Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance

Information Resources Management Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 76-88

  Hasan, Bassam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer self efficacy; Perceived system complexity; Systems acceptance; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT;

BEHAVIORAL INTENTION; COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE; SYSTEM COMPLEXITY; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 51149108343     PISSN: 10401628     EISSN: 15337979     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/irmj.2007070106     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
2. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2) 361-401.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Billings, R., & Wroten, S. (1978). Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticism and suggestions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 677-688.
5. Bonner, S. E. (1994). A model of the effects of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(3), 213-234.
6. Bradford, M., & Florin, J. (2003). Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 205-225.
7. Bryman, D., & Cramer, D. (1994). Quantitative data analysis for social scientists. New York: Routledge.
8. Campbell, D. J. (1986). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1) 40-52.
9. Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26-33.
10. Chen, G., Casper, W. J., & Cortina, T. J. M. (2001). The roles of self-efficacy and task complexity in the relationships among cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and task performance: A meta-analytic examination. Human Performance, 14(3), 209-230.
11. Cheung, W., Chang, M. K., & Lai, V. S. (2000). Prediction of Internet and World Wide Web usage at work: A test of an extended Triandis model. Decision Support Systems, 30(1), 83-100.
12. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
13. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475-487.
14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
15. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
16. Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with tasktechnology fit constructs. Information and Management, 36(1), 9-21
17. Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis's perceived usefulness and easeof- use instruments for decision making: A confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 840-869.
18. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472-485.
19. Hong, W. H., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W. M., & Tam, K. Y. (2001-2002). Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 97-124.
20. Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Internet selfefficacy and electronic service acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 38(3), 369-381.
21. Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91-112.
22. Hu, P. J. H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41(2), 227-241.
23. Hung, S. Y., & Liang, T. P. (2001). Effect of computer self-efficacy on the use of executive support systems. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 101(5), 227-237.
24. Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of selfefficacy on computer usage. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 23(6), 587-605.
25. Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(1), 127-143.
26. Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R. A. (1997). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28(2), 357-389.
27. Kuo, F. Y., Chu, T. H., Hsu, M. H., & Hsieh, H. S. (2004). An investigation of effort-accuracy trade-off and the impact of self-efficacy on Web searching behaviors. Decision Support Systems, 37(3), 331-342.
28. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
29. Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(1), 59-72.
30. Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2005). The role of Internet self-efficacy in the acceptance of web-based electronic medical records. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 17(1), 38-57.
31. Mahmood, M. A., Hall, L., & Swanberg, D. L. (2001). Factors affecting information technology usage: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 11(2), 107-130.
32. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
33. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chinn, W. C. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86-112.
34. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
35. Ong, C. S., Lai, J. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous one e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Information & Management, 41(6), 795-804.
36. Teo, T. S. H., & Pok, S. H. (2003). Adoption of WAPenabled mobile phones among Internet users. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 31(6), 483-498.
37. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-143.
38. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W. H., & Tam, K. R. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(3), 215-242.
39. Van Slyke, C., Lou, H., & Day, J. (2002). The impact of perceived innovation characteristics on intention to use groupware. Information Resource Management Journal, 15(1), 5-12.
40. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
41. Yang, H. D., & Yoo, Y. (2004). It's all about attitude: Revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 38(1), 19-31.