Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions

Science

Volumn 305, Issue 5691, 2004, Pages 1786-1789

  Fridman, Eyal ^a,c   Carrari, Fernando ^b   Liu, Yong Sheng ^a,d   Fernie, Alisdair R ^b   Zamir, Dani ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR PLANT PHYSIOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CATALYSIS; CULTIVATION; ENZYME KINETICS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

CATALYTIC SITES; INTROGRESSION LINES (IL); POLYMORPHISM;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; SUGAR; ASPARTIC ACID; BETA FRUCTOFURANOSIDASE; SUCROSE;

BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; ENZYME KINETICS; FLOWER; FRUIT; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; TOMATO; WILD SPECIES; ALLELE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; CROSS BREEDING; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOLANUM;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII; SOLANUM;

ALLELES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ASPARTIC ACID; BETA-FRUCTOFURANOSIDASE; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; CROSSES, GENETIC; FLOWERS; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION TEST; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; SOLANUM; SUCROSE; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TRANSFORMATION, GENETIC;

EID: 4544345787     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1101666     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. T. F. Mackay, Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 303 (2001).
2. D. Zamir, Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 983 (2001).
3. Y. Eshed, D. Zamir, Genetics 141, 1147 (1995).
4. J. B. Singer et al., Science 304, 445 (2004).
5. I. Paran, D. Zamir, Trends Genet. 19, 303 (2003).
6. M. Koornneef, C. Alonso-Blanco, D. Vreugdenhil, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 141 (2004).
7. S. El-Din El-Assal, C. Alonso-Blanco, A. J. Peeters, V. Raz, M. Koornneef, Nature Genet. 29, 435 (2001).
8. J. N. Maloof et al., Nature Genet. 29, 441 (2001).
9. A. Gur, D. Zamir, PLoS Biol. 2, e245 (2004).
10. S. Knapp, L. Bohs, M. Nee, D. M. Spooner, Comp. Funct. Genomics 5, 285 (2004).
11. Y. S. Liu et al., Plant Biotech. J. 1, 195 (2003).
12. A. Gur, Y. Semel, A. Cahaner, D. Zamir, Trends Plant Sci. 9, 107 (2004).
13. E. Fridman et al., Mol. Genet. Genomics 266, 821 (2002).
14. E. Fridman, T. Pleban, D. Zamir, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 4718 (2000).
15. E. Fridman, D. Zamir, Plant Physiol. 131, 603 (2003).
16. K. Koch, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 235 (2004).
17. G. Q. Tang, M. Luscher, A. Sturm, Plant Cell 11, 177 (1999).
18. L. F. Stam, C. C. Laurie, Genetics 144, 1559 (1996).
19. S. D. Tanksley et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 213 (1996).
20. D. Bernacchi et al., Theor. Appl. Genet, 97, 170 (1998).
21. T. M. Futton et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 1025 (2000).
22. A. Frary, T. M. Fulton, D. Zamir, S. D. Tanksley, Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 485 (2004).
23. D. Gozalbo, S. Hohmann, Curr. Genet. 17, 77 (1990).
24. F. Alberto, C. Bignon, G. Sulzenbacher, B. Henrissat, M. Czjzek, J. Biol. Chem. 279, 18903 (2004).
25. T. F. Mackay, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14, 253 (2004).
26. H. Ge, A. J. Walhout, M. Vidal, Trends Genet. 19, 551 (2003).
27. N. Freimer, C. Sabatti, Nature Genet. 34, 15 (2003).
28. Single-Letter abbreviations for the amino acid residues are as follows: A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
29. We thank L. Willmitzer for support and discussions, T. Pleban for the technical. assistance, A. Sturm for the invertase antibody, A. G. Heyer for advice on yeast transformations, and D. Spooner for updating the new tomato taxonomy. We are grateful to Y. Eshed, E. Pichersky, and S. Wolf for the helpful discussions. This research was supported by a grant from the German-Israeli Cooperation Project (DIP).