Genetic analysis of metabolome-phenotype interactions: From model to crop species

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 41-50

  Carreno Quintero, Natalia ^a,b   Bouwmeester, Harro J ^a,b   Keurentjes, Joost J B ^a,b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CENTRE FOR BIOSYSTEMS GENOMICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Crop species; Genetics; Integrative biology; Metabolomics; Phenotypes; Plant models

Indexed keywords

CROP; DNA POLYMORPHISM; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCATION; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HEREDITY; INTROGRESSION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHOSPHORYLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTOMICS;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; METABOLOME; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PLANTS;

EID: 84871699802     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.09.006     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Dixon R.A., Strack D. Phytochemistry meets genome analysis, and beyond. Phytochemistry 2003, 62:815-816.
2. Fernie A.R., Schauer N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:39-48.
3. Kooke R., Keurentjes J.J.B. Multi-dimensional regulation of metabolic networks shaping plant development and performance. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:3353-3365.
4. Keurentjes J.J.B. Genetical metabolomics: closing in on phenotypes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:223-230.
5. Draper J., et al. Metabolite analysis and metabolomics in the study of biotrophic interactions between plants and microbes. Annu. Plant Rev. 2011, 43:25-59.
6. Allwood J.W., et al. Metabolomic technologies and their application to the study of plants and plant-host interactions. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 132:117-135.
7. Fiehn O., et al. Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18:1157-1161.
8. Carreno-Quintero N., et al. Untargeted metabolic quantitative trait loci analyses reveal a relationship between primary metabolism and potato tuber quality. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:1306-1318.
9. Fu J., et al. System-wide molecular evidence for phenotypic buffering in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:166-167.
10. Keurentjes J.J.B., et al. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:842-849.
11. Kliebenstein D.J., et al. Genetic control of natural variation in Arabidopsis glucosinolate accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126:811-825.
12. Lisec J., et al. Identification of metabolic and biomass QTL in Arabidopsis thaliana in a parallel analysis of RIL and IL populations. Plant J. 2008, 53:960-972.
13. Rowe H.C., et al. Biochemical networks and epistasis shape the Arabidopsis thaliana metabolome. Plant Cell 2008, 20:1199-1216.
14. Schauer N., et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24:447-454.
15. Langridge P., Fleury D. Making the most of 'omics' for crop breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2011, 29:33-40.
16. Kliebenstein D.J. Advancing genetic theory and application by metabolic quantitative trait loci analysis. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1637-1646.
17. Byrne P.F., et al. Quantitative trait loci and metabolic pathways: genetic control of the concentration of maysin, a corn earworm resistance factor, in maize silks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93:8820-8825.
18. Feng J., et al. Characterization of metabolite quantitative trait loci and metabolic networks that control glucosinolate concentration in the seeds and leaves of Brassica napus. New Phytol. 2012, 193:96-108.
19. Lou P., et al. Quantitative trait loci for glucosinolate accumulation in Brassica rapa leaves. New Phytol. 2008, 179:1017-1032.
20. McMullen M.D., et al. Quantitative trait loci and metabolic pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:1996-2000.
21. Fridman E., et al. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484bp within an invertase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97:4718-4723.
22. Fridman E., et al. Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science 2004, 305:1786-1789.
23. Osorio S., et al. Application of metabolomic profiling for identifying valuable traits in tomato. CAB Rev. 2009, 4:1-9.
24. Tikunov Y., et al. A novel approach for nontargeted data analysis for metabolomics. Large-scale profiling of tomato fruit volatiles. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139:1125-1137.
25. Dobson G., et al. Phytochemical diversity in tubers of potato cultivars and landraces using a GC-MS metabolomics approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56:10280-10291.
26. Dobson G., et al. A metabolomics study of cultivated potato (Solanum tuberosum) groups andigena, phureja, stenotomum, and tuberosum using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 58:1214-1223.
27. Catchpole G.S., et al. Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:14458-14462.
28. Roessner U., et al. Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems. Plant Cell 2001, 13:11-29.
29. Weckwerth W., et al. Differential metabolic networks unravel the effects of silent plant phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:7809-7814.
30. Schauer N., et al. Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. Plant Cell 2008, 20:509-523.
31. Wentzell A.M., et al. Linking metabolic QTLs with network and cis-eQTLs controlling biosynthetic pathways. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:1687-1701.
32. de Koning D.J., Haley C.S. Genetical genomics in humans and model organisms. Trends Genet. 2005, 21:377-381.
33. Chan E.K.F., et al. The complex genetic architecture of the metabolome. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001198.
34. Kump K.L., et al. Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:163-168.
35. Poland J.A., et al. Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:6893-6898.
36. Tian F., et al. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:159-162.
37. Riedelsheimer C., et al. Genome-wide association mapping of leaf metabolic profiles for dissecting complex traits in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:8872-8877.
38. Zhang N., et al. Fine quantitative trait loci mapping of carbon and nitrogen metabolism enzyme activities and seedling biomass in the maize IBM mapping population. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:1753-1765.
39. Bino R.J., et al. Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9:418-425.
40. Hirai M.Y., et al. Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics for understanding of global responses to nutritional stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:10205-10210.
41. Bylesjo M., et al. Data integration in plant biology: the O2PLS method for combined modeling of transcript and metabolite data. Plant J. 2007, 52:1181-1191.
42. Le Cao K.A., et al. Sparse canonical methods for biological data integration: application to a cross-platform study. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10:34.
43. Keurentjes J.J.B., et al. Integrative analyses of genetic variation in enzyme activities of primary carbohydrate metabolism reveal distinct modes of regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol. 2008, 9:R129.
44. Maruyama K., et al. Metabolic pathways involved in cold acclimation identified by integrated analysis of metabolites and transcripts regulated by DREB1A and DREB2A. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150:1972-1980.
45. Urano K., et al. Characterization of the ABA-regulated global responses to dehydration in Arabidopsis by metabolomics. Plant J. 2009, 57:1065-1078.
46. Hannah M.A., et al. Combined transcript and metabolite profiling of Arabidopsis grown under widely variant growth conditions facilitates the identification of novel metabolite-mediated regulation of gene expression. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:2120-2129.
47. Petersson S.V., et al. An auxin gradient and maximum in the Arabidopsis root apex shown by high-resolution cell-specific analysis of IAA distribution and synthesis. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1659-1668.
48. Hirai M.Y., et al. Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:25590-25595.
49. Scheible W.R., et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136:2483-2499.
50. 2 conditions and salinity stress on Arabidopsis thaliana liquid cultures: comparing the early molecular response using time-series transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:177.
51. Caldana C., et al. High-density kinetic analysis of the metabolomic and transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis to eight environmental conditions. Plant J. 2011, 67:869-884.
52. Tohge T., et al. Functional genomics by integrated analysis of metabolome and transcriptome of Arabidopsis plants over-expressing an MYB transcription factor. Plant J. 2005, 42:218-235.
53. Hirai M.Y., et al. Omics-based identification of Arabidopsis Myb transcription factors regulating aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:6478-6483.
54. Liberman L.M., et al. Integrative systems biology: an attempt to describe a simple weed. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:162-167.
55. Mounet F., et al. Gene and metabolite regulatory network analysis of early developing fruit tissues highlights new candidate genes for the control of tomato fruit composition and development. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149:1505-1528.
56. Osorio S., et al. Systems biology of tomato fruit development: combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor (nor, rin) and ethylene receptor (Nr) mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157:405-425.
57. Zamboni A., et al. Identification of putative stage-specific grapevine berry biomarkers and omics data integration into networks. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:1439-1459.
58. Tieman D.M., et al. Identification of loci affecting flavour volatile emissions in tomato fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57:887-896.
59. Stewart D., et al. Crops and tasty, nutritious food - how can metabolomics help?. Annu. Plant Rev. 2011, 43:181-217.
60. Plant Metabolomics Methods and Protocols 2011, Humana Press. N.W. Hardy, R.D. Hall (Eds.).
61. Hall R.D. Plant metabolomics in a nutshell: potential and future challenges. Annu. Plant Rev. 2011, 43:1-24.
62. Fernie A.R., Stitt M. On the discordance of metabolomics with proteomics and transcriptomics: coping with increasing complexity in logic, chemistry, and network interactions scientific correspondence. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:1139-1145.
63. Saito K., Matsuda F. Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61:463-489.
64. Fiehn O., et al. Minimum reporting standards for plant biology context information in metabolomic studies. Metabolomics 2007, 3:195-201.
65. Widodo, et al. Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and Clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:4089-4103.
66. Röhlig R., et al. Metabolite profiling of maize grain: differentiation due to genetics and environment. Metabolomics 2009, 5:459-477.
67. Sato S., et al. Time-resolved metabolomics reveals metabolic modulation in rice foliage. BMC Syst. Biol. 2008, 2:51.
68. Kusano M., et al. Application of a metabolomic method combining one-dimensional and two-dimensional gas chromatography-time-of-flight/mass spectrometry to metabolic phenotyping of natural variants in rice. J. Chromatogr. B: Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007, 855:71-79.
69. Zhou J., et al. Metabolic profiling of transgenic rice with cryIAc and sck genes: an evaluation of unintended effects at metabolic level by using GC-FID and GC-MS. J. Chromatogr. B: Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2009, 877:725-732.
70. Graham S., et al. Application of NMR based metabolomics for mapping metabolite variation in European wheat. Metabolomics 2009, 5:302-306.
71. Achnine L., et al. Genomics-based selection and functional characterization of triterpene glycosyltransferases from the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant J. 2005, 41:875-887.
72. Farag M.A., et al. Integrated metabolite and transcript profiling identify a biosynthetic mechanism for hispidol in Medicago truncatula cell cultures. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151:1096-1113.
73. Na Jom K., et al. A metabolite profiling approach to follow the sprouting process of mung beans (Vigna radiata). Metabolomics 2011, 7:102-117.
74. Charlton A., et al. NMR profiling of transgenic peas. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2004, 2:27-35.
75. Rischer H., et al. Gene-to-metabolite networks for terpenoid indole alkaloid biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:5614-5619.
76. Yamazaki M., et al. Differential gene expression profiles of red and green forms of Perilla frutescens leading to comprehensive identification of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes. FEBS J. 2008, 275:3494-3502.
77. Pino Del Carpio D., et al. The patterns of population differentiation in a Brassica rapa core collection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 122:1105-1118.
78. Roessner U., et al. Simultaneous analysis of metabolites in potato tuber by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Plant J. 2000, 23:131-142.
79. Schauer N., et al. Metabolic profiling of leaves and fruit of wild species tomato: a survey of the Solanum lycopersicum complex. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56:297-307.
80. Mintz-Oron S., et al. Gene expression and metabolism in tomato fruit surface tissues. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:823-851.
81. Moco S., et al. A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolome database for tomato. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141:1205-1218.
82. Moco S.I.A., et al. Intra- and inter-metabolite correlation spectroscopy of tomato metabolomics data obtained by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance. Metabolomics 2008, 4:202-215.
83. Fraser P.D., et al. Metabolite profiling of plant carotenoids using the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Plant J. 2007, 49:552-564.
84. 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool to detect potential unintended effects following a genetic modification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51:2447-2456.
85. Goossens A., et al. A functional genomics approach toward the understanding of secondary metabolism in plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:8595-8600.
86. Wahyuni Y., et al. Metabolite biodiversity in pepper (Capsicum) fruits of thirty-two diverse accessions: variation in health-related compounds and implications for breeding. Phytochemistry 2011, 72:1358-1370.
87. 1H NMR and chemometrics to characterize mature grape berries in four wine-growing areas in Bordeaux, France. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53:6382-6389.
88. Stewart D., et al. Metabolomic approach to identifying bioactive compounds in berries: advances toward fruit nutritional enhancement. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51:645-651.
89. Aharoni A., et al. Nontargeted metabolome analysis by use of Fourier transform ion cyclotron mass spectrometry. OMICS 2002, 6:217-234.
90. Hanhineva K., et al. Non-targeted analysis of spatial metabolite composition in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) flowers. Phytochemistry 2008, 69:2463-2481.
91. Biais B., et al. Metabolic acclimation to hypoxia revealed by metabolite gradients in melon fruit. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167:242-245.