The CTSA as an Exemplar Framework for Developing Multidisciplinary Translational Teams

Clinical and Translational Science

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 60-71

  Calhoun, William J ^a   Wooten, Kevin ^a,b   Bhavnani, Suresh ^a,c   Anderson, Karl E ^a,c   Freeman, Jean ^a,c   Brasier, Allan R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^c University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Multidisciplinary teams; Team science; Translational research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES AWARD; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; LEADERSHIP; MULTIDISCIPLINARY TRANSLATIONAL TEAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENCE; TEAM BUILDING; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

ASTHMA; AWARDS AND PRIZES; CLOSTRIDIUM INFECTIONS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; TEXAS; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84873724045     PISSN: 17528054     EISSN: 17528062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12004     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Borner K, Contractor N, Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Fiore SM, Hall, KL, Keyton, J, Spring B, Stokols D, Trochim W, Uzzi B. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Sci Translat Med. 2010; 2(49): 49cm24.
2. Jones BF, Wuchty S, Uzzi B. Multi-university research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science. 2008; 322(5905): 1259-1262.
3. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 2007; 316(5827): 1036-1039.
4. Adams JD, Black GC, Clemmons JR, Stephan PE. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. Res Pol. 2005; 34(3): 259-285.
5. Choi BC, Pak AW. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy. Part 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clin Invest Med. Medecine clinique et experimentale. 2007; 30(6): E224-232.
6. Fiore SM. Interdisciplinarity as teamwork. Small Group Res. 2008; 39(3): 251-277.
7. Disis ML, Slattery JT. The road we must take: multidisciplinary team science. Sci. Translat. Med. 2010; 2(22): 22cm29.
8. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008; 299(2): 211-213.
9. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Jr, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, Sherwood LM, Johnson, SB, Catanese V, Tilson, H, Getz K, Larson EL, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003; 289(10): 1278-1287.
10. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research-"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007; 297(4): 403-406.
11. Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Borner K, Contractor N, Fiore SM, Hall KL, Keyton J, Spring B, Stokols D, Trochim W, Uzzi B. Advancing the science of team science. Clin Translat Sci. 2010; 3(5): 263-266.
12. Hall KL, Feng AX, Moser RP, Stokols D, Taylor BK. Moving the science of team science forward: collaboration and creativity. Am J Prevent Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl): S243-249.
13. Stokols D, Misra S, Moser RP, Hall KL, Taylor BK. The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Prevent Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl): S96-115.
14. Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-finley S. Collaboration and Team Science: A field guide. 2010. https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/download/attachments/47284665/TeamScience_FieldGuide.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1271730182423.
15. Masse LC, Moser RP, Stokols D, Taylor BK, Marcus SE, Morgan GD, Hall KL, Croyle RT, Trochim WM. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. Am J Prevent Med. 2008; 35(2 Suppl): S151-160.
16. Isohanni M, Isohanni I, Veijola J. How should a scientific team be effectively formed and managed. Nord J Psychiatry. 2002; 56(2): 157-162.
17. Rubio DM, Schoenbaum EE, Lee LS, Schteingart DE, Marantz PR, Anderson KE, Platt LD, Baez A, Esposito K. Defining translational research: implications for training. Acad Med: J Assoc Am Med Colleges. 2010; 85(3): 470-475.
18. McGuire DB. Building and maintaining a multidisciplinary research team. Alzheimers Dis Assoc Disord. 1999; 13(1): S17-S21.
19. Aboelela SW, Larson E, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Glied SA, Haas J, Gebbie KM. Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42(1p1): 329-346.
20. Fennell ML, Prabhu Das I, Clauser S, Petrelli N, Salner A. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. JNCI Monogr. 2010(40): 72-80.
21. Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review: MCRR. 2006; 63(3): 263-300.
22. Delva D, Jamieson M, Lemieux M. Team effectiveness in academic primary health care teams. J Interprof Care. 2008; 22(6): 598-611.
23. Korner M. Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach. Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24(8): 745-755.
24. Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JD, van Wijk KP. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. Health Pol. 2010; 94(3): 183-195.
25. Naylor MD, Feldman PH, Keating S, Koren MJ, Kurtzman ET, Maccoy MC, Krakauer R. Translating research into practice: transitional care for older adults. J Evaluat Clin Pract. 2009; 15(6): 1164-1170.
26. Cohen SG, Bailey DE. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive level. J Manag. 1997; 23(3): 239-290.
27. Hackman JR. The design of work teams. In: Lorsch JW, ed. Handbook of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1987: 315-342.
28. Gladstein D. Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness. Admin Sci Quart. 1984; 29(4): 499-517.
29. Sundstrom E, DeMuse KP, Futrall D. Work teams: applications and effectiveness. Am Psychol. 1990; 45(2): 120-133.
30. Guzzo RA, Dickson MW. Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. Ann Rev Psychol. 1996; 47: 307-338.
31. Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR. Enhacing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychol Sci Pub Interest. 2006; 7(3): 77-124.
32. Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D. Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. Ann Rev Psychol. 2005; 56: 517-543.
33. Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad Manag Rev. 2001; 26(3): 356-376.
34. Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manag. 2008; 34(3): 410-476.
35. Bullinger HJ, Warschat J, Fischer D. Rapid product development-an overview. Comput Ind. 2000; 42(2-3): 99-108.
36. Harmancioglu N, McNally RC, Calantone RJ, Durmusoglu SS. Your new product development (NPD) is only as good as your process: an exploratory analysis of new NPD process design and implementation. R&D Manag. 2007; 37(5): 399-424.
37. Committee CEKF. Core competencies in clinical and translational sciences. 2011. https://www.ctsacentral.org/core-competencies-clinical-and-translational-research.
38. Hirschfeld RR, Jordan MH, Feild HS, Giles WF, Armenakis AA. Becoming team players: team members' mastery of teamwork knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and observed teamwork effectiveness. J Appl Psychol 2006; 91(2): 467-474.
39. Volpe CE, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Spector PE. The impact of cross-training on team functioning: an empirical investigation. Human Factors: J Human Factors Ergonom Soc. 1996; 38(1): 87-100.
40. Salas E, Rozell D, Mullen B, Driskell JE. The effect of team building on performance. Small Group Res. 1999; 30(3): 309-329.
41. Burke CS, Stagl KC, Salas E, Pierce L, Kendall D. Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(6): 1189-1207.
42. Savelsbergh CMJH, van der Heijden BIJM, Poell RF. The development and empirical validation of a multidimensional measurement instrument for team learning behaviors. Small Group Res. 2009; 40(5): 578-607.
43. Wong S-S. Distal and local group learning: performance trade-offs and tensions. Organ Sci. 2004; 15(6): 645-656.
44. Van der Vegt GS, Janssen O. Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. J Manage. 2003; 29(5): 729-751.
45. Fay D, Borrill C, Amir Z, Haward R, West MA. Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2006; 79(4): 553-567.
46. Jin L, Sun H. The effect of researchers' interdisciplinary characteristics on team innovation performance: evidence from university R&D teams in China. Int. J. Human Res. Manag. 2010; 21(13): 2488-2502.
47. Humphrey SE, Morgeson FP, Mannor MJ. Developing a theory of the strategic core of teams: a role composition model of team performance. J Appl Psychol. 2009; 94(1): 48-61.
48. LePine JA, Piccolo RF, Jackson CL, Mathieu JE, Saul JR. A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychol. 2008; 61(2): 273-307.
49. Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad Manag. Rev. 2001; 26(3): 356-376.
50. Cummings JN, Kiesler S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2005; 35(5): 703-722.
51. Gully SM, Incalcaterra KA, Joshi A, Beaubien JM. A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J Appl Psychol. 2002; 87(5): 819-832.
52. Glynn MA, Kazanjian R, Drazin R. Fostering innovation in complex product development settings: The role of team member identity and interteam interdependence. J Product Innovat Manag. 2010; 27(7): 1082-1095.
53. Wageman R. How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organ Sci. 2001; 12(5): 559-577.
54. Elkins T, Keller RT. Leadership in research and development organizations: a literature review and conceptual framework. Leadership Quart. 2003; 14(4-5): 587-606.
55. Wang S, Noe RA. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Hum Resour Manage R. 2010; 20(2): 115-131.
56. Kerr DS, Murthy US. Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: a comparison of, computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Group Decis Negot. 2004; 13(4): 381-399.
57. Zerhouni EA. Clinical research at a crossroads: The NIH roadmap. J. Investigat. Med.: Official Publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research. 2006; 54(4): 171-173.
58. Brasier AR, Victor S, Boetticher G, Ju H, Lee C, Bleecker ER, Castro M, Busse WW, Calhoun WJ. Molecular phenotyping of severe asthma using pattern recognition of bronchoalveolar lavage-derived cytokines. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 121(1): 30-37 e36.
59. Brasier AR, Victor S, Ju H, Busse WW, Curran-Everett D, Bleecker ER, Castro M, Chung KF, Gaston B, Israel E, et al. Predicting intermediate phenotypes in asthma using bronchoalveolar lavage-derived cytokines. Clin Translat Sci. 2010; 3(4): 147-157.
60. Bhavnani SK, Victor S, Calhoun WJ, Busse WW, Bleecker ER, Castro M, Ju H, Pillai R, Oezguean N, Bellala G, Brasier AR. How cytokines co-occur across asthma patients: from bipartite network analysis to a molecular-based classification. J Biomed Informat. 2011; 44(Suppl 1): S24-30.
61. Savidge TC, Urvil P, Oezguen N, Ali K, Choudhury A, Acharya V, Pinchuk I, Torres AG, English RD, Wiktorowicz JE, et al. Host S-nitrosylation inhibits clostridial small molecule-activated glucosylating toxins. Nature Med. 2011; 17(9): 1136-1141.
62. Linlin J, Haifa S. The effect of researchers' interdisciplinary characteristics on team innovation performance: evidence from university R&D teams in China. Int J Human Res Manag. 2011; 21(3): 2488-2502.
63. Staples DS, Webster J. Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Informat Syst J. 2008; 18(6): 617-640.
64. Chou LF, Wang AC, Wang TYT, Huang MP, Cheng B. Shared work values and team member effectiveness: the mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Hum Relat. 2008; 61(12): 1713-1742.
65. Barczak G, Lassk F, Mulki J. Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust, and collaboration culture. Creativ Innovat. 2010; 19(4): 332-345.
66. Bhavnani SK, Farroni J, Crowder J, McKinney EB, Pillai R, Calhoun WJ, Rose RM, Carter MA. The role of method intuition in translational ethics. Proceedings of AMIA Summit on Translational Bioinformatics. 2012: pg. 141. http://proceedings.amia.org/2351e5/2351e5/1.
67. Tannenbaum SI, Beard RL, Salas E. Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: an examination of conceptual and empirical development. In: Kelly K, ed. Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1992: 117-154.
68. Hoegl M, Gemeunden HG. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organizat Sci. 2001; 12(4): 435-449.
69. Morgan BB, Salas E, Glickman AS. An analysis of team evolution and maturation. J Gen Psychol. 1994; 120(3): 227-291.
70. Arrow H, Henry KB, Poole MS, Wheelan S, Moreland RL. Traces, trajectories and timing: the temporal perspective of groups. In: Poole MS, Hollingshead AB, eds. Theories of Small Groups: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005: 313-368.
71. Trochim W, Kane C, Graham MJ, Pincus HA. Evaluating translational research: a process marker model. Clin Translat Sci. 2011; 4(3): 153-162.