Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 51-69

  Chou, H W ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

BEHAVIOR MODELLING; COMPUTER ANXIETY; GENDER DIFFERENCES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0035151937     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00035-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amdt S., Clevenger J., Meiskey L. Students' attitudes toward computers. Computers and the Social Sciences. 1(3-4):1985;181-190.
2. Bandura A. Principles of behavior modification. 1969;Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
3. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. 1986;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJ.
4. Bostrom R.P., Olfman L., Sein M.K. The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quarterly. 14(1):1990;101-109.
5. Brosnan M.J. The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 14:1998;223-234.
6. Cheney P.H., Mann R.I., Amoroso D.L. Organizational factors affecting the success of end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems. 3(1):1986;66-80.
7. Chou H.W., Wang T.B. The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW design training. International Journal of Information Management. 2000;. (in press).
8. Christoph R.T., Schoenfeld G.A. Jr., Tansky J.W. Overcoming barriers to training utilizing technology: the influence of self-efficacy factors on multimedia-based training receptiveness. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 9(1):1998;25-38.
9. Compeau D.R., Higgins C.A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research. 6(2):1995;118-143.
10. Davis D.L., Davis D.F. The effect of training techniques and personal characteristics on training end users of information systems. Journal of Management Information System. 7(2):1990;93-110.
11. Gist M., Rosen B., Schwoerer C. The influence of training method and trainee age on the acquisition of computer skills. Personnel Psychology. 41:1988;255-265.
12. Gist M.E., Schwoerer C., Rosen B. Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74:1989;884-891.
13. Gist M.E., Stevens C.K., Bavetta A.G. Effects of self-efficacy and post training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology. 44:1991;837-861.
14. Hall, E.R., & Freda, J.S. (1982). A comparison of individualized and conventional instruction in Navy technical training. (Training Analytical Evaluation Group Technical Report, No. 117). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center, Training Systems Division.
15. Harrison A.W., Rainer R.K. Jr. The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information systems. 9(1):1992;93-111.
16. Horton, W., Taylor, L., Ignacio, A. & Hoft, N.L. (1996). The Web page design cookbook (pp. 31-50). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Jonassen D.H., Grabowski B.L. Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. 1993;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
18. Kernan M.C., Howard G.S. Computer anxiety and computer attitudes. an investigation of construct and predictive validity issues Educational and Psychological Measurement. 50:1990;681-690.
19. Kirkpatrick D.L. Evaluate training programs: the four levels. 1994;Publishers Group West, Berrett-Koehler, CA.
20. Lewin K. Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. 1951;Harper and Row, New York.
21. Maier N.R. F. Psychology in industrial organizations. 1973;Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
22. Marcoulides G.A. The relationship between computer anxiety and computer achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 4:1988;151-158.
23. Marcoulides G.A., Wang X.B. A cross-cultural comparison of computer anxiety in college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 6(3):1990;251-263.
24. Mawhinney C.H., Saraswat S.P. Personality type, computer anxiety and student performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 8:1991;110-123.
25. Murphy C.A., Coover D., Owen S.V. Development and validation of the computer self-efficacy scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 49:1989;893-899.
26. Nelson R.R., Cheney P.H. Training end users. an exploratory study MIS Quarterly. 11(4):1987;547-559.
27. Pintrich P.R., Cross D.R., Kozma R.B., McKeachie W.J. Instructional psychology. Annual Review of Psychology. 32:1986;611-651.
28. Posner M.I., McLeod P. Information processing models - in search of elementary operations. Annual Review of Psychology, (37). 1982;477-514.
29. Rattanapion V., Gibbs W. Computerized drill and practice. design options and learner characteristics International Journal of Instructional Media. 22(1):1995;59-77.
30. Santhanam R., Sein M.K. Improving end user proficiency effects of conceptual training and nature of interaction. Information Systems Research. 5:1994;378-399.
31. Sein M.K., Bostrom R.P. Individual differences and the training of novice users. Human-Computer Interface. 4(3):1989;197-229.
32. Sein M.K., Bostrom R.P., Olfman L. Training end users to computers: cognitive, motivational, and social issues. Information Systems and Operations Research (INFOR). 25(3):1987;236-254.
33. Simon S.J., Grover V., Teng J.T. C., Whitcomb K. The relationship of information system training methods and cognitive ability to end-user satisfaction, comprehension, and skill transfer. a longitudinal field study Information Systems Research. 7(4):1996;466-490.
34. Simon S.J., Werner J.M. Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches. a field experiment Journal of Applied Psychology. 81(6):1996;648-659.
35. Snow R.E. Individual differences in the design of educational programs. American Psychologist. 41(10):1986;1029-1039.
36. Snow R.E. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. Ackerman P.L., Sternberg R.J., Glaser R. Learning and individual differences. 1989;13-59 Freeman, New York.
37. Szajna B., Mackay J.M. Predictors of learning performance in a computer-user training environment. a path-analytic study International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 7(2):1995;167-185.