Computer self-efficacy: A meta-analysis

Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 54-80

  Karsten, Rex ^a   Mitra, Atul ^a   Schmidt, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Behavioral Intention; Computer Anxiety; Computer Attitude; Computer Self Efficacy (CSE); Computer Skill; Meta Analysis; Perceived Ease of Use; Perceived Usefulness

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; COMPUTER ANXIETY; COMPUTER ATTITUDE; COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; COMPUTER SKILL; META-ANALYSIS; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MODERATORS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84870259655     PISSN: 15462234     EISSN: 15465012     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.2012100104     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Adamson, I., & Shine, J. (2003). Extending the new technology acceptance model to measure the end user information systems satisfaction in a mandatory environment: A bank's treasury. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(4), 441-455. doi:10.1080/095373203000136033 (Pubitemid 37396163)
2. Adesina, A. A., & Ayo, C. K. (2010). An empirical investigation of the level of users' acceptance of e-banking in Nigeria. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 15(1), 1-13.
3. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. doi:10.2307/3250951
4. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy - An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876 (Pubitemid 33224539)
5. Aguinis, H., Dalton, D. R., Bosco, F. A., Pierce, C. A., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implication for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37(1), 5-38. doi:10.1177/0149206310377113
6. Ahmad, T. B. T., Madarsha, K. B., Zainuddin, A. M., Ismail, N. A. H., Khairani, A. Z., & Nordin, M. S. (2011). Invariance of an extended technology acceptance model across gender and age group. US-China Education Review, 8(3), 339-345.
7. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
8. Ali, A. S. B. (2005). An assessment of the impact of the fit among computer self-efficacy, task characteristics and systems characteristics on performance and information systems utilization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
9. Amin, H. (2007). Internet banking adoption among young intellectuals. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-13.
10. Ball, D. M., & Levy, Y. (2008). Emerging educational technology: Assessing the factors that influence instructors' acceptance in information systems and other classrooms. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(4), 431-443.
11. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
13. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
14. Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an internet sample: Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(1), 1-15. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00049-9
15. Beas, M. I., & Salanova, M. (2004). Self-efficacy beliefs, computer training and psychological well-being among information and communication technology workers. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1043-1058. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.027
16. Chan, S., & Lu, M. (2004). Understanding internet banking adoption and use behavior: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(3), 21-43. doi:10.4018/jgim.2004070102
17. Chang, L., Chang, S., Ho, C., Yen, D. C., & Chiang, M. (2011). Effects of IS characteristics on e-business success factors of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2129-2140. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.007
18. Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26-33. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2001010103 (Pubitemid 33761513)
19. Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. H. (2001). Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 699-719. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x
20. Chiu, C., & Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45(3), 194-201. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003 (Pubitemid 351491532)
21. Chou, H. (2001). Effects of training method and computer anxiety on training and self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 51-69. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00035-2 (Pubitemid 32086883)
22. Chou, H., & Wang, T. (2000). The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 455-472. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00040-2 (Pubitemid 32022516)
23. Chou, S., & Chen, P. (2009). The influence of individual differences on continuance intentions of enterprise resource planning (ERP). International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 484-496. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.01.001
24. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158. doi:10.2307/249749
25. Compeau, D. R., Gravill, J., Haggerty, N., & Kelley, H. (2006). Computer self-efficacy: A review. In Zhang, P., & Galletta, D. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 225-261). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
26. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. doi:10.2307/249688
27. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.118 (Pubitemid 126102975)
28. Conrad, A. M., & Munro, D. (2008). Relationships between computer self-efficacy, technology, attitudes and anxiety: Development of the computer technology use scale (CTUS). Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(1), 51-73.
29. Czaja, S. J., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Nair, S. N., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333-352. doi:10.1037/0882- 7974.21.2.333 (Pubitemid 44212031)
30. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 318-340. doi:10.2307/249008
31. Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19-45. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040 (Pubitemid 126359963)
32. de Guinea, A. O., & Webster, J. (2011). Are we talking about the task or the computer? An examination of the associated domains of task-specific and computer self-efficacies. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 978-987. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.002
33. Downey, J. P., Rainer, R. K., & Bartczak, S. E. (2008). Explicating computer self-efficacy relationships: Generality and the overstated case of specificity matching. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 20(3), 22-40. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2008070102
34. Downey, J. P., & Smith, L. A. (2011). The role of computer attitudes in enhancing computer competence in training. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 23(3), 81-100. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2011070105
35. Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 521-535. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00006-7 (Pubitemid 34771853)
36. Fagan, M. H., Neill, S., & Wooldridge, B. R. (2003). An empirical investigation into the relationship between computer self-efficacy, anxiety, experience, support and usage. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 95-104. (Pubitemid 38194189)
37. Ferdousi, B., & Levy, Y. (2010). Development and validation of a model to investigate the impact of individual factors on instructors' intention to use e-learning systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6, 1-21.
38. Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884-891. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.884
39. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Glassberg, B. C. (2000). Individual use of Web technology: A reconceptualization and empirical test of the technology acceptance model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
41. Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yuecheng, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for Web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365-374.
42. Greenberg, J. (1987). The college sophomore as guinea pig: Setting the record straight. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 157-159.
43. Guriting, P., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Borneo online banking: Evaluating customer perceptions and behavioural intention. Management Research News, 29(1-2), 6-15. doi:10.1108/01409170610645402
44. Hasan, B. (1998). The influence of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectations on computer training effectiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Mississippi, Lafayette, MS.
45. Hasan, B. (2006a). Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance. Information & Management, 43(5), 565-571. doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.11.005 (Pubitemid 44038129)
46. Hasan, B. (2006b). Effectiveness of computer training: The role of multilevel computer self-efficacy. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(1), 50-68. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2006010103
47. Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Information Resources Management Journal, 20(3), 76-88. doi:10.4018/irmj.2007070106
48. Hasan, B., & Ahmed, M. U. (2010). A path analysis of the impact of application-specific perceptions of computer self-efficacy and anxiety on technology acceptance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 22(3), 82-95. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2010070105
49. Hasan, B., & Ali, J. (2006). The impact of general and system-specific self-efficacy on computer training learning and reactions. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, 9(1), 17-35.
50. Havelka, D. (2003). Predicting software self efficacy among business students: A preliminary assessment. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(2), 145-152.
51. Heilman, G. E., Seshie, G. O., & Greene, B. (2011). Perceived effect of computer self-efficacy on college student computer use. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 11(2), 83-89.
52. Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 307-313. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.307
53. Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers' technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343-367.
54. Hsu, M. K., Wang, S. W., & Chiu, K. K. (2009). Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 412-420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.003
55. Hsu, W. K., & Huang, S. S. (2006). Determinants of computer self-efficacy-An examination of learning motivations and learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3), 245-265.
56. Hung, S. (2003). Expert versus novice use of the executive support systems: An empirical study. Information & Management, 40(3), 177-189. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00003-4 (Pubitemid 35412507)
57. Hung, S., & Liang, T. (2001). Effect of computer self-efficacy on the use of executive support systems. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 101(5-6), 227-236.
58. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 334-349. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.334
59. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Hwang, Y. (2011). Investigating the influence of cultural orientation and innovativeness on ERP adoption. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 14(3), 54-74.
62. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6
63. Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989). A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers. Journal of Management, 15, 373-388. doi:10.1177/ 014920638901500302
64. Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2823-2837. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007 (Pubitemid 46880141)
65. Johnson, R. D. (2005). An empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer-self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy-performance relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 737-758. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.02.008 (Pubitemid 40744159)
66. Johnson, R. D., & Marakas, G. M. (2000). Research report: The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition - Toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 403-417. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.402. 11869
67. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits - self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability - with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80 (Pubitemid 33404730)
68. Kacmar, C. J., Fiorito, S. S., & Carey, J. M. (2009). The influence of attitude on the acceptance and use of information systems. Information Resources Management Journal, 22(2), 22-50. doi:10.4018/irmj.2009040102
69. Kamhawi, E. M. (2008). System characteristics, perceived benefits, individual differences and use intentions: A survey of decision support tools of ERP systems. Information Resources Management Journal, 21(4), 66-84. doi:10.4018/irmj.2008100104
70. Karsten, R., & Roth, R. M. (1998). The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(1), 14-25.
71. Karsten, R., & Schmidt, D. (2008). Business student computer self-efficacy: Ten years later. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(4), 445-453.
72. Kim, S. C. (1995). An empirical analysis of adoption and utilization of telecommunication technology: A prospective study of electronic mail systems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NB.
73. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740-755. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 (Pubitemid 44287241)
74. Klein, R. (2007). An empirical examination of patient-physician portal acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 751-760. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000719
75. Koch, S. C., Muller, S. M., & Sieverding, M. (2008). Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1795-1803. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.007
76. Kwahk, K., & Ahn, H. (2010). Moderating effects of localization differences on ERP use: A socio-technical systems perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 186-198. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.006
77. Lai, J. (2009). How reward, computer self-efficacy, and perceived power security affect knowledge management systems success: An empirical investigation in high-tech companies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 332-347. doi:10.1002/asi.20982
78. Lancaster, M. (2001). A study of the extent and nature of computer use in Saskatchewan high school accounting instruction, and some of the factors that influence computer use (Unpublished master thesis). University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.
79. Lee, C., Cheng, H. K., & Cheng, H. (2007). An empirical study of mobile commerce in insurance industry: Task-technology fit and individual differences. Decision Support Systems, 43, 95-110. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.008 (Pubitemid 46073230)
80. Lee, H., Choi, S. Y., & Kang, Y. S. (2009). Formation of e-satisfaction and repurchase intention: Moderating roles of computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7848-7859. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.005
81. Lee, Y. (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5), 517-547. doi:10.1108/14684520610706406
82. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y., & Ma, C. (2011). A model of organizational employees' e-learning systems acceptance. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(3), 355-366. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2010.09.005
83. Levy, Y., & Green, B. D. (2009). An empirical study of computer self-efficacy and the technology acceptance model in the military: A case of a U.S. Navy combat information system. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 21(3), 1-23. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2009070101
84. Liu, H. K. (2005). E-business: A study of travel agents in Taiwan and their perceptions of information technology (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.
85. Marakas, G. M., Johnson, R. D., & Clay, P. F. (2007). The evolving nature of the computer self-efficacy construct: An empirical investigation of measurement construction, validity, reliability and stability over time. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(1), 16-46.
86. Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.126
87. Martocchio, J. J. (1992). Microcomputer usage as an opportunity: The influence of context in employee training. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 529-552. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00859.x
88. Martocchio, J. J. (1994). Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 819-825. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.819
89. Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
90. McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. The American Behavioral Scientist, 25(2), 179-210. doi:10.1177/000276428102500205
91. Mcilroy, D., Sadler, C., & Boojawan, N. (2007). Computer phobia and computer self-efficacy: Their association with undergraduates' use of university computer facilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1285-1299. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.004 (Pubitemid 46084893)
92. Minsky, B. D., & Marin, D. B. (1999). Why faculty members use E-mail: The role of individual differences in channel choice. Journal of Business Communication, 36(2), 194-217. doi:10.1177/002194369903600204
93. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(1), 30-38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30
94. Murphy, C. A., Coover, D., & Owen, S. V. (1989). Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 893-899. doi:10.1177/001316448904900412
95. Ong, C., & Lai, J. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
96. Ong, C., Lai, J., & Wang, Y. (2004). Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), 795-804. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.012
97. Pan, C., Sivo, S., Gunter, G., & Cornell, R. (2005). Students' perceived ease of use of an eLearning management system: An exogenous or endogenous variable? Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33(3), 285-307. (Pubitemid 44020446)
98. Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology into educational practice. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1084-1091. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.006 (Pubitemid 351174028)
99. Park, Y. (2003). An empirical evaluation of the factors that impact perceived hypertext usability and user performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Mississippi, Lafayette, MS.
100. Pearson, J. M., & Pearson, A. M. (2008). An exploratory study into determining the relative importance of key criterion Web usability: A multi-criteria approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 115-127.
101. Ranganathan, C., & Jha, S. (2007). Examining online purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: Testing an integrated model. Information Resources Management Journal, 20(4), 48-64. doi:10.4018/irmj.2007100104
102. Rasmussen, J. L., & Loher, B. T. (1988). Appropriate critical percentages for the Schmidt and Hunter meta-analysis procedure: Comparative evaluation of Type I error rate and power. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 683-687. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.683
103. Reed, K. (1998). New age technology and new "aged" workers: The impact of age on computer technology skill acquisition and the influence of computer self-efficacy, age-related beliefs, and change attitudes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NB.
104. Reed, K., Doty, D. H., & May, D. R. (2005). The impact of aging on self-efficacy and computer skill acquisition. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(2), 212-228.
105. Reid, M., & Levy, Y. (2008). Integrating trust and computer self-efficacy with TAM: An empirical assessment of customers' acceptance of banking information systems (BIS) in Jamaica. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-18.
106. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909. 86.3.638
107. Sagie, A., & Koslowsky, M. (1993). Detecting moderators with meta-analysis: An evaluation and comparison of techniques. Personnel Psychology, 46(3), 629-640. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00888.x
108. Salanova, M., Grau, R. M., Cifre, E., & Llorens, S. (2000). Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: The moderating role of computer self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(6), 575-590. doi:10.1016/S0747- 5632(00)00028-5
109. Saleem, H. (2005). Antecedents of computer self-efficacy and behavioral intention to use new IT: An investigation of the role of personality traits (Unpublished master thesis). Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
110. Scott, J. E., & Walczak, S. (2009). Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Information & Management, 46(4), 221-232. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008. 10.003
111. Seyal, A. H., & Rahman, N. A. (2007). The influence of external variables on the executives' use of the internet. Business Process Management Journal, 13(2), 263-278. doi:10.1108/14637150710740491
112. Shen, J., & Eder, L. B. (2009). Intentions to use virtual worlds for education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 225-233.
113. Shih, H. (2006). Assessing the effects of self-efficacy and competence on individual satisfaction with computer use: An IT student prospective. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1012-1026. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.025
114. Shivers-Blackwell, S. L., & Charles, A. C. (2006). Ready, set, go: Examining student readiness to use ERP technology. Journal of Management Development, 25(8), 795-805. doi:10.1108/02621710610684268 (Pubitemid 44283385)
115. Smith, S. M. (2002a). The role of social cognitive career theory in information technology based academic performance. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 20(2), 1-10.
116. Smith, S. M. (2002b). Using the social cognitive model to explain vocational interest in information technology. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 20(1), 1-9.
117. Spector, P. E., & Levine, E. L. (1987). Meta-analysis for integrating study outcomes: A Monte Carlo study of its susceptibility to Type I and Type II errors. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 3-9. doi:10.1037/0021-9010. 72.1.3
118. Srite, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Galy, E. (2008). Does within-culture variation matter? An empirical study of computer usage. Journal of Global Information Management, 16(1), 1-25. doi:10.4018/jgim.2008010101
119. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
120. Stone, R. W., & Henry, J. W. (2003). The roles of computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in influencing the computer end-user's organizational commitment. Journal of End User Computing, 15(1), 38-53. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2003010103 (Pubitemid 35425815)
121. Tam, S. (1996). Self-efficacy as a predictor of computer skills learning outcomes of individuals with physical disabilities. The Journal of Psychology, 130(1), 51-58. doi:10.1080/00223980.1996.9914987 (Pubitemid 126420800)
122. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
123. Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
124. Thatcher, J. B., Loughry, M. L., Lim, J., & McKnight, D. H. (2007). Internet anxiety: An empirical study of the effects of personality, beliefs, and social support. Information & Management, 44(4), 353-363. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.11.007 (Pubitemid 46964886)
125. Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewe, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecendents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26(4), 381-396. doi:10.2307/4132314
126. Thatcher, J. B., Zimmer, J. C., Gundlach, M. J., & McKnight, D. H. (2008). Internal and external dimensions of computer self-efficacy: An empirical examination. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(4), 628-644. doi:10.1109/TEM.2008.927825
127. Thompson, R., Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (2006). Intentions to use information technologies: An integrative model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(3), 25-46. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2006070102 (Pubitemid 44499194)
128. Tremblay, D. R. (2000). Resistance to information technology: A psychosocial explanation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
129. Tung, F. (2011). Factors affecting the adoption of online travel websites in Taiwan. Business Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia), 18(1), 149-155.
130. van Braak, J., & Tearle, P. (2007). The computer attributes for learning scale (CALS) among university students: Scale development and relationship with actual computer use for learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2966-2982. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.014 (Pubitemid 46880156)
131. Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1392-1404. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.003
132. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 (Pubitemid 33224535)
133. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
134. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
135. Vuorela, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2004). How undergraduate students meet a new learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(6), 763-777. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.006
136. Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, H., & Tang, T. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501-519. doi:10.1108/09564230310500192 (Pubitemid 37469062)
137. Whitener, E. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals in meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(3), 315-321. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.315
138. Wilfong, J. D. (2006). Computer anxiety and anger: The impact of computer use, computer experience, and self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1001-1011. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.020
139. Yang, H., & Cheng, H. (2009). Creative self-efficacy and its factors: An empirical study of information system analysts and programmers. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 429-438. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.005
140. Zhang, Y., & Espinoza, S. (1998). Relationships among computer self-efficacy, attitudes towards computers, and desirability of learning computing skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 420-438.