Optimized proteomic analysis of rat liver microsomes using dual enzyme digestion with 2D-LC-MS/MS

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 82, Issue , 2013, Pages 166-178

  Golizeh, Makan ^a   Sleno, Lekha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dual enzyme digestion; Membrane proteins; Quadrupole time of flight (QqTOF); Rat liver microsomes; Solubilizing agents; Strong cation exchange

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PEPSIN A; TRYPSIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ENZYME METABOLISM; HEAT; HYDROPHOBICITY; ION EXCHANGE; LIVER MICROSOME; MALE; NONHUMAN; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; RAT; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SAMPLING; SOLUBILIZATION; TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROSOMES, LIVER; PEPSIN A; PROTEOLYSIS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SOLUBILITY; TRYPSIN;

RATTUS;

EID: 84875764594     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bendz M., Möller M.C., Arrigoni G., Wåhlander A., Stella R., Cappadona S., et al. Quantification of membrane proteins using nonspecific protease digestions. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:5666-5673.
2. Rietschel B., Bornemann S., Arrey T.N., Baeumlisberger D., Karas M., Meyer B. Membrane protein analysis using an improved peptic in-solution digestion protocol. Proteomics 2009, 9:5553-5557.
3. Vertommen A., Panis B., Swennen R., Carpentier S.C. Challenges and solutions for the identification of membrane proteins in non-model plants. J Proteomics 2011, 74:1165-1181.
4. Mathias R.A., Chen Y.-S., Kapp E.A., Greening D.W., Mathivanan S., Simpson R.J. Triton X-114 phase separation in the isolation and purification of mouse liver microsomal membrane proteins. Methods 2011, 54:396-406.
5. Imming P., Sinning C., Meyer A. Drugs, their targets and the nature and number of drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006, 5:821-834.
6. Speers A.E., Wu C.C. Proteomics of integral membrane proteins - theory and application. Chem Rev 2007, 107:3687-3714.
7. Gilmore J.M., Washburn M.P. Advances in shotgun proteomics and the analysis of membrane proteomes. J Proteomics 2010, 73:2078-2091.
8. Van Summeren A., Renes J., Van Delft J.H.M., Kleinjans J.C.S., Mariman E.C.M. Proteomics in the search for mechanisms and biomarkers of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Toxicol in Vitro 2012, 26:373-385.
9. Huang H.-J., Tsai M.-L., Chen Y.-W., Chen S.-H. Quantitative shot-gun proteomics and MS-based activity assay for revealing gender differences in enzyme contents for rat liver microsome. J Proteomics 2011, 74:2734-2744.
10. Galeva N., Altermann M. Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis as a separation tool for proteomic analysis of rat liver microsomes: cytochromes P450 and other membrane proteins. Proteomics 2002, 2:713-722.
11. Galeva N., Yakovlev D., Koen Y., Duzhak T., Alterman M. Direct identification of cytochrome P450 isozymes by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight-based proteomic approach. Drug Metab Dispos 2003, 31:351-355.
12. Arnold R.J., Hrncirova P., Annaiah K., Novotny M.V. Fast proteolytic digestion coupled with organelle enrichment for proteomic analysis of rat liver. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:653-657.
13. Nisar S., Lane C.S., Wilderspin A.F., Welham K.J., Griffiths W.J., Patterson L.H. A proteomic approach to the identification of cytochrome P450 isoforms in male and female rat liver by nanoscale liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Metab Dispos 2004, 32:382-386.
14. Kanaeva I.P., Petushkova N.A., Lisitsa A.V., Lokhov P.G., Zgoda V.G., Karuzina I.I., et al. Proteomic and biochemical analysis of the mouse liver microsomes. Toxicol in Vitro 2005, 19:805-812.
15. Zgoda V.G., Moshkovskii S.A., Ponomarenko E.A., Andreewski T.V., Kopylov A.T., Tikhonova O.V., et al. Proteomics of mouse liver microsomes: performance of different protein separation workflows for LC-MS/MS. Proteomics 2009, 9:4102-4105.
16. Peng F., Zhan X., Li M.-Y., Fang F., Li G., Li C., et al. Proteomic and bioinformatics analyses of mouse liver microsomes. Int J Proteomics 2012, 2012:832569.
17. Seibert C., Davidson B.R., Fuller B.J., Patterson L.H., Griffiths W.J., Wang Y. Multiple-approaches to the identification and quantification of cytochromes P450 in human liver tissue by mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 2009, 8:1672-1681.
18. Petushkova N.A., Kanaeva I.P., Lisitsa A.V., Sheremetyeva G.F., Zgoda V.G., Samenkova N.F., et al. Characterization of human liver cytochromes P450 by combining the biochemical and proteomic approaches. Toxicol in Vitro 2006, 20:966-974.
19. Yukinaga H., Iwabuchi H., Okazaki O., Izumi T. Glutathione S-transferase pi trapping method for generation and characterization of drug-protein adducts in human liver microsomes using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2012, 67-68:186-192.
20. Washburn M.P., Wolters D., Yates J.R. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19:242-247.
21. Nägele E., Vollmer M., Hörth P., Vad C. 2D-LC/MS techniques for the identification of proteins in highly complex mixtures. Expert Rev Proteomics 2004, 1:37-46.
22. Khan M.F., Bennett M.J., Jumper C.C., Percy A.J., Silva L.P., Schriemer D.C. Proteomics by mass spectrometry - go big or go home?. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011, 55:832-841.
23. Walther T.C., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in cell biology. J Cell Biol 2010, 190:491-500.
24. Eichhorn P., Pérez S., Barceló D. Time-of-flight mass spectrometry versus orbitrap-based mass spectrometry for the screening and identification of drugs and metabolites: is there a winner?. Compr Anal Chem 2012, 58:217-272.
25. Griffin N.M., Schnitzer J.E. Overcoming key technological challenges in using mass spectrometry for mapping cell surfaces in tissues. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011, 10. [R110.000935].
26. Berridge G., Chalk R., D'Avanzo N., Dong L., Doyle D., Kim J.-I., et al. High-performance liquid chromatography separation and intact mass analysis of detergent-solubilized integral membrane proteins. Anal Biochem 2011, 410:272-280.
27. Chen E.I., Cociorva D., Norris J.L., Yates J.R. Optimization of mass spectrometry-compatible surfactants for shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:2529-2538.
28. Le Maire M., Champeil P., Moller J.V. Interaction of membrane proteins and lipids with solubilizing detergents. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000, 1508:86-111.
29. Yu Y., Gilar M., Lee P.J., Bouvier E.S.P., Gebler J.C. Enzyme-friendly, mass spectrometry-compatible surfactant for in-solution enzymatic digestion of proteins. Anal Chem 2003, 75:6023-6028.
30. Rietschel B., Arrey T.N., Meyer B., Bornemann S., Schuerken M., Karas M., et al. Elastase digests: new ammunition for shotgun membrane proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:1029-1043.
31. Han J., Schey K.L. Proteolysis and mass spectrometric analysis of an integral membrane: aquaporin 0. J Proteome Res 2004, 3:807-812.
32. Burkhart J.M., Schumbrutzki C., Wortelkamp S., Sickmann A., Zahedi R.P. Systematic and quantitative comparison of digest efficiency and specificity reveals the impact of trypsin quality on MS-based proteomics. J Proteomics 2012, 75:1454-1462.
33. Fischer F., Poetsch A. Protein cleavage strategies for an improved analysis of the membrane proteome. Proteome Sci 2006, 4:2.
34. Prabakaran S., Tepp W., Dasgupta B.R. Botulinum neurotoxin types B and E: purification, limited proteolysis by endoproteinase Glu-C and pepsin, and comparison of their identified cleaved sites relative to the three-dimensional structure of type A neurotoxin. Toxicon 2001, 39:1515-1531.
35. Distler A.M., Kerner J., Peterman S.M., Hoppel C.L. A targeted proteomic approach for the analysis of rat liver mitochondrial outer membrane proteins with extensive sequence coverage. Anal Biochem 2006, 356:18-29.
36. Han J., Pope M., Borchers C., Graves L.M. Mapping of protein phosphorylation by dual enzyme digestion and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-quadrupole orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 2002, 310:215-218.
37. Van Montfort B.A., Doeven M.K., Canas B., Veenhoff L.M., Poolman B., Robillard G.T. Combined in-gel tryptic digestion and CNBr cleavage for the generation of peptide maps of an integral membrane protein with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002, 1555:111-115.
38. Speers A.E., Blackler A.R., Wu C.C. Shotgun analysis of integral membrane proteins facilitated by elevated temperature. Anal Chem 2007, 79:4613-4620.
39. Reyes L.H., Encinar J.R., Marchante-Gayón J.M., Alonso J.I.G., Sanz-Medel A. Selenium bioaccessibility assessment in selenized yeast after "in vitro" gastrointestinal digestion using two-dimensional chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2006, 1110:108-116.
40. Mbeunkui F., Goshe M.B. Investigation of solubilization and digestion methods for microsomal membrane proteome analysis using data-independent LC-MSE. Proteomics 2011, 11:898-911.
41. Shilov I.V., Seymour S.L., Patel A.A., Loboda A., Tang W.H., Keating S.P., et al. The paragon algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1638-1655.
42. Tang W.H., Shilov I.V., Seymour S.L. Nonlinear fitting method for determining local false discovery rates from decoy database searches. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:3661-3667.
43. Vizcaíno J.A., Côté R., Reisinger F., Barsnes H., Foster J.M., Rameseder J., et al. The Proteomics Identifications database: 2010 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D736-D742.
44. Thomas P.D., Kejariwal A., Campbell M.J., Mi H., Diemer K., Guo N., et al. PANTHER: a browsable database of gene products organized by biological function, using curated protein family and subfamily classification. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:334-341.
45. Lynn D.J., Winsor G.L., Chan C., Richard N., Laird M.R., Barsky A., et al. InnateDB: facilitating systems-level analyses of the mammalian innate immune response. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4:218.
46. Barsky A., Gardy J.L., Hancock R.E.W., Munzner T. Cerebral: a Cytoscape plugin for layout of and interaction with biological networks using subcellular localization annotation. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1040-1042.
47. Del Vecchio P., Graziano G., Granata V., Barone G., Mandrich L., Rossi M., et al. Denaturing action of urea and guanidine hydrochloride towards two thermophilic esterases. Biochem J 2002, 367:857-863.
48. Blonder J., Conrads T.P., Yu L.-R., Terunuma A., Janini G.M., Issaq H.J., et al. A detergent- and cyanogen bromide-free method for integral membrane proteomics: application to Halobacterium purple membranes and the human epidermal membrane proteome. Proteomics 2004, 4:31-45.
49. Ye X., Johann D.J., Hakami R.M., Xiao Z., Meng Z., Ulrich R.G., et al. Optimization of protein solubilization for the analysis of the CD14 human monocyte membrane proteome using LC-MS/MS. J Proteomics 2009, 73:112-122.
50. Krogh A., Sonnhammer E.L.L., Käll L. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction - the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35:429-432.
51. Tsirigos K.D., Hennerdal A., Käll L., Elofsson A. A guideline to proteome-wide α-helical membrane protein topology predictions. Proteomics 2012, 12:2282-2294.
52. Xiong J. Essential Bioinformatics 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
53. Michel P.E., Reymond F., Arnaud I.L., Josserand J., Girault H.H., Rossier J.S. Protein fractionation in a multicompartment device using Off-Gel isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis 2003, 24:3-11.
54. Tran J.C., Doucette A.A. Gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis: an electrophoretic method for broad molecular weight range proteome separation. Anal Chem 2008, 80:1568-1573.