Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 189, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 616-623

  Poplack, Steven P ^a   Tosteson, Tor D ^b,c   Kogel, Christine A ^a   Nagy, Helene M ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c NORRIS COTTON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast cancer; Digital mammography; Screening; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; TOMOSYNTHESIS; X RAY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34548225376     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2231     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW. Ten-year risk of false-positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 1998; 338:1089-1096
2. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:168-175
3. Poplack SP, Tosteson AT, Grove MR, Wells WA, Carney PA. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire Mammography Network. Radiology 2000; 217:832-840
4. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997; 205:399-406
5. Smith A. Full-field breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Manage 2005; 27:25-31