Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 196, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 737-741

  Gur, David ^a   Bandos, Andriy I ^b   Rockette, Howard E ^b   Zuley, Margarita L ^c   Sumkin, Jules H ^c   Chough, Denise M ^c   Hakim, Christiane M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital breast tomosynthesis; Digital mammography; Free response receiver operating characteristic (FROC); Full field digital mammography (FFDM); Observer performance study; Recall rate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FREE RESPONSE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE;

EID: 79952266901     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.4760     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997; 205:399-406 (Pubitemid 27467317)
2. Niklason LT, Kopans DB, Hamberg LM. Digital breast imaging: tomosynthesis and digital subtraction mammography. Breast Dis 1998; 10:151-164 (Pubitemid 28470210)
3. Smith A. Full-field breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Manage 2005; 27:25-31
4. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CH, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR 2007; 189:616-623
5. Reiser I, Nishikawa RM, Edwards AV, et al. Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. Med Phys 2008; 35: 1486-1493 (Pubitemid 351457516)
6. Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. AJR 2008; 190:865-869
7. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis observer performance study. AJR 2009; 193:586-591
8. Bandos AI, Rockette HE, Song T, Gur D. Area under the free-response ROC curve (FROC) and a related summary index. Biometrics 2009; 65:247-256
9. Rafferty EA. Digital mammography: novel applications. Radiol Clin North Am 2007; 45:831-843 (Pubitemid 47411641)
10. Lewin JM, Niklason L. Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Semin Roentgenol 2007; 42:243-252 (Pubitemid 47494507)
11. Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, et al. Evaluation of linear and non-linear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2001; 8:219-224 (Pubitemid 32666461)
12. Wu T, Moore RH, Rafferty EA, Kopans DB. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys 2004; 31:2636-2647 (Pubitemid 39287881)
13. Chakraborty DP, Berbaum KS. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis and validation. Med Phys 2004; 31:2313-2330 (Pubitemid 39079724)