The production and comprehension of resumptive pronouns in relative clause “Island” contexts

Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 263-278

  Ferreira, Fernanda ^a   Swets, Benjamin ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85082893175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315084503-19     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2003). Disfluencies influence syntactic parsing.& Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 183-200.
2. Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2005). The disfluent hairy dog: Can syntactic parsing be affected by non-word disfluencies? In J. Trueswell & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions (pp. 303–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
4. Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93.
5. Bock, K., & Cutting, J. C. (1992). Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 99–127.
6. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
7. Creswell, C. (2002). Resumptive pronouns, wh-island violations, and sentence production. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Frameworks (TAG+6), 101–109. Università di Venezia.
8. Ferreira, F. (2000). Syntax in language production: An approach using tree-adjoining grammars. In L. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of language production (pp. 291–330). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
9. Ferreira, F., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2004). Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 231–237.
10. Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.
11. Ford, M., & Holmes, V. M. (1978). Planning units in sentence production. Cognition, 6, 35–53.
12. Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Language: Psychological and biological aspects (pp. 69–96). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Griffin, Z., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eves say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279.
14. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 310–339.
15. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Levelt, W. J. M., Richardson, G., & La Heij, W. (1985). Pointing and voicing in deictic expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 133–164.
17. Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.
18. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–190.
19. Prince, E. (1990). Syntax and discourse: A look at resumptive pronouns. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 16, 482–497.
20. Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.
21. Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (2001). Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production—an online study. Cognition, 78, 123–164.
22. Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Trueswell, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (Eds.). (2005). Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.