Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 133, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 267-271

  Bernardi, Daniela ^a   Ciatto, Stefano ^a   Pellegrini, Marco ^a   Tuttobene, Paolina ^a   Fanto', Carmine ^a   Valentini, Marvi ^a   Michele, Stefano Di ^a   Peterlongo, Paolo ^a   Houssami, Nehmat ^b  

^a APSS   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Diagnosis; Mammography; Recall rate; Screening; Tomosynthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; ASYMPTOMATIC DISEASE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84860316410     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1959-y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Glasziou P, Houssami N (2011) The evidence base for breast cancer screening. Prev Med [Epud ahead of print]. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.05.011
2. K Kerlikowske D Grady SM Rubin C Sandrock VL Ernster 1995 Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis J Am Med Assoc 273 149 154 10.1001/jama.1995.03520260071035 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FpslCmsw%3D%3D
3. MB Laya EB Larson SH Taplin, et al. 1996 Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 88 643 649 8627640 10.1093/jnci/88.10.643 1:CAS:528: DyaK28XjsFWgsrw%3D (Pubitemid 26152550)
4. CD Lehman E White S Peacock, et al. 1999 Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false positive findings Am J Roentgenol 173 1651 1655 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFGisg%3D%3D
5. NT Brewer T Salz SE Lillie 2007 Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms Ann Intern Med 146 502 510 17404352 (Pubitemid 351650559)
6. L Giordano D Giorgi P Piccini L Ventura V Stefanini C Senore E Paci N Segnan 2008 Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes-1996-2005 Epidemiol Prev 32 23 36 18770993
7. The National centre for Screening Monitoring: Eighth Report. http://win.osservatorionazionalescreening.it/eng-publications.php. Accessed 10 Oct 2011
8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2009) BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2005-2006. Cancer series no. 48. Cat. no. CAN 44. Canberra: AIHW. http://www.aihw.gov.au. Accessed 10 Oct 2011
9. M Zappa G Spagnolo S Ciatto D Giorgi E Paci M Rosselli Del Turco 1995 Measurement of the costs in two mammographic screening programmes in the province of Florence, Italy J Med Screen 2 191 194 8719147 1:STN:280: DyaK28zmtVeiuw%3D%3D
10. JM Park EA Franken Jr M Garg, et al. 2007 Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications Radiographics 27 S231 S240 18180229 10.1148/rg.27si075511
11. LT Niklason BT Christian LE Niklason, et al. 1997 Digital breast tomosynthesis in breast imaging Radiology 205 25 31
12. EA Rafferty D Georgian-Smith DB Kopans, et al. 2002 Comparison of full-field digital tomosynthesis with two view conventional film screen mammography in the prediction of lesion malignancy Radiology 225 268
13. HJ Teertstra CE Loo MA van den Bosch, et al. 2010 Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results Eur Radiol 20 16 24 19657655 10.1007/s00330-009-1523-2
14. M Mitka 2008 New screening methods offer hope for more accurate breast cancer detection J Am Med Assoc 299 397 398 10.1001/jama.2008.2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsVSrsr8%3D (Pubitemid 351185967)
15. D Gur 2007 Tomosynthesis: potential clinical role in breast imaging Am J Roentgenol 189 614 615 10.2214/AJR.07.2588 (Pubitemid 47328543)
16. SP Poplack TD Tosteson CA Kogel HM Nagy 2007 Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography Am J Roentgenol 189 616 623 10.2214/AJR.07.2231 (Pubitemid 47328544)
17. D Gur GS Abrams DM Chough, et al. 2009 Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study Am J Roentgenol 193 586 591 10.2214/AJR.08.2031
18. M Pellegrini D Bernardi S Di Michele, et al. 2011 Analysis of proportional incidence and review of interval cancer cases observed within the mammography screening programme in Trento province, Italy Radiol Med 116 8 1217 1225 21744249 10.1007/s11547-011-0711-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BC387mtlGntg%3D%3D
19. I Andersson D Ikeda S Zackrisson, et al. 2008 Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings Eur Rad 18 2817 2825 10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9
20. Rafferty EA, Smith AP, Niklason, LT (2009) Assessing radiologist performance in dense versus fatty breasts using combined full-field digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared to full-field digital mammography alone. Radiologic Society of North America 95th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL
21. Moore RH, Boston MA, Kopans DB, et al (2007) Initial callback rates for conventional and digital breast tomosynthesis mammography comparison in the screening setting. Radiologic Society of North America 92nd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL
22. F Caumo S Brunelli E Tosi, et al. 2011 On the role of arbitration of discordant double readings of screening mammography: experience from two Italian programmes Radiol Med 116 84 91 20981500 10.1007/s11547-010-0606-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M3ptlemsg%3D%3D