The two solitudes: Reconciling social psychology and language and social interaction

Handbook of Language and Social Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 179-200

  Bavelas, Janet Beavin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85079475844     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3-56). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modem social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1-80). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Allport, G. W. (1985). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1-46). New York: Random House.
4. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1-79). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Arundale, R. B., & Good, D. (2002). Boundaries and sequences in studying conversation. In A. Fetzer & C. Meierkord (Eds.), Rethinking sequentially (pp. 121-150). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.
7. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
10. Bavelas, J. B. (1983). Situations that lead to disqualification. Human Communication Research, 9, 130-145.
11. Bavelas, J. B. (1984). On "naturalistic" family research. Family Process, 23, 337-341.
12. Bavelas, J. B. (1987). Permitting creativity in science. In D. N.Jackson&J. P. Rushton(Eds.), Scientific excellence: Origins and assessment (pp. 307-327). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Bavelas, J. B. (1994). Gestures as part of speech: Methodological implications. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 201-221.
14. Bavelas, J. B. (1995). Quantitative versus qualitative? In W. Leeds-Hurwitz (Ed.), Social approaches to communication (pp. 49-62). New York: Guilford.
15. Bavelas, J. B. (1999). Come the millennium. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 5-10.
16. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., Lemery, C. R., & Mullen, J. (1988). Form and function in motor mimicry. Topographic evidence that the primary function is communicative. Human Communication Research, 14, 275-299.
17. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullett, J. (1990). Equivocal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986). "I show how you feel." Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 322-329.
19. Bavelas, J. B., &Chovil, N. (2000). Visible acts of meaning. An integrated message model of language use in face-to-face dialogue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 163-194.
20. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 941-952.
21. Bavelas, J. B., Coates, L., & Johnson, T. (2002). Listener responses as a collaborative process. The role of gaze. Journal of Communication, 52, 566-580.
22. Bavelas, J. B., Rogers, L. E., Millar, F. E. (1985). Interpersonal conflict. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis: Vol. 4. Discourse in society (pp. 9-26). London: Academic Press.
23. Bull, P. (1998). Equivocation theory and news interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 36-51.
24. Clark, H. H. (1985). Language and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 179-232). New York: Random House.
25. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
26. Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
27. Cottrell, L. S. (1942). The analysis of situational fields in social psychology. American Sociological Review, 7, 370-382.
28. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
29. Dashiell, J. F. (1935). Experimental studies of the influence of social situations on the behavior of individual human adults. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1097-1158). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
30. Deutsch, M. (1968). Field theory in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 412-487). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Einstein, A., Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
33. Forgas, J. P. (1983). What is social about social cognition? British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 129-144.
34. Fräser, C, & Scherer, K R. (1982). Introduction: Social psychological contributions to the study of language. In C. Fräser & K R. Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp. 1-10). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9, 205-217.
36. Harre, R., & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
38. Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction. In J. Heritage & J. M. Atkinson (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversational analysis (pp. 1-16). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
39. Johnson, T. (1992). Decision-making as a social process. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, British Colombia, Canada.
40. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Böiger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske&G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
41. Krauss, R. M., & Chiu, C.-Y. (1998). Language and social behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 41-88). Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
42. Kroger, R. O.&Wood, L. A. (1992). Whatever happened to language in social psychology? A survey of texts. Canadian Psychology, 33, 584-594.
43. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
44. Le Bon, G. (1895). La Psychologie desfoules. Paris: F. Olean. (Trans.), The crowd. (1896). London: T. Fisher Unwin.
45. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: I. Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 2-38.
46. Lubek, I.,&Appelbaum, E. (2000). Acriticalgaze and wistful glance MHandbook histories of social psychology: Did the successive accounts by Gordon Allport and successors historiographically succeed? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36, 405-428.
47. Luria, A. R. (1987). Reductionism in psychology. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp. 675-676). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
48. MacLennan, H. (1945). Two solitudes. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Collins.
49. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Tfie handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 137-230). New York: Random House.
50. McDougall, W. (1908). Introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen.
51. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
52. Milgram, S. (Producer). (1965). Obedience [Film and Video]. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
53. Moscovici, S. (1972). Society and theory in social psychology. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 17-68). London: Academic Press.
54. Pomerantz, A. (1990-1991). Mental concepts in the analysis of social action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 299-310.
55. Potter, J., & Wethereil, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
56. Reber, A. S. (1985). The Penguin dictionary of psychology. London, England: Penguin.
57. Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 21-43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Robinson, P. (1998). Language and social psychology: An intersection of opportunities and significance. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 276-302.
59. Robinson, P., & Giles, H. (Eds.). (1990). Handbook of language and social psychology (1st ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
60. Robinson, P., & Giles, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook oflanguage and social psychology (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
61. Ross, E. A. (1908). Social psychology. New York: Macmillan.
62. Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21-28). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
63. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. 2), G.Jefferson (Ed.), introduction by E. A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK Blackwell.
64. Sanders, R. E. (forthcoming). Testing "observations": The methodological televance of attention to cognition in discourse studies. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Discourse and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
66. Schneider, D.J. (1991). Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 527-561.
67. Sears, R. R. (1951). A theoretical framework for personality and social behavior. American Psychologist, 6, 476-483.
68. Senn, D. J. (1989). Myopic social psychology: An overemphasis on individualistic explanations of social behavior. In M. Leary (Ed.), The state of social psychology: Issues, themes, controversies (pp. 45-52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69. Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27, 1-60.
70. Skinner, B. F. (1959). A case history in scientific method. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. Study I. Conceptual and systematic: Vol. 2. General systematic formulations, learning and special processes (pp. 359-379). New York: McGraw-Hill.
71. Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Miller.
72. Smith, R. (1983). Social psychology and language: A taxonomy and overview. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 163-182.
73. Solano, C. H. (1989). The interactive perspective: Getting the social back into social psychology. In M. Leary (Ed.), The state of social psychology: Issues, themes, controversies (pp. 35-44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74. Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In J. Israel & H. Tajfel (Eds.), The context of social psychology: A critical assessment (pp. 69-119). London: Academic Press.
75. Thibaut, J. W, & Kelly, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
76. Watzlawick, P., Beavin Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication. New York: Norton.
77. Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78. Wright, H. W. (1947). The psychological centrality of communication. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1, 92-95.