An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 273-296

  Siegler, Robert S ^a   Thompson, Clarissa A ^a,b   Schneider, Michael ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Arithmetic; Fractions; Magnitude representations; Mathematics achievement; Strategy choice

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 79955719641     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Ansari D. Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2008, 9:278-291.
2. Berteletti I., Lucangeli D., Piazza M., Dehaene S., Zorzi M. Numerical estimation in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology 2010, 41:545-551.
3. Bonato M., Fabbri S., Umiltà C., Zorzi M. The mental representation of numerical fractions: Real or integer?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1410-1419.
4. Booth J.L., Siegler R.S. Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology 2006, 42(1):189-201.
5. Booth J.L., Siegler R.S. Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development 2008, 79(4):1016-1031.
6. Carpenter T.P., Corbitt M.K., Kepner H., Lindquist M.M., Reys R. Results from the second mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress 1981, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Washington, DC.
7. Case R., Okamoto Y. The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children's thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1996, 61(1-2).
8. Cramer K., Bezuk N. Multiplication of fractions: Teaching for understanding. Arithmetic Teacher 1991, 39:34-37.
9. Cramer K.A., Post T.R., del Mas R.C. Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2002, 33(2):111-144.
10. de Havia M.D., Spelke E.S. Number-space mapping in human infants. Psychological Science 2010, 21:653-660.
11. Dehaene S. The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics 1997, Oxford University Press, NY.
12. Dehaene S., Bossini S., Giraux P. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1993, 122:371-396.
13. Dehaene S., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Cohen L. Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends in Neuroscience 1998, 21:355-361.
14. Dehaene S., Mehler J. Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition 1992, 12:119-149.
15. Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 1980, 87:215-251.
16. Feigenson L., Dehaene S., Spelke E. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:307-314.
17. Fias W., Fischer M.H. Spatial representation of numbers. Handbook of mathematical cognition 2005, 43-54. Psychology Press, New York. J.I.D. Campbell (Ed.).
18. Fujimura N. Facilitating children's proportional reasoning: A model of reasoning processes and effects of intervention on strategy change. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 93:589-603.
19. Geary, D. C. (2006). Development of mathematical understanding. In W. Damon, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (Vol. 2, pp. 777-810). Hoboken, NH: Wiley.
20. Geary D.C., Hoard M.K., Byrd-Craven J., Nugent L., Numtee C. Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development 2007, 78(4):1343-1359.
21. Geary D.C., Hoard M.K., Nugent L., Byrd-Craven J. Development of number line representations in children with mathematical learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology 2008, 33:277-299.
22. Gelman R. Epigenetic foundations of knowledge structures: Initial and transcendent constructions. The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition 1991, 293-322. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Carey, R. Gelman (Eds.).
23. Gelman R., Williams E. Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning: Domain specificity and epigenesis. Handbook of child psychology 1998, Wiley, New York. W. Damon, D. Kuhn, R.S. Siegler (Eds.).
24. Gentner D., Markman A.B. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 1997, 52:45-56.
25. Gevers W., Ratinckx E., De Baene W., Fias W. Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental Psychology 2006, 53:58-68.
26. Gilmore C.K., McCarthy S.E., Spelke E. Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction. Nature 2007, 447:589-591.
27. Halberda J., Mazzocco M.M.M., Feigenson L. Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature 2008, 455(7213):665-669.
28. Hecht S.A. Toward an information-processing account of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 1998, 90:545-559.
29. Hecht S.A., Close L., Santisi M. Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2003, 86:277-302.
30. Hecht S.A., Vagi K.J. Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 102(4):843-858.
31. Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics 1986, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J. Hiebert (Ed.).
32. Hiebert J., Wearne D. Procedures over concepts: The acquisition of decimal number knowledge. Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics 1986, 199-223. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J. Hiebert (Ed.).
33. Holloway I., Ansari D. Domain-specific and domain-general changes in children's development of number comparison. Developmental Science 2008, 11:644-649.
34. Hubbard E.M., Piazza M., Pinel P., Dehaene S. Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:435-448.
35. Hummel J.E., Holyoak K.J. A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review 2003, 11:220-264.
36. Jordan K.E., Baker J. Multisensory information boosts numerical matching abilities in young children. Developmental Science 2007, 10:1-9.
37. Kalchman M., Moss J., Case R. Psychological models for the development of mathematical understanding: Rational numbers and functions. Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress 2001, 1-38. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M. Carver, D. Klahr (Eds.).
38. Keijzer R., Terwel J. Learning for mathematical insight: A longitudinal comparative study on modeling. Learning and Instruction 2003, 13:285-304.
39. Keil F.C., Batterman N. A characteristic-to-defining shift in the development of word meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1984, 23:221-236.
40. Kerslake D. Children's strategies and errors 1986, NFER-Nelson, London.
41. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B., (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (by the Mathematics Learning Study Committee/National Research Council).
42. Kloosterman P. Mathematics skills of 17-year-old students in the United States: 1978-2004. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2010, 41:20-51.
43. Laski E.V., Siegler R.S. Is 27 a big number? Correlational and causal connections among numerical categorization, number line estimation, and numerical magnitude comparison. Child Development 2007, 78(6):1723-1743.
44. Le Corre M., Van de Walle G., Brannon E.M., Carey S. Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52:130-169.
45. Leslie A.M., Gelman R., Gallistel C.R. The generative basis of natural number concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12(6):213-218.
46. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R. General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science 2010, 21(6):873-881.
47. Ma L. Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States 1999, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
48. Mack N.K. Learning rational numbers with understanding. The case of informal knowledge. Rational numbers: An integration of research 1993, 85-105. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. T.P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, T.A. Romberg (Eds.).
49. Mack N.K. Confounding whole-number and fraction concepts when building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1995, 26(422-441).
50. Mazzocco M.M.M., Devlin K.T. Parts and holes: Gaps in rational number sense in children with vs. without mathematical learning disability. Developmental Science 2008, 11(5):681-691.
51. Mix K.S., Levine S.C., Huttenlocher J. Early fraction calculation ability. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35:164-174.
52. Moseley B.J., Okamoto Y., Ishida J. Comparing U.S. and Japanese elementary school teachers' facility for linking rational number representations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2007, 5:165-185.
53. Moss J., Case R. Developing children's understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1999, 30:127-147.
54. Moyer R.S., Landauer T.K. Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature 1967, 215(1519-1520).
55. Mundy, E., Gilmore, C. K. (2009). Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103, 490-5-2.
56. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. <>http://www.nctm.org/focalpoints/down-loads.asp.
57. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2007). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
58. Ni Y., Zhou Y.-D. Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 2005, 40:27-52.
59. NMAP Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel 2008, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
60. Nunes, T., Bryant, P. (2008). Key understanding in mathematics learning. Paper 3: Understanding rational numbers and intensive quantities. <>http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org.
61. Opfer J.E., DeVries J.M. Representational change and magnitude estimation: Why young children can make more accurate salary comparisons than adults. Cognition 2008, 108:843-849.
62. Opfer J.E., Siegler R.S. Representational change and children's numerical estimation. Cognitive Psychology 2007, 55:169-195.
63. Opfer J.E., Thompson C.A. The trouble with transfer: Insights from microgenetic changes in the representation of numerical magnitude. Child Development 2008, 79(3):788-804.
64. Opfer J.E., Thompson C.A., Furlong E.E. Early development of spatial-numeric associations: Evidence from spatial and quantitative performance of preschoolers. Developmental Science 2010, 13(5):761-771.
65. Ramani G.B., Siegler R.S. Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development 2008, 79(2):375-394.
66. Resnick L.B., Omanson S.F. Learning to understand arithmetic. Advances in instructional psychology 1987, 41-95. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R. Glaser (Ed.).
67. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory and children's acquisition of scientific and mathematical concepts. Learning and Individual Differences 1991, 3:27-60.
68. Rittle-Johnson, B., Koedinger, K. (2002). Comparing instructional strategies for integrating conceptual and procedural knowledge. In D.S. Mewborn, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentyfourth annual meeting of the north American chapters of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 969-978). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
69. Rittle-Johnson B., Koedinger K. Iterating between lessons on concepts and procedures can improve mathematics knowledge. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 79:483-500.
70. Rittle-Johnson B., Siegler R.S., Alibali M.W. Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 93:346-362.
71. Schaeffer B., Eggleston V.H., Scott J.L. Number development in young children. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:357-379.
72. Schneider M., Heine A., Thaler V., Torbeyns J., De Smedt B., Verschaffel L., et al. A validation of eye movements as a measure of elementary school children's developing number sense. Cognitive Development 2008, 23(3):409-422.
73. Schneider M., Siegler R.S. Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:1227-1238.
74. Schneider M., Stern E. The developmental relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge: A multimethod approach. Developmental Psychology 2010, 46(1):178-192.
75. Shrager J., Siegler R.S. SCADS: A model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science 1998, 9:405-410.
76. Siegler R.S. Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking 1996, Oxford University Press, New York.
77. Siegler R.S., Booth J.L. Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development 2004, 75(2):428-444.
78. Siegler R.S., Opfer J. The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science 2003, 14:237-243.
79. Siegler R.S., Ramani G.B. Playing linear number board games - But not circular ones - Improves low-income preschoolers' numerical understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101(3):545-560.
80. Siegler R.S., Shipley C. Variation, selection, and cognitive change. Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling 1995, 31-76. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. T. Simon, G. Halford (Eds.).
81. Siegler R.S., Thompson C.A., Opfer J.E. The logarithmic-to-linear shift: One learning sequence, many tasks, many time scales. Mind, Brain, and Education 2009, 2:143-150.
82. Sophian C. The origins of mathematical knowledge in childhood (studies in mathematical thinking and learning) 2007, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
83. Sowder J., Armstrong B., Lamon S., Simon M., Sowder L., Thompson A. Educating teachers to teach multiplicative structures in the middle grades. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 1998, 1:127-155.
84. Stafylidou S., Vosniadou S. The development of students' understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction 2004, 14(503-518).
85. Thompson, P. W., Saldanha, L. (2003). Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, and D. Schifter, (Eds.), Research companion to the principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 95-114). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
86. Thompson C.A., Opfer J. How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development 2010, 81:1768-1786.
87. Thompson C.A., Siegler R.S. Linear numerical magnitude representations aid children's memory for numbers. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1274-1281.
88. Vamakoussi X., Vosniadou S. How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students' understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction 2010, 28:181-209.
89. Vosniadou S., Vamvakoussi X., Skopeliti I. The framework theory approach to conceptual change. International handbook of research on conceptual change 2008, 3-34. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. S. Vosniadou (Ed.).
90. Whyte J.C., Bull R. Number games, magnitude representation, and basic number skills in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology 2008, 44(2):588-596.
91. Wynn K. Infants possess a system of numerical knowledge. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1995, 4:172-177.
92. Wynn K. Do infants have numerical expectations or just perceptual preferences?. Developmental Science 2002, 2:207-209.
93. Yoshida H., Sawano K. Overcoming cognitive obstacles in learning fractions: Equal-partitioning and equal-whole. Japanese Psychological Research 2002, 44:183-195.
94. Zorzi M., Priftis K., Umiltà C. Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 2002, 417:138.