Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for entertainment media influences on tobacco use

Addiction

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 477-484

  Green, Melanie C ^a   Clark, Jenna L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Entertainment media; Movies; Narrative; Smoking; Tobacco; Transportation into narrative worlds

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; EMOTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EMOTIONS; HUMANS; MOTION PICTURES AS TOPIC; MOTIVATION; NARRATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84873973357     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04088.x     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Heatherton T., Sargent J. Does watching smoking in movies promote teenage smoking? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2009; 18: 63-67.
2. Morgenstern M., Poelen E. A., Scholte R., Karlsdottir S., Jonsson S. H., Mathis F. etal. Smoking in movies and adolescent smoking: cross-cultural study in six European countries. Thorax 2011; 66: 875-883.
3. Dal Cin S., Worth K. A., Gerrard M., Gibbons F. X., Sargent J. D. Watching and drinking: expectancies, prototypes, and friends' alcohol use mediate the effect of exposure to alcohol use in movies on adolescent drinking. Health Psychol 2009; 28: 473-483.
4. Sargent J., Wills T., Stoolmiller M., Gibson J., Gibbons F. Alcohol use in motion pictures and its relation with early-onset teen drinking. J Stud Alcohol 2006; 67: 54-65.
5. Green M., Brock T. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000; 79: 701-721.
6. Green M., Brock T. In the mind's eye: transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In: Green M. C., Strange J. J., Brock T. C., editors. Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002, p. 315-341.
7. Bruner J. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1986.
8. Kreuter M., Green M., Cappella J., Slater M., Wise M., Storey D. etal. Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application. Anns Behav Med 2007; 33: 221-235.
9. Marsh E., Meade M., Roediger H. Learning facts from fiction. J Mem Lang 2003; 49: 519-536.
10. Marsh E., Fazio L. Learning errors from fiction: difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories. Mem Cognit 2006; 34: 1140-1149.
11. Prentice D., Gerrig R., Bailis D. What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychon Bull Rev 1997; 4: 416-420.
12. Wheeler S., Green M., Brock T. Fictional narratives change beliefs: replications of Prentice, Gerrig, & Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration. Psychon Bull Rev 1999; 6: 136-141.
13. Strange J., Leung C. How anecdotal accounts in news and in fiction can influence judgments of a social problem's urgency, causes, and cures. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1999; 25: 436-449.
14. Kreuter M. W., Holmes K., Alcaraz K., Kalesan B., Rath S., Richert M. etal. Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 81: 6-14.
15. Williams J. H., Green M. C., Houston T. K., Allison J. J. Stories to communicate risks about tobacco: development of a brief scale to measure transportation into a video story. Health Educ J 2011; 70: 184-191.
16. Escalas J. Imaging yourself in the product: mental simulation, narrative transportation, and persuasion. J Advert 2004; 33: 3337-3348.
17. Wang J., Calder B. Media transportation and advertising. J Consum Res 2006; 33: 151-162.
18. Dunlop S., Wakefield M., Kashima Y. Pathways to persuasion: cognitive and experiential responses to health-promoting mass media messages. Communic Res 2010; 37: 133-164.
19. Green M., Garst J., Brock T., Chung S. Fact versus fiction labeling: persuasion parity despite heightened scrutiny of fact. Media Psychol 2006; 6: 267-285.
20. Caputo M. N., Rouner D. Narrative processing of entertainment media and mental illness stigma. Health Commun 2011; 26: 595-604.
21. Slater M. Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In: Green M. C., Strange J. J., Brock T. C., editors. Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002, p. 157-181.
22. Singhal A., Cody M., Rogers E., Sabido M. Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2004.
23. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
24. Bandura A., Ross D., Ross S. Vicarious reinforcement and imitative learning. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1963; 67: 601-607.
25. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In: Bryant J., Zillman D., editors. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. NJ: Erlbaum: Hillsdale; 1994, p. 61-90.
26. Gerbner G., Gross L. Living with television: the violence profile. J Commun 1976; 26: 173-179.
27. Gerbner G., Gross L., Morgan M., Signorielli N. Living with television: the dynamics of the cultivation process. In: Bryant J., Zillman D., editors. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. NJ: Erlbaum: Hillsdale; 1986, p. 17-40.
28. Shrum L., Lee J., Burroughs J., Rindfleisch A. An online process model of second-order cultivation effects: how television cultivates materialism and its consequences for life satisfaction. Hum Commun Res 2011; 37: 34-57.
29. Potter W. J. Cultivation theory and research: a conceptual critique. Hum Commun Res. 1993; 19: 564-601.
30. Hammersley R. Cue exposure and learning theory. Addict Behav 1992; 17: 297-300.
31. Abrams D. B., Monti P. M., Carey K. B., Pinto R. P., Jacobus S. I. Reactivity to smoking cues and relapse: two studies of discriminant validity. Behav Res Ther 1988; 26: 225-233.
32. Dal Cin S., Zanna M., Fong G. Narrative persuasion and overcoming resistance. In: Resistance O., In Knowles E. S., Linn J. A., editors. Resistance and Persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2004, p. 175-191.
33. Mazzocco P., Green M. C., Sasota J., Jones N. This story is not for everyone: transportability and narrative persuasion. Soc Psychol Pers Sci 2010; 1: 361-368.
34. Appel M., Richter T. Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: a mediated moderation model. Media Psychol 2010; 13: 101-135.
35. Maio G., Esses V. The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. J Pers 2001; 69: 583-615.
36. Rideout V., Foehr U., Roberts D. Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18- year olds. January, 2010. Available at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf (accessed 12 October 2012; archived at www.webcitation.org/6BMaOAHzI).
37. Meeus W. The study of adolescent identity formation 2000-2010: a review of longitudinal research. J Res Adolesc 2011; 21: 75-94.
38. Steinberg L., Monahan K. Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Dev Psychol 2007; 43: 1531-1543.
39. Bracken C. Presence and image quality: the case of high-definition television. Media Psychol 2005; 7: 191-205.
40. Cacioppo J., Petty R., Kao C. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. J Pers Assess 1984; 48: 306-307.
41. Green M. C., Kass S., Carrey J., Feeney R., Herzig B., Sabini J. Transportation across media: print versus film comparisons. Media Psychol 2008; 11: 512-539.
42. Slater M., Rouner D. Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Commun Theory 2002; 12: 173-191.
43. Davison W. P. The third person effect revisited. Int J Public Opin Res 1996; 8: 113-119.
44. Cialdini R., Petty R. Anticipatory opinion effects. In: Petty R., Ostrom T. M., Brock T. C., editors. Cognitive Responses in Persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1981, p. 217-235.
45. Moyer-Guse E., Nabi R. Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: overcoming resistance to persuasion. Hum Commun Res 2010; 36: 26-52.
46. Sestir M., Green M. You are who you watch: identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept. Soc Influence 2010; 5: 272-288.
47. Cohen J. Audience identification with media characters. In: Bryant J., Vorderer P., editors. Psychology of Entertainment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006, p. 183-197.
48. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychol 2001; 3: 265-299.
49. Dal Cin S., Gibson B., Zanna M., Shumate R., Fong G. Smoking in movies, implicit associations of smoking with the self, and intentions to smoke. Psychol Sci 2007; 18: 559-563.
50. Tanski S. E., Stoolmiller M., Dal Cin S., Worth K. A., Gibson J. J., Sargent J. D. Movie character smoking and adolescent smoking: who matters more, good guys or bad guys? Pediatrics 2009; 124: 135-143.
51. Tanski S. E., Stoolmiller M., Gerrard M., Sargent J. D. Moderation of the association between media exposure and youth smoking onset: race/ethnicity, and parent smoking. Prev Sci 2011; 13: 55-63.
52. Fazio R., Zanna M. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In: Berkowitz L., editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1981, p. 161-202.
53. Gordon R., Gerrig R., Franklin N. Qualitative characteristics of memories for real, imagined, and media-based events. Discourse Process 2009; 46: 70-91.
54. Durkin S., Wakefield M. Interrupting a narrative transportation experience: program placement effects on responses to antismoking advertising. J Health Commun 2008; 13: 667-680.
55. Edwards K. The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59: 202-216.
56. Wagner D., Dal Cin S., Sargent J., Kelley W., Heatherton T. Spontaneous action representation in smokers when watching movie characters smoke. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 894-898.
57. Gibbons F. X., Pomery E. A., Gerrard M., Sargent J. D., Weng C.-Y., Wills T. A. etal. Media as social influence: racial differences in the effects of peers and media on adolescent alcohol cognitions and consumption. Psychol Addict Behav 2010; 24: 649-659.
58. Hanewinkel R., Isensee B., Sargent J., Morgenstern M. Effect of an antismoking advertisement on cinema patrons' perception of smoking and intention to smoke: a quasi-experimental study. Addiction 2010; 105: 1269-1277.
59. Green M., Donahue J. Persistence of belief change in the face of deception: the effect of factual stories revealed to be false. Media Psychol 2011; 14: 312-331.
60. Sagarin B., Cialdini R., Rice W., Serna S. Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: the motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 83: 526-541.
61. Sargent J., Maruska K., Morgenstern M., Isensee B., Hanewinkel R. Movie smoking, movie horror, and urge to smoke. Przegl Lek 2009; 66: 545-547.
62. Koordeman R., Anschutz D., van Baaren R., Engels R. Effects of alcohol portrayals in movies on actual alcohol consumption: an observational experimental study. Addiction [serial online] 2011; 106: 547-554.
63. Koordeman R., Kuntsche E., Anschutz D. J., van Baaren R. B., Engels R. E. Do we act upon what we see? Direct effects of alcohol cues in movies on young adults' alcohol drinking. Alcohol Alcohol 2011; 46: 393-398.
64. Green M., Brock T., Kaufman G. Understanding media enjoyment: the role of transportation into narrative worlds. Commun Theory 2004; 14: 311-327.
65. Dal Cin S., Stoolmiller M., Sargent J. D. When movies matter: exposure to smoking in movies and changes in smoking behavior. J Health Commun 2012; 17: 76-89.