Language in dialogue: When confederates might be hazardous to your data

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 54-72

  Kuhlen, Anna K ^a   Brennan, Susan E ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confederates; Dialogue; Psycholinguistics; Social cognition; Speech perception; Speech production

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873185527     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0341-8     Document Type: Article

References (175)

1. Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., & Harnish, R. M. (1987). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology, vol. 1 (1st ed., pp. 3-56). Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
3. Allport, G. W. (1969). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, vol. 1 (2nd ed., pp. 1-80). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
4. Allport, G. W. (1985). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, vol. 1 (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1-46). New York: Random House.
5. Arnold, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Altmann, R. J., & Fagnano, M. (2004). The old and thee, uh, new: Disfluency and reference resolution. Psychological Science, 15, 578-582. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2004. 00723. x.
6. Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35. doi: 10. 1038/scientificamerican1155-31.
7. Banaji, M. R., & Crowder, R. G. (1989). The bankruptcy of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 44, 1185-1193. doi: 10. 1037/0003-066X. 44. 9. 1185.
8. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.
9. Bangerter, A. (2004). Using pointing and describing to achieve joint focus of attention in dialogue. Psychological Science, 15, 415-419. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2004. 00694. x.
10. Bard, E. A., Anderson, A. H., Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Newlands, A. (2000). Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 1-22.
11. Barr, D. J. (2008). Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition, 109, 18-40.
12. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391-418.
13. Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2005). Mindreading in an exotic case: The normal adult human. In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and other (pp. 271-283). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644-675.
15. Bavelas, J. B. (2005). The two solitudes: Reconciling social psychology and language and social interaction. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 179-200). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
16. Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163-194.
17. Bavelas, J. B., & Chovil, N. (2006). Hand gestures and facial displays as part of language use in face- to-face dialogue. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), Handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 97-115). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
18. Bavelas, J. B., & Coates, L. (1992). How do we account for the mindfulness of face-to-face dialogue? Communication Monographs, 59, 301-305.
19. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 941-952.
20. Bavelas, J. B., Gerwing, J., Sutton, C., & Prevost, D. (2008). Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 495-520.
21. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. In N. Coupland & A. Jaworski (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: A reader and coursebook (pp. 240-250). New York: St Martin's Press.
22. Bergmann, J. R. (1981). Ethnomethodologische Konversationsanalyse. In P. Schröder & H. Steger (Eds.), Dialogforschung: Jahrbuch 1980 des Instituts für deutsche Sprache (pp. 9-51). Düsseldorf: Schwann.
23. Bless, H., Strack, F., & Schwarz, N. (1993). The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 149-165.
24. Bock, J. K. (1996). Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 395-421.
25. Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13-B25.
26. Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., & Cleland, A. A. (2007). Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue. Cognition, 104, 163-197. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2006. 05. 006.
27. Brennan, S. E. (1990). Conversation as direct manipulation: An iconoclastic view. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 393-404). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
28. Brennan, S. E. (1991). Conversation with and through computers. User Modeling and User-Adopted Interaction, 1, 67-86.
29. Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (pp. 95-129). Cambridge: MIT Press.
30. Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1482-1493. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 22. 6. 1482.
31. Brennan, S. E., & Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274-296. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 2000. 2753.
32. Brennan, S. E., & Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 383-398.
33. Brown, P. M., & Dell, G. S. (1987). Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention of instruments. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 441-472.
34. Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 171-190. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2009. 04. 003.
35. Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use. Language & Cognitive Processes, 27, 62-89.
36. Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122-1134. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2007. 11. 005.
37. Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science, 32, 643-684.
38. Bruehl, D., & Solar, D. (1970). Systematic variation in the clarity of demand characteristics in an experiment employing a confederate. Psychological Report, 27, 55-60.
39. Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (2004). Essays in social neuroscience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40. Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1-15. doi: 10. 1017/S0140525X00001515. disc. 15-61.
43. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington: American Psychological Association.
45. Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58, 332-373.
46. Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 62-81. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2003. 08. 004.
47. Clark, H. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1983). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J. F. LeNy & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287-299). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
48. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
49. Congdon, S. P., & Schober, M. F. (2002, November). How examiners' discourse cues affect scores on intelligence tests. Paper presented at the 43th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.
50. Conrad, F. G., & Schober, M. F. (2000). Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 1-28.
51. Cozby, P. C. (1972). Self-disclosure, reciprocity, and liking. Sociometry, 35, 151-160.
52. Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 292-314.
53. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can social interaction constitute social cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 441-447. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2010. 06. 009.
54. Deppermann, A. (2008). Gespräche analysieren: Eine Einführung (4th ed.). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
55. De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Predicting the end of a speaker's turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82, 515-535.
56. Duncan, S., Kanki, B. G., Mokros, H., & Fiske, D. W. (1984). Pseudounilaterality, simple-rate variables, and other ills to which interaction research is heir. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1335-1348.
57. Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510-517.
58. Ekeocha, J. O., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). Collaborative recall in face-to-face and electronic groups. Memory, 16, 245-261.
59. Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2005). The production and comprehension of resumptive pronouns in relative clause "island" contexts. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 263-278). Mahway: Erlbaum.
60. Ferreira, V. S., & Dell, G. S. (2000). The effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 296-340.
61. Ferreira, V. S., Slevc, L. R., & Rogers, E. S. (2005). How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions? Cognition, 96, 263-284. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2004. 09. 002.
62. Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (2010). Handbook of social psychology (5th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
63. Forster, K. I., & Masson, M. E. J. (Eds.). (2008). Emerging data analysis [Special Issue]. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4).
64. Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709-738.
65. Friedman, N. (1967). The social nature of psychological research. New York: Basic Books.
66. Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2010). The social brain: Allowing humans to boldly go where no other species has been. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 165-176. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2009. 0160.
67. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989). Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 509-525.
68. Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.
69. Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2006). Given-new attenuation effects in spoken discourse: For the speaker, or for the addressee? In Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 47th Annual Meeting (p. 15). Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society Publications.
70. Galati, A., & Brennan, S. E. (2010). Attenuating information in spoken communication: For the speaker, or for the addressee? Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 35-51. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2009. 09. 002.
71. Garfinkel, H. (1952). The perception of the other: A study in social order. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
72. Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with "trust" as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction, cognitive determinants (pp. 187-238). New York: Ronald Press.
73. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
74. Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20, 393-398.
75. Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York: Halsted Press.
76. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
77. Goodwin, M. H. (1985). The serious side of jump rope: Conversational practices and social organization in the frame of play. Journal of American Folklore, 98, 315-330.
78. Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 596-615.
79. Hanna, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105-115. doi: 10. 1016/j. cogsci. 2003. 10. 002.
80. Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43-61. doi: 10. 1016/S0749-596X(03)00022-6.
81. Hari, R., & Kujala, M. V. (2009). Brain basis of human social interaction: From concepts to brain imaging. Physiological Reviews, 89, 453-479.
82. Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. L. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? Memory, 16, 213-230.
83. Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409-414. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2004. 00693. x.
84. Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 114-121. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2011. 12. 007.
85. Haywood, S. L., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (2005). Do speakers avoid ambiguity during dialogue? Psychological Science, 16, 362-366. doi: 10. 1111/j. 0956-7976. 2005. 01541. x.
86. Healey, P. G. T., Purver, M., King, J., Ginzburg, J., & Mills, G. J. (2003). Experimenting with clarification in dialogue. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 539-544). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
87. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
88. Holler, J., & Wilkin, K. (2009). Communicating common ground: How mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 267-289.
89. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
90. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794-798.
91. Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91-117. doi: 10. 1016/0010-0277(96)81418-1.
92. Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2006). Using interactive tasks to elicit natural dialogue. In P. Augurzky & D. Lenertova (Eds.), Methods in empirical prosody research (pp. 229-257). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
93. Jacobs, N., & Garnham, A. (2007). The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 291-303.
94. Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
95. Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (2010). Dyadic data analysis using multilevel modeling. In J. J. Hox & J. K. Roberts (Eds.), The handbook of advanced multilevel analysis (pp. 355-371). New York: Routledge.
96. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
97. Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Small group decision making and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-656.
98. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science, 11, 32-38. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00211.
99. Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Paek, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1-20.
100. Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25-41. doi: 10. 1016/S0010-0277(03)00064-7.
101. Korte, C., Ypma, A., & Toppen, C. (1975). Helpfulness in Dutch society as a function of urbanization and environmental input level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 996-1003.
102. Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50, 194-231.
103. Krauss, R. M. (1987). The role of the listener: Addressee influences on message formulation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 81-97.
104. Kronmüller, E., & Barr, D. J. (2007). Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 436-455.
105. Kuhlen, A. K. (2010). Assessing and accommodating addressees' needs: The role of speakers' prior expectations and addressees' needs. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 71, 7128.
106. Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2010). Anticipating distracted addressees: How speakers' expectations and addressees' feedback influence storytelling. Discourse Processes, 47, 567-587.
107. Lakin, J. L., Chartrand, T. L., & Arkin, R. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816-822. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2008. 02162. x.
108. Laurens, S., & Moscovici, S. (2005). The confederate's and others' self-conversion: A neglected phenomenon. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 191-207.
109. Leander, N. P., Chartrand, T. L., & Wood, W. (2011). Mind your mannerisms: Behavioral mimicry elicits stereotype conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 195-201.
110. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London: Routledge.
112. Lockridge, C. B., & Brennan, S. E. (2002). Addressees' needs influence speakers' early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 550-557. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196312.
113. Martin, J. D. (1970). Suspicion and the experimental confederate: A study of role and credibility. Sociometry, 33, 178-192.
114. Martin, J. D. (1973). Pejorative factors in the suspicion of deception: The case of "detection" of confederates. Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 155-156.
115. Matthews, D., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2010). What's in a manner of speaking? children's sensitivity to partner-specific referential precedents. Developmental Psychology, 46, 749-760. doi: 10. 1037/a0019657.
116. Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 319-344.
117. Miles, L., Griffiths, J., Richardson, M., & Macrae, N. (2010). Too late to coordinate: Contextual influences on behavioral synchrony. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 52-60.
118. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.
119. Montague, P. R., Berns, G. S., Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G., Dhamala, M., & Fisher, R. E. (2002). Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions. NeuroImage, 16, 1159-1164.
120. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387. doi: 10. 1037/0003-066X. 38. 4. 379.
121. Mori, K., & Arai, M. (2010). No need to fake it: Reproduction of the Asch experiment without confederates. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 390-397.
122. Orne, M. T. (1959, September). The demand characteristics of an experimental design and their implications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Cincinnati, OH.
123. Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
124. Orne, M. T. (2002). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Prevention and Treatment, 5, n. p.
125. Ost, J., Ghonouie, H., Cook, L., & Vrij, A. (2008). The effects of confederate influence and confidence on the accuracy of crime judgements. Acta Psychologica, 128, 25-32. doi: 10. 1016/j. actpsy. 2007. 09. 007.
126. Page, R. A. (1977). Noise and helping behavior. Environment and Behavior, 9, 311-334.
127. Pasupathi, M., Stallworth, L. M., & Murdoch, K. (1998). How what we tell becomes what we know: Listener effects on speakers' long-term memory for events. Discourse Processes, 26, 1-25. doi: 10. 1080/01638539809545035.
128. Pfungst, O. (1907). Das Pferd des Herrn von Osten (Der kluge Hans) [Mr. van Osten's horse (Clever Hans)]. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.
129. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-225.
130. Reed, K., Peshkin, M., Hartmann, M. J., Grabowecky, M., Patton, J., & Vishton, P. M. (2006). Haptically linked dyads: Are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychological Science, 17, 365-366.
131. Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29, 1045-1060.
132. Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination: Common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychological Science, 18, 407-413.
133. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31, 62-79. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 31. 1. 62.
134. Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. C. (2011). Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 38. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00038.
135. Riley, M. A., & van Orden, G. C. (2005). Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences. Retrieved March 1, 2012, from www. nsf. gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs. jsp.
136. Roberts, G. K., & Bavelas, J. B. (1996). The communicative dictionary: A collaborative theory of meaning. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Beyond the symbol model: Reflections on the nature of language (pp. 139-164). Albany: SUNY Press.
137. Roediger, H. L., III, Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365-371. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196174.
138. Rosenberg, M. J. (1965). When dissonance fails: On eliminating evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 24-42.
139. Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
140. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. Urban Review, 3, 16-20.
141. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1992). Pygmalion in the classroom (Expandedth ed.). New York: Irvington.
142. Schafer, A. J., Speer, S. R., Warren, P., & White, S. D. (2000). Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 169-182.
143. Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., Vogeley, K. (in press). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
144. Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 123-164). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
145. Schober, M. F., & Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 211-232.
146. Schober, M. F., Conrad, F. G., & Fricker, S. S. (2004). Misunderstanding standardized language in research interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 169-188.
147. Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153-171.
148. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70-76.
149. Semin, G. R., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, entrainment, and coordination. In G. R. Semin & E. R. Smith (Eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches (pp. 119-148). New York: Cambridge University Press.
150. Semin, G. R., Garrido, M. V., & Palma, T. A. (2012). Socially situated cognition: Recasting social cognition as an emergent phenomenon. In S. T. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Eds.), Sage handbook of social cognition (pp. 138-165). Los Angeles: Sage. doi: 10. 4135/9781446247631. n8.
151. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
152. Shockley, K., Santana, M. V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 326-332.
153. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Emphatic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466-469. doi: 10. 1038/nature04271.
154. Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53-117.
155. Sobel, D. M., & Corriveau, K. H. (2010). Children monitor individuals' expertise for word learning. Child Development, 81, 669-679.
156. Solano, C. H. (1989). The interactive perspective: Getting the social back into social psychology. In M. Leary (Ed.), The state of social psychology: Issues, themes, controversies (pp. 35-44). Newbury Park: Sage.
157. Stent, A., Huffman, M. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). Adapting speaking after misrecognition: A study of hyperarticulation. Speech Communication, 50, 163-178.
158. Streeck, J. (2003). The body taken for granted: Lingering dualism in research on social interaction. In P. Glenn, C. D. LeBaron, & J. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper (pp. 427-440). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
159. Stricker, L. J., Messick, S., & Jackson, D. N. (1967). Suspicion of deception: Implications for conformity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 379-389.
160. Stricker, L. J., Messick, S., & Jackson, D. N. (1969). Evaluating deception in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 343-351. doi: 10. 1037/h0027232.
161. Swerts, M., & Krahmer, E. (2005). Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 81-94.
162. Tanenhaus, M. K., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2007). Language processing in the natural world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 1022-1105. doi: 10. 1098/rstb. 2007. 2162.
163. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634. doi: 10. 1126/science. 7777863.
164. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
165. Topál, J., Gergely, G., Miklósi, A., Erdöhegyi, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Infants' perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation. Science, 321, 1831-1834. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1161437.
166. Triplett, N. (1897). Social facilitation theory. The American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
167. Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, XLIX, 433-460.
168. van Berkum, J. J. A. (2012). The electrophysiology of discourse and conversation. In M. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. F. Joanisse (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589-614). New York: Cambridge University Press.
169. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
170. Wardlow Lane, L., Groisman, M., & Ferreira, V. S. (2006). Don't talk about pink elephants! speaker's control over leaking private information during language production. Psychological Science, 17, 273-277. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2006. 01697. x.
171. Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160-1175. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 23. 5. 1160.
172. Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Collaborative processes of language use in conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
173. Wilkes-Gibbs, D., & Clark, H. H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 31, 183-194. doi: 10. 1016/0749-596X(92)90010-U.
174. Yabar, Y., & Hess, U. (2007). Display of empathy and perception of out-group members. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36, 42-49.
175. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.