Learning to learn and work in net-based teams: Supporting emergent collaboration with visualization tools

Designs for Learning Environments of the Future: International Perspectives from the Learning Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 143-188

  Reimann, Peter ^a   Kay, Judy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Capstone projects; Collaborative writing; Computer generated visualizations; Process mining; Team training; Teamwork; Text mining

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870765308     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-88279-6_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Albanese, R. & Fleet, D Dv. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 244-255.
2. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Behrdal, J. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, co-ordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Barros, B. & Verdejo, F. (2000). Analysing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 221-241.
4. Beck, K. (1999). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. New York: Addison-Wesley.
5. Blickensderfer, E. L., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997). Theoretical bases for team self-corrections: Fostering shared mental models. In D. J. M. M. Beyerlein & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 4, pp. 249-279). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6. Bodker, S. & Christiansen, E. (2006). Computer support for social awareness in flexible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 1-28.
7. Bonk, C. J. & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and socio-cultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Bratitsis, T., Dimitracopoulou, A., Martinez-Mones, A., Marcos, J. A., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2008). Supporting members of a learning community using Interaction Analysis tools: The example of the Kaleidoscope NoE scientific network. In P. Diaz, Kinshuk, I. Aedo & E. Mora (Eds.), The 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2008) (pp. 809-813). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
9. Buller, P. F. & Bell, C. H. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 305-328.
10. Cai, C. Y. (2007). Extracting students' knowledge structures form their written texts through Automap approach. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
11. Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (eds). (1998). Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining competencies and establishing team training requirements. In E. S. R. A. Guzzo (Ed.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organisations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Carley, K. M. (1986). An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12(2), 137-189.
14. Carley, K. M. (1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 533-558.
15. Carley, K. M., Diesner, J., & de Reno, M. (2006). AutoMap user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University. School of Computer Science. Institute for Software Research. Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS).
16. Chi, M. T. H. & Ohlsson, S. (2005). Complex declarative learning. In K. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 371-399). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington: American Psychological Association.
18. Conati, C., Gertner, A., & vanLehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modelling. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(4), 1573-1391.
19. Cross, G. A. (2001). Forming the collective mind: A conceptual exploration of large-scale collaborative writing in industry. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
20. Dönmez,P., Rose, C., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005, May 30-June 04). Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. Paper presented at the 2005 Conference on Computer Support For Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: the Next 10 Years! Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Taipei, Taiwan.
21. Dyer, J. C. (1984). Team research and team training: State-of-the-art review. In F. A. Muckler (Ed.), Human factors review (pp. 285-323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
22. West Virginia Department of Education (2007). 21st Century learning skills and technology tools: Content standards and objectives for WV Schools. Available from http://wvde.state.wv.us/poli-cies/p2520.14-ne.pdf
23. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
24. Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., Prangsma, M., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 463-486. (Pubitemid 40034573)
25. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 43-76. (Pubitemid 38202850)
26. Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2-3), 285-307.
27. Fussell, S. R., Kraut, R. E., Lerch, F. J., Scherlis, W. L., McNally, M. M., & Cadiz, J. J. (1998). Coordination, overload and team performance: Effects of team communication strategies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, WA
28. Gillies, R. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 197-213. (Pubitemid 38354781)
29. Gillies, R. & Ashman, A. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction, 6, 187-200. (Pubitemid 126170656)
30. Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of the writing process. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Hickey, D. T., Suiker, S. T., Taasoobshirazi, G., Schafer, N. J., & Michael, M. A. (2006). Balancing varied assessment functions to attain systemic validity: Three is the magic number. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 180-201. (Pubitemid 44734627)
32. iN2015 Education and Learning Sub-Committee. (2007). Empowering learners and engaging minds, through infocomm. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
33. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Stanne, M. B., & Garibaldi, A. (1989). Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 507-516.
34. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Kapur, M. (2006). Productive failure: A hidden efficacy of seemingly unproductive production. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
36. Kapur, M., Hung, D., Jacobson, M. J., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C. K., & Victor, C. D.-T. (2007). Emergence of learning in computer-supported, large-scale collective dynamics: A research agenda. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2007), New Brunswick, NJ.
37. Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K., & Reimann, P. (2006). The big five and visualisations of team work activity. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley & T. Chan (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, ITS 2006 (pp. 197-206). Jhongli, Taiwan: Springer. (Pubitemid 44117592)
38. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiental, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. (Pubitemid 43837408)
39. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychological Review, 18, 159-185. (Pubitemid 44825055)
40. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem- based learning meets case-based reasoning in the midlle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547. (Pubitemid 37244610)
41. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Brown, K. G., Weissbein, D. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2000). A multi-level perspective on training effectiveness: Enhancing horizontal and vertical transfer. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & K. J. Klein (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 157-210). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42. Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.
43. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353.
44. Layman, L., Williams, L., Damian, D., & Bures, H. (2006). Essential communication practices for extreme programming in a global software development team. Information and Software Technology, 48, 781-794. (Pubitemid 44094046)
45. Lee, E. Y. C., Han, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 57-88.
46. Leuf, B. & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47. Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66-99. (Pubitemid 38210883)
48. Lowry, P. B., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M. R. (2005). The impact of process structure on novice, virtual collaborative writing teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(4), 341-364. (Pubitemid 43000682)
49. MacMillan, J., Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (2004). Communication overhead: the hidden cost of team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition (pp. 61-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
50. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP). A Theory of Groups. Small Group Research., 22(2), 147-174.
51. McGrath, J. E. & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52. Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L., & Almond, R. G. (1999). Evidence-centered assessment design. Available from http://www.education.umd. edu/EDMS/mislevy/papers/ECD-overview.html
53. Olson, G. M., Malone, T. W., & Smith, J. B. (eds). (2001). Coordination theory and collaboration technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Paavola, S. & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor - An emergent episte- mological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14, 535-557. (Pubitemid 41650503)
55. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557-576.
56. Perera, D., Kay, J., Yacef, K., & Koprinska, I. (2007). Mining learners' traces from an online collaboration tool. Paper presented at the Educational Data Mining Workshop at Artificial Intelligence and Education, Marina del Ray, CA.
57. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.
58. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
59. Prichard, J. S. & Ashleigh, M. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and performance. Small Group Research, 58, 696-726.
60. Prichard, J. S., Startford, R. J., & Bizo, L. A. (2006). Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning. Learning and instruction, 16(3), 256-265. (Pubitemid 43717596)
61. Prichard, J. S., Stratford, R. J., & Hardy, C. (2004). Training students to work in teams: Why and how? York, UK: LTSN Psychology.
62. Reimann, P. (2003). How to support groups in learning: More than problem solving. In V. Aleven et al. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2003). Supplementary Proceedings (pp. 3-16). Sydney: University of Sydney.
63. Reimann, P. (2007). Time is precious: Why process analysis is essential for CSCL. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Minds, minds, and society. Proceedings of the CSCL 2007 conference (Vol. 8, pp. 598-607). New Brunswick, NJ: ISLS.
64. Reimann, P., Frerejean, J., & Thompson, K. (2009). Using process mining to identify models of group decision making processes in chat data. In C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning practices: CSCL2009 conference proceedings (pp. 98-107). International Society for the Learning Sciences.
65. Reinhold, S. (2006). WikiTrails: augmenting Wiki structure for collaborative, interdisciplinary learning. Paper presented at the 2006 international symposium on Wikis, Odense, Denmark
66. Reisig, W. (1985). Petri nets. An introduction. Berlin: Springer.
67. Resta, P. & Laferriere, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65-83.
68. Ripochet, G. & Sansonnet, J.-P. (2006). Experiences in automating the analysis of linguistic interactions for the study of distributed collectives. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 149-183. (Pubitemid 44157788)
69. Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30, 309-329.
70. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "Big Five" in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36(5), 555-599.
71. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences., 1(1), 37-68.
72. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
73. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). New York: Cambride University Press.
74. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
75. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. (Pubitemid 128056715)
76. Shaffer, D. W. (2008). Education in the digital age. Digital Kompetanse, 3(1), 37-50.
77. Shaffer, D. W., Hatfield, D., Svarovsky, G. N., Nash, P., Nutly, A., Bagley, E., et al. (2009). Epistemic Network Analysis: A prototype of 21st-Cenntury assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1, 33-53.
78. Shermis, M. D. & Burstein, J. C. (eds). (2003). Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
79. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
80. Soller, A., Martinez-Mones, A., Jermann, P., & Muehlenbrock, M. (2005). From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning (preprint). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15 (4), 261-290.
81. Souzis, A. (2005). Building a semantic wiki. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20, 87-91. (Pubitemid 41527279)
82. Stahl, G. (2006). Sustaining group cognition in a math chat environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(2), 85-113.
83. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. (Pubitemid 128376780)
84. Ullman, A. & Kay, J. (2007). WikiNavMap: A visualisation to supplement team based wikis Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2711-2716). San Jose, CA: ACM Press.
85. van Amalesvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported colloborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 485-521.
86. Van der Aalst, W. M. P. & Weijters, A. J. M. M. (2005). Process mining. In M. Dumas, W. M. P. van der Aalst & A. H. M. ter Hofstede (Eds.), Process-aware information systems: Bridging people and software through process technology (pp. 235-255). New York: Wiley.
87. vanLehn, K. (2007). Intelligent tutoring systems for continous, embedded assessment. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: shaping teaching and learning. Mahaw, NL: Erlbaum.
88. Villalon, J., Kearney, P., Calvo, R. A., & Reimann, P. (2008, July 1-5). Glosser: Enhanced feedback for student writing tasks. Paper presented at the 8th IEEE International Conference on Advance Learning Technologies (ICALT), Santadar, Spain.
89. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
90. Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-205). New York: Springer.
91. Weijters, A. J. M. M., Van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Medeiros, A. K. A. d. (2006). Process mining with the heuristics miner-algorithm. BETA Working Paper Series WP 166. Eindhoven, NL: Eindhoven University of Technology.
92. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Williams, K., Calvo, R. A., & Bell, D. (2003, July 20-24). Autmoatic categorization of questions for a mathematics education service. Paper presented at the 11th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia.
94. Yager, S., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Snider, B. (1986). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 389-397.
95. Zacklad, M. (2004). Processus de documentarisation dans les Documents pour l'Action (DopA): statut des annotations et technologies de la coope'ration associe'es. In Le nume'rique : Impact sur le cycle de vie du document pour une analyse interdisciplinaire. Available from http:// archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic- 00001072.html.
96. Zacklad, M. (2006). Documentarisation processes in documents for action (DofA): The status of annotations and associated cooperation technologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15, 205-228. (Pubitemid 44157790)
97. Zumbach, J., Hillers, A., & Reimann, P. (2003). Supporting distributed problem-based learning: The use of feedback in online learning. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: theory and practice (pp. 86-103). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.