Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 13-19

  Siegler, Robert S ^a,b   Fazio, Lisa K ^a   Bailey, Drew H ^a   Zhou, Xinlin ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Conceptual knowledge; Fraction arithmetic; Fractions; Magnitude representations; Numerical development; Procedural knowledge

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; FRACTIONS; MAGNITUDE REPRESENTATIONS; NUMERICAL DEVELOPMENT; PROCEDURAL KNOWLEDGE;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ARITHMETIC; COMPREHENSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FRACTION KNOWLEDGE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; KNOWLEDGE; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; REVIEW;

CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 84871712336     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.004     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Siegler R.S., et al. An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cogn. Psychol. 2011, 62:273-296.
2. Siegler R.S., et al. Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 23:691-697.
3. Bailey D.H., et al. Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2012, 113:447-455.
4. Ni Y., Zhou Y-D. Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: the origins and implications of whole number bias. Educ. Psychol. 2005, 40:27-52.
5. Vamvakoussi X., Vosniadou S. Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: a conceptual change approach. Learn. Instr. 2004, 14:453-467.
6. Vamvakoussi X., Vosniadou S. How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students' understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cogn. Instr. 2010, 28:181-209.
7. Ischebeck A., et al. The processing and representation of fractions within the brain: an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 2009, 47:403-413.
8. Jacob S.N., et al. Relating magnitudes: the brain's code for proportions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:157-166.
9. Schneider M., Siegler R.S. Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36:1227-1238.
10. Dehaene S. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Revised and Updated Edition 2011, Oxford University Press.
11. Opfer J.E., Siegler R.S. Development of quantitative thinking. Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning 2012, 585-605. Oxford University Press. K.J. Holyoak, R. Morrison (Eds.).
12. Geary D.C. Development of mathematical understanding. Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol 2, Cognition, Perception, and Language 2006, 777-810. John Wiley & Sons. D. Kuhn (Ed.).
13. Leslie A.M., et al. The generative basis of natural number concepts. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:213-218.
14. Wynn K. Do infants have numerical expectations or just perceptual preferences?. Dev. Sci. 2002, 2:207-209.
15. Sophian C. The Orgins of Mathematical Knowledge in Childhood (Studies in Mathematical Thinking and Learning) 2007, Erlbaum.
16. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Curriculum Focal Points for Prekindergarten through Grade 8 Mathematics 2006, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17. The Learning of Mathematics, 69th NCTM Yearbook 2007, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. W.G. Martin (Ed.).
18. Rittle-Johnson B., et al. Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: an iterative process. J. Educ. Psychol. 2001, 93:346-362.
19. Kloosterman P. Mathematics skills of 17-year-olds in the United States: 1978 to 2004. J. Res. Math. Educ. 2010, 41:20-51.
20. Stigler J.W., et al. What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics. MathAMATYC Educ. 2010, 10:4-16.
21. Chan W-H., et al. Exploring group-wise conceptual deficiences of fractions for fifth and sixth graders in Taiwan. J. Exp. Educ. 2007, 76:26-57.
22. Ni Y. Semantic domains of rational numbers and the acquisition of fraction equivalence. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2001, 26:400-417.
23. Yoshida H., Sawano K. Overcoming cognitive obstacles in learning fractions: equal-partitioning and equal-whole. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 2002, 44:183-195.
24. Mack N.K. Learning rational numbers with understanding. The case of informal knowledge. Rational Numbers: An Integration of Research 1993, 85-105. Erlbaum. T.P. Carpenter (Ed.).
25. McCrink K., Wynn K. Ratio abstraction by 6-month-old infants. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18:740-745.
26. Lipton J.S., Spelke E.S. Origins of number sense: large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychol. Sci. 2003, 14:396-401.
27. Baillargeon R., et al. The development of young infants' intuitions about support. Early Dev. Parent. 1992, 1:69-78.
28. Goswami U. Relational complexity and the development of analogical reasoning. Cogn. Dev. 1989, 4:251-268.
29. Goswami U. Transitive relational mappings in three- and four-year-olds: the analogy of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Child Dev. 1995, 66:877-892.
30. Spinillo A.G., Bryant P. Children's proportional judgments: the importance of 'half'. Child Dev. 1991, 62:427-440.
31. Spinillo A.G., Bryant P.E. Proportional reasoning in young children: Part-part comparisons about continuous and discontinuous quantity. Math. Cogn. 1999, 5:181-197.
32. Boyer T.W., et al. Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong. Dev. Psychol. 2008, 44:1478-1490.
33. Boyer T.W., Levine S.C. Child proportional scaling: is 1/3 = 2/6 = 3/9 = 4/12?. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 2012, 111:516-533.
34. Jeong Y., et al. The development of proportional reasoning: effect of continuous versus discrete quantities. J. Cogn. Dev. 2007, 8:237-256.
35. Singer-Freeman K.E., Goswami U. Does half a pizza equal half a box of chocolates? Proportional matching in an analogy task. Cogn. Dev. 2001, 16:811-829.
36. Bialystock E., Codd J. Representing quantity beyond whole numbers: Some, none and part. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2000, 54:117-128.
37. Sophian C., et al. When three is less than two: early developments in children's understanding of fractional quantities. Dev. Psychol. 1997, 33:731-744.
38. Frydman O., Bryant P.E. Sharing and the understanding of number equivalence by young children. Cogn. Dev. 1988, 3:323-339.
39. Wing R.E., Beal C.R. Young children's judgments about the relative size of shared portions: the role of material type. Math. Think. Learn. 2004, 6:1-14.
40. Hecht S.A., Vagi K.J. Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. J. Educ. Psychol 2010, 102:843-859.
41. Siegler, R.S. and Pyke, A.A. Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Dev. Psychol. doi:10.1037/a0031200.
42. Smith C.L., et al. Never getting to zero: elementary school students' understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter. Cogn. Psychol. 2005, 51:101-140.
43. Stafylidou S., Vosniadou S. The development of students' understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learn. Instr. 2004, 14:503-518.
44. Mix K.S., et al. Early fraction calculation ability. Dev. Psychol. 1999, 35:164-174.
45. Byrnes J.P., Wasik B.A. Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematical procedural learning. Dev. Psychol. 1991, 27:777-786.
46. Hecht S.A., et al. Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2003, 86:277-302.
47. Hecht S.A. Toward an information-processing account of individual differences in fraction skills. J. Educ. Psychol. 1998, 90:545-559.
48. Hallett D., et al. Individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge when learning fractions. J. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 102:395-406.
49. Paik J.H., Mix K.S. U.S. and Korean children's comprehension of fraction names: a reexamination of cross-national differences. Child Dev. 2003, 74:144-154.
50. Miura I.T., et al. Language supports for children's understanding of numerical fractions: cross-national comparisons. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 1999, 74:356-365.
51. Booth J.L., Newton K.J. Fractions: could they really be the gatekeeper's doorman?. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2012, 37:247-253.
52. Halford G.S., et al. Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:236-242.
53. Schneider M., et al. Mental number line, number line estimation, and mathematical achievement: their interrelations in grades 5 and 6. J. Educ. Psychol. 2009, 101:359-372.
54. Jacob S.N., Nieder A. Notation-independent representation of fractions in the human parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:4652-4657.
55. Schmithorst V.J., Brown R.D. Empirical validation of the triple-code model of numerical processing for complex math operations using functional MRI and group Independent Component Analysis of the mental addition and subtraction of fractions. Neuroimage 2004, 22:1414-1420.
56. Dehaene S., et al. Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 2003, 20:487-506.
57. Fujimura N. Facilitating children's proportional reasoning: a model of reasoning processes and effects of intervention on strategy change. J. Educ. Psychol. 2001, 93:589-603.
58. Keijzer R., Terwel J. Learning for mathematical insight: a longitudinal comparative study on modeling. Learn. Instr. 2003, 13:285-304.
59. Moss J., Case R. Developing children's understanding of the rational numbers: a new model and an experimental curriculum. J. Res. Math. Educ. 1999, 30:122-147.
60. th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapters of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2002, 969-978. D.S. Mewborn (Ed.).
61. Rittle-Johnson B., Koedinger K. Iterating between lessons on concepts and procedures can improve mathematics knowledge. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2009, 79:483-500.
62. Fuchs, L.S. et al. Improving at-risk learners' understanding of fractions. J. Educ. Psychol. (in press).