Making the most of 'omics' for crop breeding

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 33-40

  Langridge, Peter ^a   Fleury, Delphine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATIONS; BREEDING TECHNOLOGY; CROP PRODUCTIVITY; DATA SETS; GENETIC GAIN; GENOTYPING; GERMPLASM COLLECTIONS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT;

GENES;

CROPS;

AGRONOMIC TRAIT; ALLELE; CROP PRODUCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC GAIN; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; GERMPLASM; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW;

BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; CROSSES, GENETIC; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 78650417880     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.09.006     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Huang X., et al. High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 2009, 19:1068-1076.
2. Xie W., et al. Parent-independent genotyping for constructing an ultrahigh-density linkage map based on population sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:10578-10583.
3. Burbano H.A., et al. Targeted investigation of the Neandertal genome by array-based sequence capture. Science 2010, 328:723-725.
4. Fleury D., et al. Genetic and genomic tools to improve drought tolerance in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:3211-3222.
5. Potokina E., et al. eQTL analysis of 16,000 barley genes reveals a complex pattern of genome wide transcriptional regulation. Plant J. 2008, 53:90-101.
6. Jordan M.C., et al. Identifying regions of the wheat genome controlling seed development by mapping expression quantitative trait loci. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2007, 5:442-453.
7. Druka A., et al. Towards systems genetic analyses in barley: Integration of phenotypic, expression and genotype data into GeneNetwork. BMC Genet. 2008, 9:73.
8. Fernie A.R., Schauer N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?. Trends Genet. 2009, 25:39-48.
9. Saito K., Matsuda F. Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61:463-489.
10. Marino R., et al. Addressing drought tolerance in maize by transcriptional profiling and mapping. Mol. Gene. Genomics 2009, 281:163-217.
11. Reynolds M., et al. Phenotyping approaches for physiological breeding and gene discovery in wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2009, 155:309-320.
12. Hammer G., et al. Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:587-593.
13. Chapman S.C. Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials. Euphytica 2008, 161:195-208.
14. Song X.J., et al. A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:623-630.
15. Sutton T., et al. Boron-toxicity tolerance in barley arising from efflux transporter amplification. Science 2007, 318:1446-1449.
16. Barkley N.A., Wang M.L. Application of TILLING and EcoTILLING as Reverse Genetic Approaches to Elucidate the Function of Genes in Plants and Animals. Curr. Genomics 2008, 9:212-226.
17. Wang N., et al. Assessment of FAE1 polymorphisms in three Brassica species using EcoTILLING and their association with differences in seed erucic acid contents. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:137.
18. Feuillet C., et al. Cereal breeding takes a walk on the wild side. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:24-32.
19. Townsend J.A., et al. High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 2009, 459:442-445.
20. Shukla V.K., et al. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 2009, 459:437-441.
21. Kuchel H., et al. Genetic dissection of grain yield in bread wheat. II. QTL-by-environment interaction. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115:1015-1027.
22. Heffner E.L., et al. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 2009, 49:1-12.
23. Mayor P.J., Bernardo R. Genomewide selection and marker-assisted recurrent selection in doubled haploid versus F-2 populations. Crop Sci. 2009, 49:1719-1725.
24. Duvick D.N. The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). Adv. Agron. 2005, 86:83-145.
25. Bernardo R. Genomewide selection with minimal crossing in self-pollinated crops. Crop Sci. 2010, 50:624-627.
26. Kuchel H., et al. The successful application of a marker-assisted wheat breeding strategy. Mol. Breed. 2007, 20:295-308.
27. Randhawa H.S., et al. Rapid and targeted introgression of genes into popular wheat cultivars using marker-assisted background selection. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5752.
28. Bernardo R. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 2008, 48:1649-1664.
29. Ribaut J.M., Ragot M. Marker-assisted selection to improve drought adaptation in maize: the backcross approach, perspectives, limitations, and alternatives. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:351-360.
30. Robbins M.D., Staub J.E. Comparative analysis of marker-assisted and phenotypic selection for yield components in cucumber. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119:621-634.
31. Eathington S.R., et al. Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Sci. 2007, 47:S154-S163.
32. Belo A., et al. Whole genome scan detects an allelic variant of fad2 associated with increased oleic acid levels in maize. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2008, 279:1-10.
33. Kover P.X., et al. A multiparent advanced generation inter-cross to fine-map quantitative traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000551.
34. Yu J., et al. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 2008, 178:539-551.
35. McMullen M.D., et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 2009, 325:737-740.
36. Buckler E.S., et al. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 2009, 325:714-718.
37. Druka A., et al. Exploiting induced variation to dissect quantitative traits in barley. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010, 38:683-688.
38. Appleby N., et al. New technologies for ultra-high throughput genotyping in plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 513:19-39.
39. Close T.J., et al. Development and implementation of high-throughput SNP genotyping in barley. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:582.
40. Varshney R.K., et al. Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27:522-530.
41. Hyten D.L., et al. High-throughput SNP discovery through deep resequencing of a reduced representation library to anchor and orient scaffolds in the soybean whole genome sequence. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:38.
42. Akhunov E., et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in polyploid wheat with the Illumina GoldenGate assay. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119:507-517.
43. Varshney R.K., et al. Orphan legume crops enter the genomics era!. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:202-210.
44. Dillon S.L., et al. Domestication to crop improvement: genetic resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneae). Ann. Bot. 2007, 100:975-989.
45. Schnable P.S., et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 2009, 326:1112-1115.
46. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436, 793-800.
47. Catusse J., et al. Proteome-wide characterization of sugarbeet seed vigor and its tissue specific expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:10262-10267.
48. Schmutz J., et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463:178-183.
49. Schulte D., et al. The International Barley Sequencing Consortium - at the threshold of efficient access to the barley genome. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149:142-147.
50. Van Deynze A., et al. Sampling nucleotide diversity in cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9:125.
51. Srisuwan S., et al. The origin and evolution of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Lam.) and its wild relatives through the cytogenetic approaches. Plant Science 2006, 171:424-433.
52. Joobeur T., et al. Construction of a watermelon BAC library and identification of SSRs anchored to melon or Arabidopsis genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 112:1553-1562.
53. Hippolyte I., et al. A saturated SSR/DArT linkage map of Musa acuminata addressing genome rearrangements among bananas. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:65.
54. Jakse J., et al. Pilot sequencing of onion genomic DNA reveals fragments of transposable elements, low gene densities, and significant gene enrichment after methyl filtration. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2008, 280:287-292.
55. Kim H., et al. Sequenced BAC anchored reference genetic map that reconciles the ten individual chromosomes of Brassica rapa. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:432.
56. Paterson A.H., et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457:551-556.
57. Han Y., Korban S.S. An overview of the apple genome through BAC end sequence analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67:581-588.
58. Jaillon O., et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007, 449:463-467.