Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper's doorman?

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 247-253

  Booth, Julie L ^a   Newton, Kristie J ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognition; Fraction knowledge; Mathematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864751016     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alibali M.W., Knuth E.J., Hattikudur S., McNeil N.M., Stephens A.C. A longitudinal look at middle-school students' understanding of the equal sign and equivalent equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2007, 9:221-247.
2. Asquith P.S., Stephens A.C., Knuth E.J., Alibali M.W. Middle-school mathematics teachers' knowledge of students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2007, 9:247-270.
3. Behr M.J., Harel G., Post T., Lesh R. Rational number, ratio, and proportion. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning 1992, 296-333. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. D.A. Grouws (Ed.).
4. Booth, J. L., & Davenport, J. L. (submitted for publication). The role of conceptual knowledge and encoding in algebraic equation-solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior.
5. Booth J.L., Koedinger K.R. Key misconceptions in algebraic problem solving. Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the cognitive science society 2008, 571-576. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. B.C. Love, K. McRae, V.M. Sloutsky (Eds.).
6. Booth J.L., Siegler R.S. Developmental and individual differences in numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology 2006, 41:189-201.
7. Booth J.L., Siegler R.S. Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development 2008, 79(4):1016-1031.
8. Brown G., Quinn R. Fraction proficiency and success in algebra. Australian Mathematics Teacher 2007, 63(3):23-30.
9. Byrnes J.P., Wasik B.A. Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematical procedural learning. Developmental Psychology 1991, 27(5):777-786.
10. California Department of Education (2008). California Fact Book 2008 - Handbook of Education Information.
11. Department of Education (1997). Mathematics equals opportunity. White Paper prepared for US Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley.
12. Geary D.C., Hoard M.K., Nugent L., Byrd-Craven J. Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology 2008, 33:277-299.
13. Higgins L. Algebra 1 stumping high school freshmen: Class of 2011 confronts tougher state requirements 2008, Detroit Free Press, Gannett.
14. Hunting R.P., Davis G., Pearn C.A. Engaging whole-number knowledge for rational-number learning using a computer-based tool. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1996, 27:354-379.
15. Kanayet F., Opfer J.E. Why children's number line estimates follow Fechner's Law. Proceedings of the 31st annual cognitive science society 2009, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn (Eds.).
16. Kerslake D. Fractions: Children's strategies and errors 1986, NFER-Nelson, Windsor, England.
17. Ketterlin-Geller L.R., Chard D. Algebra readiness for students with learning difficulties in grades 4-8: Support through the study of number. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties 2011, 16(1):65-78.
18. Kim D., Schneider C., Engec N., Siskind T. South Carolina end-of-course examination program 2003-04 Algebra 1: Mathematics for the Technologies 2 state report 2006, South Carolina Department of Education.
19. Knuth E.J., Stephens A.C., McNeil N.M., Alibali M.W. Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2006, 37(4):297-312.
20. Mack N. Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research Mathematics Education 1995, 26:422-441.
21. McNeil N.M., Weinberg A., Hattikudur S., Stephens A.C., Asquith P., Knuth E.J., et al. A is for apple: Mnemonic symbols hinder the interpretation of algebraic expressions. Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 102(3):625-634.
22. Mix K., Levine S., Huttenlocher J. Early fraction calculation ability. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35:164-174.
23. National Mathematics Advisory Panel Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel 2008, US Department of Education, Washington, DC.
24. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) & Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
25. Ni Y., Zhou Y. Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 2005, 40(1):27-52.
26. Olive J. From fractions to rational numbers of arithmetic: A reorganization hypothesis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 1999, 1:279-314.
27. Pennsylvania Department of Education (2011). 2011 Keystone Exams State Summary Report - Algebra I.
28. Piaget J. The psychology of intelligence 1960, Harcourt, Brace, New York.
29. Saenz-Ludlow A. Michael's fraction schemes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1994, 25:50-85.
30. Siegler R.S., Duncan G.J., Davis-Kean P.E., Duckworth K., Claessens A., Engel M., et al. Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science 2012, 23:691-697.
31. Siegler R.S., Opfer J.E. The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science 2003, 14:237-243.
32. Siegler R.S., Thompson C.A., Opfer J.E. The logarithmic-to-linear shift: One learning sequence, many tasks, many time scales. Mind, Brain, and Education 2009, 3:143-150.
33. Siegler R.S., Thompson C.A., Schneider M. An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology 2011, 62:273-296.
34. Thompson C.A., Opfer J.E. Costs and benefits of representational change: Effect of context on age and sex differences in magnitude estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2008, 101:20-51.
35. Thompson C.A., Opfer J.E. How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development 2010, 81:1768-1786.
36. Thompson P.W., Saldanha L.A. Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. Research compendium for the principles and standards for school mathematics 2003, 95-113. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA. J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, D. Schiffer (Eds.).
37. Tzur R. An integrated study of children's construction of improper fractions and the teacher's role in promoting that learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1999, 30:390-416.
38. Tzur R. Teacher and students' joint production of a reversible fraction conception. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2004, 23:93-114.
39. Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. Coxford, & A. Shulte (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K-12. 1988 yearbook (pp. 8-19). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
40. Wu H. How to prepare students for algebra. American Educator 2001, 25(2):10-17.
41. Wu H. What's sophisticated about elementary mathematics?. American Educator 2009, 33(3):4-14.