Proteome scanning to predict PDZ domain interactions using support vector machines

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Hui, Shirley ^a   Bader, Gary D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE; NEGATIVE INTERACTION; PHAGE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY; POSITIVE INTERACTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS;

BINDERS; BIOLOGY; FORECASTING; GENES; PROTEINS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; PDZ DOMAIN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MICROARRAY;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BINDING SITES; HUMANS; MICE; PDZ DOMAINS; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOME;

EID: 77957737014     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-507     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ponting CP. Evidence for PDZ domains in bacteria, yeast, and plants. Protein Sci 1997, 6:464-468. 10.1002/pro.5560060225, 2143646, 9041651.
2. Pawson T, Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 2003, 300:445-452. 10.1126/science.1083653, 12702867.
3. Dev KK. Making protein interactions druggable: targeting PDZ domains. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004, 3:1047-1056. 10.1038/nrd1578, 15573103.
4. Doorbar J. Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clin Sci 2006, 110:525-541. 10.1042/CS20050369, 16597322.
5. Moyer BD, Denton J, Karlson KH, Reynolds D, Wang S, Mickle JE, Milewski M, Cutting GR, Guggino WB, Li M, Stanton BA. A PDZ-interacting domain in CFTR is an apical membrane polarization signal. J Clin Invest 1999, 104:1353-1361. 10.1172/JCI7453, 409842, 10562297.
6. Songyang Z, Fanning AS, Fu C, Xu J, Marfatia SM, Chishti AH, Crompton A, Chan AC, Anderson JM, Cantley LC. Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains. Science 1997, 275:73-77. 10.1126/science.275.5296.73, 8974395.
7. Tonikian R, Zhang Y, Sazinsky SL, Currell B, Yeh JH, Reva B, Held HA, Appleton BA, Evangelista M, Wu Y, et al. A specificity map for the PDZ domain family. PLoS Biol 2008, 6:e239. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060239, 2553845, 18828675.
8. Wiedemann U, Boisguerin P, Leben R, Leitner D, Krause G, Moelling K, Volkmer-Engert R, Oschkinat H. Quantification of PDZ domain specificity, prediction of ligand affinity and rational design of super-binding peptides. J Mol Biol 2004, 343:703-718. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.064, 15465056.
9. Stiffler MA, Chen JR, Grantcharova VP, Lei Y, Fuchs D, Allen JE, Zaslavskaia LA, MacBeath G. PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science 2007, 317:364-369. 10.1126/science.1144592, 2674608, 17641200.
10. Donnes P, Elofsson A. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC. BMC Bioinformatics 2002, 3:25. 10.1186/1471-2105-3-25, 129981, 12225620.
11. Lehrach WP, Husmeier D, Williams CK. A regularized discriminative model for the prediction of protein-peptide interactions. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:532-540. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti804, 16397010.
12. Yaffe MB, Leparc GG, Lai J, Obata T, Volinia S, Cantley LC. A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways. Nat Biotechnol 2001, 19:348-353. 10.1038/86737, 11283593.
13. Brinkworth RI, Breinl RA, Kobe B. Structural basis and prediction of substrate specificity in protein serine/threonine kinases. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:74-79.
14. Wunderlich Z, Mirny LA. Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2-peptide interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:4629-4641. 10.1093/nar/gkp394, 2724268, 19502496.
15. Eo HS, Kim S, Koo H, Kim W. A machine learning based method for the prediction of G protein-coupled receptor-binding PDZ domain proteins. Mol Cells 2009, 27:629-634. 10.1007/s10059-009-0091-2, 19533032.
16. Chen JR, Chang BH, Allen JE, Stiffler MA, MacBeath G. Predicting PDZ domain-peptide interactions from primary sequences. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26:1041-1045. 10.1038/nbt.1489, 2655215, 18711339.
17. Beuming T, Skrabanek L, Niv MY, Mukherjee P, Weinstein H. PDZBase: a protein-protein interaction database for PDZ-domains. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:827-828. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti098, 15513994.
18. Ben-Hur A, Noble WS. Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7(Suppl 1):S2. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S2, 1810313, 16723005.
19. Lo SL, Cai CZ, Chen YZ, Chung MC. Effect of training datasets on support vector machine prediction of protein-protein interactions. Proteomics 2005, 5:876-884. 10.1002/pmic.200401118, 15717327.
20. Hsu C-W, Chang C-C, Lin C-J. A practical guide to support vector classification. National Taiwan University, Department of Computer Science 2009,
21. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. 2000, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. 2002, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
23. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. , http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm
24. Davis J, Goadrich M. The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML'06); 25 - 29 June, 2006; Pittsburgh 2006, 233-240. ACM.
25. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 2006, 27:861-874.
26. Atchley WR, Zhao JP, Fernandes AD, Druke T. Solving the protein sequence metric problem. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:6395-6400.
27. Hubbard TJP, Aken BL, Ayling S, Ballester B, Beal K, Bragin E, Brent S, Chen Y, Clapham P, Clarke L, et al. Ensembl 2009. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D690-D697. 10.1093/nar/gkn828, 2686571, 19033362.
28. Razick S, Magklaras G, Donaldson IM. iRefIndex: A consolidated protein interaction database with provenance. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:405. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-405, 2573892, 18823568.
29. Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M. BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of Gene Ontology categories in Biological Networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3448-3449. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551, 15972284.
30. Eley L, Yates LM, Goodship JA. Cilia and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2005, 15:308-314. 10.1016/j.gde.2005.04.008, 15917207.
31. Jansen R, Yu HY, Greenbaum D, Kluger Y, Krogan NJ, Chung SB, Emili A, Snyder M, Greenblatt JF, Gerstein M. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science 2003, 302:449-453. 10.1126/science.1087361, 14564010.
32. Li D, Liu WL, Liu ZY, Wang J, Liu QJ, Zhu YP, He FC. PRINCESS, a protein interaction confidence evaluation system with multiple data sources. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:1043-1052. 10.1074/mcp.M700287-MCP200, 18230642.
33. Basdevant N, Weinstein H, Ceruso M. Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study. J Am ChemSoc 2006, 128:12766-12777.
34. Fuentes EJ, Der CJ, Lee AL. Ligand-dependent dynamics and intramolecular signaling in a PDZ domain. J Mol Biol 2004, 335:1105-1115. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.010, 14698303.
35. Hue M, Riffle M, Vert JP, Noble WS. Large-scale prediction of protein-protein interactions from structures. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:114. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-144, 2842260, 20196863.