 2nd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1995.
26. Landis RR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:671-679.
27. Fornage BD. Percutaneous biopsies of the breast: state of the art. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1991; 14:29-39.
28. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134.
29. Hermanek P, Sobin LH, eds. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 4th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
30. Bearhs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, et al, eds. Manual for staging of cancer. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1988.
31. Fajardo L, Hillman BJ, Frey C. Correlation between breast parenchymal patterns and mammographie certainty of diagnosis. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:505-508.
32. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993; 188:297-301.
33. Edeiken S. Mammography and palpable cancer of the breast. Cancer 1988; 61:263-265.
34. Burns PE, Grace MG, Lees AW, et al. False negative mammograms causing delay in breast cancer diagnosis. J Can Assoc Radiol 1979; 30:74-76.
35. Mann BD, Giuliano AE, Bassett LW, et al. Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer as a result of normal mammograms. Arch Surg 1983; 118:23-24.