Two dimensions of an inquiry stance toward student-learning data

Teachers College Record

Volumn 114, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Nelson, Tamara Holmlund ^a   Slavit, David ^a   Deuel, Angie ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869386343     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104, 421-455.
2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 1-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
4. Chamberlin, M. T. (2005). Teachers' discussions of students' thinking: Meeting the challenge of attending to students' thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 82, 141-170.
5. Charalambous, C., & Silver, E. A. (2008, January). Shifting from proving to improving: Using assessment as an integral part of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, Tulsa, OK.
6. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249-306). Washington, DC: AERA.
7. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45-58). New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 597-604). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Firestone, W. A., & Gonzalez, R. A. (2007). Culture and processes affecting data use in school districts. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 132-154). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11. Gallimore, R., Ermeling, B. A., Saunders, W. M., & Goldenberg, C. (2009). Moving the learning of teaching closer to practice: Teacher education implications of school-based inquiry teams. Elementary School Journal, 109, 537-553.
12. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
13. Glaser, B. G. (1969). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 216-227). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Grossman, P. L., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942-1012.
15. Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable professional learning communities. In L. Stoll & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 181-195). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
16. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium. Theory Into Practice, 39, 50-56.
17. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Horn, I.S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers' workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181-217.
19. Huberman, M. (1995). The model of independent artisan in teachers' professional relations. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers' work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 11-50). New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the "data-driven" mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 105-131). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
21. Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187-211.
22. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235.
23. Krainer, K., & Wood, T. (Eds.). (2008). International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 3. Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
24. Krebs, A. S. (2005). Analyzing student work as a professional development activity. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 402-411.
25. Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S. & Bryk, A. S. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing schoolbased professional community. In K. S. Louis & S. D. Kruse (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 917-946.
28. Little, J. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teachers College Record, 105, 913-945.
29. Little, J. W. (2007). Teachers' accounts of classroom experience as a resource for professional learning and instructional decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making. The 106th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Vol. 106, pp. 217-240). Malden, MA: Blackwell Synergy.
30. Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M., & Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community, and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 184-192.
31. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press
33. McLaughlin, M. W., & Zarrow, J. (2001). Teachers engaged in evidence-based reform: Trajectories of teachers' inquiry, analysis, and action. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 79-101). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Minstrell, J. (2001). The role of the teacher in making sense of classroom experiences and effecting better learning. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 121-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Moss, P. A., & Peity, P. J. (2007). Introduction: Evidence and decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 1-14). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
37. Nelson, T. H. (2005). Knowledge interactions in teacher-scientist partnerships: Negotiation, consultation, and rejection. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 382-395.
38. Nelson, T. H. (2009). Teachers' collaborative inquiry and professional growth: Should we be optimistic. Science Education, 93, 548-580.
39. Nelson, T. H., & Slavit, D. (2008). Supported teacher collaborative inquiry. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 99-116.
40. Nelson, T. H., Slavit, D., Perkins, M., & Hathorn, T. (2008). A culture of collaborative inquiry: Learning to develop and support professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 110, 1269-1303.
41. Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the "get it or don't" conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 247-255.
42. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
43. Rowan, B., & Miller, R. J. (2007). Organizational strategies for promoting instructional change: Implementation dynamics in schools working with comprehensive school reform providers. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 252-297.
44. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Scribner, J. P., Sawyer, R. K., Watson, S. T., & Myers, V. L. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 67-100.
46. Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257-271.
47. Slavit, D., & Nelson, T. H. (2010). Collaborative teacher inquiry as a tool for building theory on the development and use of rich mathematical tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 201-221.
48. Slavit, D., Nelson T. H., & Kennedy, A. (Eds.) (2009). Perspectives on supported collaborative teacher inquiry. New York: Routledge.
49. Slavit, D., & Roth McDuffie, A. (in press). Self-directed teacher learning in collaborative contexts. School Science and Mathematics.
50. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Talbert, J. (2009). Professional learning communities at the crossroads: How systems hinder or engender change. Proceedings of the Research on Collaborative Teacher Inquiry Conference, Skamania, WA. Retrieved from http://research.vancouver.wsu.edu/stride/skamania-conference-2009
52. Uline, C. L., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Perez, L. (2003). Constructive conflict: How controversy can contribute to school improvement. Teachers College Record, 5, 782-816.
53. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press