Emergence of learning in computer-supported, large-scale collective dynamics: A research agenda

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages 323-332

  Kapur, Manu ^a   Hung, David ^a   Jacobson, Michael ^a   Voiklis, John ^b   Kinzer, Charles K ^b   Victor, Chen Der Thanq ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT-BASED MODEL; BOTTOM UP; COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS; COMPLEXITY THEORY; EMERGENT ORGANIZATION; EMERGENT PHENOMENON; LARGE GROUPS; LARGE-SCALE NETWORK; ONLINE COMMUNITIES; RESEARCH AGENDA; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; THROUGH THE LENS; WIKIPEDIA;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DYNAMICS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MAMMALS; WEBSITES;

RESEARCH;

EID: 79952191369     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Arthur, W. B. (1990). Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, Feb, 92-99.
2. Axelrod, R. (1997). The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 203-226.
3. Barab, S. & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
4. Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). Dynamics of complex systems. New York: Perseus Publishing
5. Bielaczyc, K. & Collins, A. (in press). Design research: Foundational perspectives, critical tensions, and arenas for action. To appear in J. Campione, K. Metz, & A.M. Palincsar (Eds.) Children's learning in and out of school: Essays in honor of Ann Brown.
6. Carley, K. M., (2002). Computational organizational science: A new frontier. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 19(3), 7257-7262.
7. Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2002). Invariance and universality in social agent-based simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 19(3), 7314-7316.
8. Eidelson, R. J. (1997). Complex adaptive systems in the behavioral and social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 1(1), 42-71.
9. Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, D.C./MA: Brookings Institution Press/MIT Press.
10. Goldstone, R. L. (2006). The complex systems see-change in education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 35-43.
11. Goldstone, R. L., & Janssen, M. A. (2005). Computational models of collective behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 424-429.
12. Gureckis, T. M., & Goldstone, R. L. (under review). Thinking in groups. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Hermann, D. (Ed.) (2003). Narrative Theory and the Cognitive Sciences. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
14. Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
15. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Isenberg, D. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141-1151.
17. Jackson, E. A. (1996). The second metamorphosis of science: A second view (SFI Working Paper No. 96-05-059). Santa Fe Institute.
18. Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34.
19. Jenkins, H., (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York and London: New York University Press
20. Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Kapur, M. (2006). Productive failure. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2006, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
22. Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C., & Black J. (2006). Insights into the emergence of convergence in group discussions. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2006, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
23. Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Koschmann, T., Zemel, A., Conlee-Stevens, M., Young, N., Robbs, J. & Barnhart, A. (2005). How do people learn? Members' methods and communicative mediation. In R. Bromme, F.W. Hesse & H. Spada (2005), op. cit. (pp. 265-294.)
25. Kruse, P., & Stadler, M. (1993). The significance of nonlinear phenomena for the investigation of cognitive systems. In H. Haken & A. Mikhailov (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Nonlinear Complex Systems (pp. 138-160). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag
26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Nowak, A. (2004). Dynamical minimalism: Why less is more in psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 183-192.
28. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69-197). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
29. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
30. Sawyer, K. R. (2005). Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge Building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Education. New York, USA: Macmillan Reference.
32. Schwartz, D.L. (1995). The emergence of abstract dyad representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321-354.
33. Schwartz, D. L. (1999) The productive agency that drives collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 197-218). NY: Elsevier Science.
34. Stahl, G. (2005). Group cognition in computer assisted learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
35. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315-337.
37. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-219.
38. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2004). Dynamical social psychology: Toward coherence in human experience and scientific theory. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Publications.
39. Voiklis, J., Kapur, M., Kinzer, C., & Black, J. (2006). An emergentist account of collective cognition in collaborative problem solving. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science conference 2006, Vancouver, Canada.
40. Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of "small-world" networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.