Novel method for enumeration of viable Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 cells after single-droplet drying

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 8082-8088

  Perdana, Jimmy ^a   Bereschenko, Ludmila ^a,b,c   Roghair, Mark ^a   Fox, Martijn B ^b   Boom, Remko M ^a   Kleerebezem, Michiel ^a,b   Schutyser, Maarten A I ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NIZO FOOD RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^c KWR WATERCYCLE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TEMPERATURE; DRYING CONDITION; DRYING HISTORY; DRYING METHODS; EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES; FLUORESCENCE STAINING; HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; MALTODEXTRINS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; PROBIOTIC BACTERIA; PROBIOTIC STRAIN; SINGLE DROPLET; SINGLE PARTICLE;

BACILLI; DROPS; EXPERIMENTS; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GLUCOSE; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

DRYING;

AIR TEMPERATURE; BACTERIUM; CELL ORGANELLE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; GLUCOSE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; PROBIOTICS; SURVIVAL;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL LOAD; DESICCATION; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

BACTERIAL LOAD; DESICCATION; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; MASS SCREENING; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM;

EID: 84868611301     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02063-12     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anal AK, Singh H. 2007. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 18:240-251.
2. Ananta E. 2005. Impact of environmental factors on viability and stability and high pressure pretreatment on stress tolerance of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) during spray drying. Technischen Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. http://opus.kobv.de/tuberlin/volltexte/2005/1119/.
3. Ananta E, Volkert M, Knorr D. 2005. Cellular injuries and storage stability of spray-dried Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Int. Dairy J. 15:399-409.
4. Augustin MA, Hemar Y. 2009. Nano-and micro-structured assemblies for encapsulation of food ingredients. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38:902-912.
5. Boulos L, Prévost M, Barbeau B, Coallier J, Desjardins R. 1999. Live/ Dead BacLight: application of a new rapid staining method for direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water. J. Microbiol. Methods 37:77-86.
6. Bron PA, van Baarlen P, Kleerebezem M. 2012. Emerging molecular insights into the interaction between probiotics and the host intestinal mucosa. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10:66-78.
7. Chávez BE, Ledeboer AM. 2007. Drying of probiotics: optimization of formulation and process to enhance storage survival. Dry Technol. 25: 1193-1201.
8. Corcoran BM, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. 2004. Comparative survival of probiotic lactobacilli spray-dried in the presence of prebiotic substances. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96:1024-1039.
9. Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Hoekstra FA. 1989. Phase transitions and permeability changes in dry membranes during rehydration. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 21:77-91.
10. Desmond C, Ross RP, O'Callaghan E, Fitzgerald G, Stanton C. 2002. Improved survival of Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 in spray-dried powders containing gum acacia. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93:1003-1011.
11. FAO/WHO. 2002. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization, London, Ontario, Canada.
12. Fuller R. 1991. Probiotics in human medicine. Gut 32:439-442.
13. Gardiner GE, et al. 2000. Comparative survival rates of human-derived probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and L. salivarius strains during heat treatment and spray drying. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2605-2612.
14. Guilbaud M, Zagorec M, Chaillou S, Champomier-Vergès M-C. 2012. Intraspecies diversity of Lactobacillus sakei response to oxidative stress and variability of strain performance in mixed strains challenges. Food Microbiol. 29:197-204.
15. Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Buitink J. 2001. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 6:431-438.
16. Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Geisen R, Björkroth J, Schillinger U. 2001. Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73:365S-373S.
17. Ingham CJ, et al. 2007. The micro-petri dish, a million-well growth chip for the culture and high-throughput screening of microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:18217-18222.
18. Ingham CJ, van den Ende M, Pijnenburg D, Wever PC, Schneeberger PM. 2005. Growth and multiplexed analysis of microorganisms on a subdivided, highly porous, inorganic chip manufactured from Anopore. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:8978-8981.
19. Jankovic I, Sybesma W, Phothirath P, Ananta E, Mercenier A. 2010. Application of probiotics in food products-challenges and new approaches. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21:175-181.
20. Kleerebezem M, et al. 2003. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:1990-1995.
21. Kleerebezem M, Vaughan EE. 2009. Probiotic and gut lactobacilli and bifidobacteria: molecular approaches to study diversity and activity. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63:269-290.
22. Koster KL, Lei YP, Anderson M, Martin S, Bryant G. 2000. Effects of vitrified and nonvitrified sugars on phosphatidylcholine fluid-to-gel phase transitions. Biophys. J. 78:1932-1946.
23. Mauriello G, Aponte M, Andolfi R, Moschetti G, Villani F. 1999. Spray-drying of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Prot. 62:773-777.
24. Molenaar D, et al. 2005. Exploring Lactobacillus plantarum genome diversity by using microarrays. J. Bacteriol. 187:6119-6127.
25. Parvez S, Malik KA, Ah Kang S, Kim HY. 2006. Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J. Appl. Microbiol. 100: 1171-1185.
26. Peighambardoust SH, Tafti AG, Hejazi MA, Hesari J. 2011. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 22:215-224.
27. Perdana J, Fox M, Schutyser M, Boom R. Mimicking spray drying by drying of single droplets deposited on a flat surface. Food Bioprocess Technol. doi:10.1007/s11947-011-0767-4.
28. Perdana J, Fox MB, Schutyser MAI, Boom RM. 2012. Enzyme inactivation kinetics: coupled effects of temperature and moisture content. Food Chem. 133:116-123.
29. Perdana J, Fox MB, Schutyser MAI, Boom RM. 2011. Single-droplet experimentation on spray drying: evaporation of a sessile droplet. Chem. Eng. Technol. 34:1151-1158.
30. Ranadheera RDCS, Baines SK, Adams MC. 2010. Importance of food in probiotic efficacy. Food Res. Int. 43:1-7.
31. Rokka S, Rantamäki P. 2010. Protecting probiotic bacteria by microencapsulation: challenges for industrial applications. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 231:1-12.
32. Santivarangkna C, Higl B, Foerst P. 2008. Protection mechanisms of sugars during different stages of preparation process of dried lactic acid starter cultures. Food Microbiol. 25:429-441.
33. Santivarangkna C, Kulozik U, Foerst P. 2008. Inactivation mechanisms of lactic acid starter cultures preserved by drying processes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 105:1-13.
34. Schutyser MAI, Perdana J, Boom RM. 2012. Single droplet drying for optimal spray drying of enzymes and probiotics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. [Epub ahead of print.] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.05.006.