Embryonic Stem Cell Interactomics: The Beginning of a Long Road to Biological Function

Stem Cell Reviews and Reports

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1138-1154

  Yousefi, Maram ^a,b   Hajihoseini, Vahid ^a,b   Jung, Woojin ^d   Hosseinpour, Batol ^c   Rassouli, Hassan ^a   Lee, Bonghee ^e   Baharvand, Hossein ^a,f   Lee, KiYoung ^d   Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini ^a,g  

^a ROYAN INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^c IRANIAN RESEARCH ORGANIZATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IROST   (Iran)

^d Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Gachon University   (South Korea)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND CULTURE   (Iran)

^g AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF IRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Embryonic stem cells; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Interactomics; Protein protein interactions

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84870368346     PISSN: 15508943     EISSN: 15586804     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-012-9400-9     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Blau, H. M., Brazelton, T. R., & Weimann, J. M. (2001). The evolving concept of a stem cell: entity or function? Cell, 105, 829-841.
2. Baharvand, H., Fathi, A., van Hoof, D., & Salekdeh, G. H. (2007). Concise review: trends in stem cell proteomics. Stem Cells, 25, 1888-1903.
3. Reiland, S., Salekdeh, G. H., & Krijgsveld, J. (2011). Defining pluripotent stem cells through quantitative proteomic analysis. Expert Review of Proteomics, 8, 29-42.
4. Alberts, B. (1998). The cell as a collection of protein machines: preparing the next generation of molecular biologists. Cell, 92, 291-294.
5. Wang, J., Rao, S., Chu, J., et al. (2006). A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature, 444, 364-368.
6. van den Berg, D. L., Snoek, T., Mullin, N. P., et al. (2010). An Oct4-centered protein interaction network in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 6, 369-381.
7. Pardo, M., Lang, B., Yu, L., et al. (2010). An expanded Oct4 interaction network: implications for stem cell biology, development, and disease. Cell Stem Cell 6, 382-395.
8. Ciruela, F. (2008). Fluorescence-based methods in the study of protein-protein interactions in living cells. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 19, 338-343.
9. Fields, S., Song, O. (1989). A novel genetic system to detect protein protein interactions.
10. Zhang, Z., Liao, B., Xu, M., & Jin, Y. (2007). Post-translational modification of POU domain transcription factor Oct-4 by SUMO-1. The FASEB Journal, 21, 3042-3051.
11. Dejosez, M., Krumenacker, J. S., Zitur, L. J., et al. (2008). Ronin is essential for embryogenesis and the pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell, 133, 1162-1174.
12. Dejosez, M., Levine, S. S., Frampton, G. M., et al. (2011). Ronin/Hcf-1 binds to a hyperconserved enhancer element and regulates genes involved in the growth of embryonic stem cells. Genes & Development, 24, 1479-1484.
13. Sun, C., Nakatake, Y., Akagi, T., et al. (2009). Dax1 binds to Oct3/4 and inhibits its transcriptional activity in embryonic stem cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 29, 4574-4583.
14. Tutter, A. V., Kowalski, M. P., Baltus, G. A., et al. (2009). Role for Med12 in regulation of Nanog and Nanog target genes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284, 3709-3718.
15. Ajuh, P., Kuster, B., Panov, K., Zomerdijk, J. C., Mann, M., & Lamond, A. I. (2000). Functional analysis of the human CDC5L complex and identification of its components by mass spectrometry. EMBO Journal, 19, 6569-6581.
16. Wang, Y., Cortez, D., Yazdi, P., Neff, N., Elledge, S. J., & Qin, J. (2000). BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Genes & Development, 14, 927-939.
17. Liang, J., Wan, M., Zhang, Y., et al. (2008). Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell Biology, 10, 731-739.
18. Jarvik, J. W., & Telmer, C. A. (1998). Epitope tagging. Annual Review of Genetics, 32, 601-618.
19. Fritze, C. E., & Anderson, T. R. (2000). Epitope tagging: general method for tracking recombinant proteins. Methods in Enzymology, 327, 3-16.
20. Bauer, A., & Kuster, B. (2003). Affinity purification-mass spectrometry. Powerful tools for the characterization of protein complexes. European Journal of Biochemistry, 270, 570-578.
21. Rigaut, G., Shevchenko, A., Rutz, B., Wilm, M., Mann, M., & Seraphin, B. (1999). A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nature Biotechnology, 17, 1030-1032.
22. Glatter, T., Wepf, A., Aebersold, R., & Gstaiger, M. (2009). An integrated workflow for charting the human interaction proteome: insights into the PP2A system. Molecular Systems Biology, 5, 237.
23. Agell, N., Bachs, O., Rocamora, N., & Villalonga, P. (2002). Modulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by Ca(2+), and calmodulin. Cellular Signalling, 14, 649-654.
24. Forler, D., Kocher, T., Rode, M., Gentzel, M., Izaurralde, E., & Wilm, M. (2003). An efficient protein complex purification method for functional proteomics in higher eukaryotes. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 89-92.
25. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J., & Smith, A. G. (2000). Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genetics, 24, 372-376.
26. Heim, R., & Tsien, R. Y. (1996). Engineering green fluorescent protein for improved brightness, longer wavelengths and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Current Biology, 6, 178-182.
27. Fox, M. S., Clark, A. T., El Majdoubi, M., et al. (2007). Intermolecular interactions of homologs of germ plasm components in mammalian germ cells. Developmental Biology, 301, 417-431.
28. Majoul, I., Straub, M., Duden, R., Hell, S. W., & Soling, H. D. (2002). Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of protein-protein interactions in single living cells by multifocal multiphoton microscopy. Journal of Biotechnology, 82, 267-277.
29. Hink, M. A., Bisselin, T., & Visser, A. J. (2002). Imaging protein-protein interactions in living cells. Plant Molecular Biology, 50, 871-883.
30. Johnsson, N., & Varshavsky, A. (1994). Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 10340-10344.
31. Pelletier, J. N., Campbell-Valois, F. X., & Michnick, S. W. (1998). Oligomerization domain-directed reassembly of active dihydrofolate reductase from rationally designed fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 12141-12146.
32. Rossi, F., Charlton, C. A., & Blau, H. M. (1997). Monitoring protein-protein interactions in intact eukaryotic cells by beta-galactosidase complementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 8405-8410.
33. Hu, C. D., Chinenov, Y., & Kerppola, T. K. (2002). Visualization of interactions among bZIP and Rel family proteins in living cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Molecular Cell, 9, 789-798.
34. Wehrman, T., Kleaveland, B., Her, J. H., Balint, R. F., & Blau, H. M. (2002). Protein-protein interactions monitored in mammalian cells via complementation of beta -lactamase enzyme fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 3469-3474.
35. Galarneau, A., Primeau, M., Trudeau, L. E., & Michnick, S. W. (2002). Beta-lactamase protein fragment complementation assays as in vivo and in vitro sensors of protein protein interactions. Nature Biotechnology, 20, 619-622.
36. Spotts, J. M., Dolmetsch, R. E., & Greenberg, M. E. (2002). Time-lapse imaging of a dynamic phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interaction in mammalian cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 15142-15147.
37. Paulmurugan, R., Umezawa, Y., & Gambhir, S. S. (2002). Noninvasive imaging of protein-protein interactions in living subjects by using reporter protein complementation and reconstitution strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 15608-15613.
38. Remy, I., & Michnick, S. W. (2006). A highly sensitive protein-protein interaction assay based on Gaussia luciferase. Nature Methods, 3, 977-979.
39. Kerppola, T. K. (2006). Visualization of molecular interactions by fluorescence complementation. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7, 449-456.
40. Hu, C. D., & Kerppola, T. K. (2003). Simultaneous visualization of multiple protein interactions in living cells using multicolor fluorescence complementation analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 539-545.
41. Ren, X., Vincenz, C., & Kerppola, T. K. (2008). Changes in the distributions and dynamics of polycomb repressive complexes during embryonic stem cell differentiation. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 28, 2884-2895.
42. Leuchowius, K. J., Weibrecht, I., Landegren, U., Gedda, L., & Soderberg, O. (2009). Flow cytometric in situ proximity ligation analyses of protein interactions and post-translational modification of the epidermal growth factor receptor family. Cytometry. Part A, 75, 833-839.
43. Vermeer, M. H., van Doorn, R., Dijkman, R., et al. (2008). Novel and highly recurrent chromosomal alterations in Sezary syndrome. Cancer Research, 68, 2689-2698.
44. Johansson, H., Simonsson, S. Core transcription factors, Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog, individually form complexes with nucleophosmin (Npm1) to control embryonic stem (ES) cell fate determination. Aging (Albany NY) 2, 815-822.
45. Smith, M. G., Jona, G., Ptacek, J., et al. (2005). Global analysis of protein function using protein microarrays. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 126, 171-175.
46. Zhu, H., Yu, C. Y., & Zhang, H. (2003). Tree-based disease classification using protein data. Proteomics, 3, 1673-1677.
47. Jona, G., & Snyder, M. (2003). Recent developments in analytical and functional protein microarrays. Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics, 5, 271-277.
48. Angenendt, P., Glokler, J., Murphy, D., Lehrach, H., & Cahill, D. J. (2002). Toward optimized antibody microarrays: a comparison of current microarray support materials. Analytical Biochemistry, 309, 253-260.
49. Madoz-Gurpide, J., Wang, H., Misek, D. E., Brichory, F., & Hanash, S. M. (2001). Protein based microarrays: a tool for probing the proteome of cancer cells and tissues. Proteomics, 1, 1279-1287.
50. Knezevic, V., Leethanakul, C., Bichsel, V. E., et al. (2001). Proteomic profiling of the cancer microenvironment by antibody arrays. Proteomics, 1, 1271-1278.
51. Sreekumar, A., Nyati, M. K., Varambally, S., et al. (2001). Profiling of cancer cells using protein microarrays: discovery of novel radiation-regulated proteins. Cancer Research, 61, 7585-7593.
52. Jones, R. B., Gordus, A., Krall, J. A., & MacBeath, G. (2006). A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays. Nature, 439, 168-174.
53. Barker, D., Meade, A., & Pagel, M. (2007). Constrained models of evolution lead to improved prediction of functional linkage from correlated gain and loss of genes. Bioinformatics, 23, 14-20.
54. Jothi, R., Przytycka, T. M., & Aravind, L. (2007). Discovering functional linkages and uncharacterized cellular pathways using phylogenetic profile comparisons: a comprehensive assessment. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 173.
55. Zhou, Y., Wang, R., Li, L., Xia, X., & Sun, Z. (2006). Inferring functional linkages between proteins from evolutionary scenarios. Journal of Molecular Biology, 359, 1150-1159.
56. Pazos, F., & Valencia, A. (2001). Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Engineering, 14, 609-614.
57. Pellegrini, M., Marcotte, E. M., Thompson, M. J., Eisenberg, D., & Yeates, T. O. (1999). Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 4285-4288.
58. Overbeek, R., Fonstein, M., D'Souza, M., Pusch, G. D., & Maltsev, N. (1999). The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 2896-2901.
59. Oyama, T., Kitano, K., Satou, K., & Ito, T. (2002). Extraction of knowledge on protein-protein interaction by association rule discovery. Bioinformatics, 18, 705-714.
60. Pazos, F., Helmer-Citterich, M., Ausiello, G., & Valencia, A. (1997). Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology, 271, 511-523.
61. Pazos, F., & Valencia, A. (2002). In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins, 47, 219-227.
62. Juan, D., Pazos, F., & Valencia, A. (2008). Co-evolution and co-adaptation in protein networks. FEBS Letters, 582, 1225-1230.
63. Shen, J., Zhang, J., Luo, X., et al. (2007). Predicting protein-protein interactions based only on sequences information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 4337-4341.
64. Hui, S., Bader, G. D. Proteome scanning to predict PDZ domain interactions using support vector machines. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 507.
65. Aytuna, A. S., Gursoy, A., & Keskin, O. (2005). Prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining structure and sequence conservation in protein interfaces. Bioinformatics, 21, 2850-2855.
66. Hue, M., Riffle, M., Vert, J. P., Noble, W. S. Large-scale prediction of protein-protein interactions from structures. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 144.
67. Singh, R., Park, D., Xu, J., Hosur, R., Berger, B. Struct2Net: a web service to predict protein-protein interactions using a structure-based approach. Nucleic Acids Research, 38, W508-515.
68. Panchenko, A. P. (2008) T Protein-protein Interactions and Networks 68-77.
69. Nguyen, T. P., & Ho, T. B. (2006). Discovering signal transduction networks using signaling domain-domain interactions. Genome Informatics, 17, 35-45.
70. Singhal, M., & Resat, H. (2007). A domain-based approach to predict protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 199.
71. Riley, R., Lee, C., Sabatti, C., & Eisenberg, D. (2005). Inferring protein domain interactions from databases of interacting proteins. Genome Biology, 6, R89.
72. Pawson, T., & Nash, P. (2003). Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science, 300, 445-452.
73. Sprinzak, E., & Margalit, H. (2001). Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology, 311, 681-692.
74. Deng, M., Mehta, S., Sun, F., & Chen, T. (2002). Inferring domain-domain interactions from protein-protein interactions. Genome Research, 12, 1540-1548.
75. Lee, H., Deng, M., Sun, F., & Chen, T. (2006). An integrated approach to the prediction of domain-domain interactions. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 269.
76. Wang, H., Segal, E., Ben-Hur, A., Li, Q. R., Vidal, M., & Koller, D. (2007). InSite: a computational method for identifying protein-protein interaction binding sites on a proteome-wide scale. Genome Biology, 8, R192.
77. Bock, J. R., & Gough, D. A. (2001). Predicting protein-protein interactions from primary structure. Bioinformatics, 17, 455-460.
78. Gomez, S. M., Rzhetsky, A. (2002) Towards the prediction of complete protein-protein interaction networks. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 413-424.
79. Nye, T. M., Berzuini, C., Gilks, W. R., Babu, M. M., & Teichmann, S. A. (2005). Statistical analysis of domains in interacting protein pairs. Bioinformatics, 21, 993-1001.
80. Neduva, V., Linding, R., Su-Angrand, I., et al. (2005). Systematic discovery of new recognition peptides mediating protein interaction networks. PLoS Biology, 3, e405.
81. Davey, N. E., Shields, D. C., & Edwards, R. J. (2006). SLiMDisc: short, linear motif discovery, correcting for common evolutionary descent. Nucleic Acids Research, 34, 3546-3554.
82. Fields, S., & Song, O. (1989). A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature, 340, 245-246.
83. Bu, D., Zhao, Y., Cai, L., et al. (2003). Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 2443-2450.
84. Lee, I., Date, S. V., Adai, A. T., & Marcotte, E. M. (2004). A probabilistic functional network of yeast genes. Science, 306, 1555-1558.
85. Yeger-Lotem, E., & Margalit, H. (2003). Detection of regulatory circuits by integrating the cellular networks of protein-protein interactions and transcription regulation. Nucleic Acids Research, 31, 6053-6061.
86. Gomez, M., Alonso-Allende, R., Pazos, F., Graña, O., Juan, D., & Valencia, A. (2005). Accessible Protein interaction data for network modeling (3380, pp. 1-13). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag GmbH.
87. Lappe, M., & Holm, L. (2004). Unraveling protein interaction networks with near-optimal efficiency. Nature Biotechnology, 22, 98-103.
88. Jansen, R., Yu, H., Greenbaum, D., et al. (2003). A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science, 302, 449-453.
89. Abe, I., Seki, T., Umehara, K., et al. (2000). Green tea polyphenols: novel and potent inhibitors of squalene epoxidase. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 268, 767-771.
90. Aebersold, R., & Mann, M. (2003). Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 422, 198-207.
91. Agrawal, H. (2002). Extreme self-organization in networks constructed from gene expression data. Physical Review Letters, 89, 268702.
92. Goldberg, D. S., & Roth, F. P. (2003). Assessing experimentally derived interactions in a small world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 4372-4376.
93. Saito, R., Suzuki, H., & Hayashizaki, Y. (2002). Interaction generality, a measurement to assess the reliability of a protein-protein interaction. Nucleic Acids Research, 30, 1163-1168.
94. Saito, R., Suzuki, H., & Hayashizaki, Y. (2003). Construction of reliable protein-protein interaction networks with a new interaction generality measure. Bioinformatics, 19, 756-763.
95. Bader, S., Kuhner, S., & Gavin, A. C. (2008). Interaction networks for systems biology. FEBS Letters, 582, 1220-1224.
96. Mallanna, S. K., Ormsbee, B. D., Iacovino, M., et al. (2010). Proteomic analysis of Sox2-associated proteins during early stages of mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation identifies Sox21 as a novel regulator of stem cell fate. Stem Cells, 28, 1715-1727.
97. Yu, H., Braun, P., Yi{dotless}ldi{dotless}ri{dotless}m, M. A., et al. (2008). High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science, 322, 104-110.
98. Webster, D. M., Teo, C. F., Sun, Y., et al. (2009). O-GlcNAc modifications regulate cell survival and epiboly during zebrafish development. BMC Developmental Biology, 9, 28.
99. Jackson, S. P., & Tjian, R. (1988). O-glycosylation of eukaryotic transcription factors: implications for mechanisms of transcriptional regulation. Cell, 55, 125-133.
100. Loh, Y. H., Wu, Q., Chew, J. L., et al. (2006). The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genetics, 38, 431-440.
101. Lee, K., Chuang, H. Y., Beyer, A., et al. (2008). Protein networks markedly improve prediction of subcellular localization in multiple eukaryotic species. Nucleic Acids Research, 36, e136.
102. Xenarios, I., Salwinski, L., Duan, X. J., Higney, P., Kim, S. M., & Eisenberg, D. (2002). DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 30, 303-305.
103. Bader, G. D., Donaldson, I., Wolting, C., Ouellette, B. F., Pawson, T., & Hogue, C. W. (2001). BIND-The biomolecular interaction network database. Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 242-245.
104. Keshava Prasad, T. S., Goel, R., Kandasamy, K., et al. (2009). Human protein reference database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Research, 37, D767-772.
105. Joshi-Tope, G., Gillespie, M., Vastrik, I., et al. (2005). Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Research, 33, D428-432.
106. Bader, G. D., & Hogue, C. W. (2003). An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 2.
107. Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., et al. (2000). Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet., 25, 25-29.
108. Maere, S., Heymans, K., & Kuiper, M. (2005). BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics, 21, 3448-3449.
109. Nasrabadi, D., Rezaei Larijani, M., Pirhaji, L., et al. (2009). Proteomic analysis of monkey embryonic stem cell during differentiation. Journal of Proteome Research.
110. van Hoof, D., Passier, R., Ward-van Oostwaard, D., et al. (2006). A quest for human and mouse embryonic stem cell-specific proteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 5, 1261-1273.
111. Baharvand, H., Fathi, A., Gourabi, H., Mollamohammadi, S., & Salekdeh, G. H. (2008). Identification of mouse embryonic stem cell-associated proteins. Journal of Proteome Research, 7, 412-423.
112. Chambers, I., Colby, D., Robertson, M., et al. (2003). Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell, 113, 643-655.
113. Mitsui, K., Tokuzawa, Y., Itoh, H., et al. (2003). The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell, 113, 631-642.
114. Nichols, J., Zevnik, B., Anastassiadis, K., et al. (1998). Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell, 95, 379-391.
115. Niakan, K. K., Davis, E. C., Clipsham, R. C., et al. (2006). Novel role for the orphan nuclear receptor Dax1 in embryogenesis, different from steroidogenesis. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 88, 261-271.
116. Pawlak, M. R., Scherer, C. A., Chen, J., Roshon, M. J., & Ruley, H. E. (2000). Arginine N-methyltransferase 1 is required for early postimplantation mouse development, but cells deficient in the enzyme are viable. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 20, 4859-4869.
117. Donohoe, M. E., Zhang, X., McGinnis, L., Biggers, J., Li, E., & Shi, Y. (1999). Targeted disruption of mouse Yin Yang 1 transcription factor results in peri-implantation lethality. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 19, 7237-7244.
118. Voncken, J. W., Roelen, B. A., Roefs, M., et al. (2003). Rnf2 (Ring1b) deficiency causes gastrulation arrest and cell cycle inhibition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 2468-2473.
119. Pirity, M. K., Locker, J., & Schreiber-Agus, N. (2005). Rybp/DEDAF is required for early postimplantation and for central nervous system development. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 25, 7193-7202.
120. Kim, J. K., Huh, S. O., Choi, H., et al. (2001). Srg3, a mouse homolog of yeast SWI3, is essential for early embryogenesis and involved in brain development. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 21, 7787-7795.
121. Okita, K., Kiyonari, H., Nobuhisa, I., Kimura, N., Aizawa, S., & Taga, T. (2004). Targeted disruption of the mouse ELYS gene results in embryonic death at peri-implantation development. Genes to Cells, 9, 1083-1091.
122. Chen, Z. F., Paquette, A. J., & Anderson, D. J. (1998). NRSF/REST is required in vivo for repression of multiple neuronal target genes during embryogenesis. Nature Genetics, 20, 136-142.
123. Cammas, F., Mark, M., Dolle, P., Dierich, A., Chambon, P., & Losson, R. (2000). Mice lacking the transcriptional corepressor TIF1beta are defective in early postimplantation development. Development, 127, 2955-2963.
124. Adham, I. M., Sallam, M. A., Steding, G., et al. (2003). Disruption of the pelota gene causes early embryonic lethality and defects in cell cycle progression. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 23, 1470-1476.
125. Sakaki-Yumoto, M., Kobayashi, C., Sato, A., et al. (2006). The murine homolog of SALL4, a causative gene in Okihiro syndrome, is essential for embryonic stem cell proliferation, and cooperates with Sall1 in anorectal, heart, brain and kidney development. Development, 133, 3005-3013.