Non-catalytic tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors

Immunological Reviews

Volumn 250, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 258-276

  Dushek, Omer ^a   Goyette, Jesse ^a   van der Merwe, P Anton ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Immunoreceptors; Kinetic segregation model; Receptors; Tyrosine phosphatases; Tyrosines kinases

Indexed keywords

ADAPTOR PROTEIN; ALEMTUZUMAB; CD148 ANTIGEN; CD22 ANTIGEN; CD28 ANTIGEN; CD45 ANTIGEN; CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; CYTOKINE RECEPTOR; CYTOPLASM PROTEIN; F ACTIN; FC RECEPTOR; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; JANUS KINASE; LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN; LIGAND; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NON CATALYTIC TYROSINE PHOSPHORYLATED RECEPTOR; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PROTEIN KINASE FYN; PROTEIN SH2; PROTEIN TYROSINE KINASE; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE SHP 1; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE SHP 2; RECEPTOR LIKE PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASE; STAT PROTEIN; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR; TOLL LIKE RECEPTOR; TYROSINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; UNINDEXED DRUG;

ANTIBODY DEPENDENT CELLULAR CYTOTOXICITY; ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SURFACE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; CYTOPLASM; DIMERIZATION; ENZYME MODIFICATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GROWTH INHIBITION; HUMAN; INFECTION; LEUKOCYTE; LIGAND BINDING; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; T LYMPHOCYTE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

HUMANS; IMMUNITY, INNATE; IMMUNOLOGIC SURVEILLANCE; LEUKOCYTES; LIGANDS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN TYROSINE PHOSPHATASES; PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASES; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84867423677     PISSN: 01052896     EISSN: 1600065X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12008     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Barclay AN, Brown MH, Law SKA, McKnight AJ, Tomlinson MG, van der Merwe PA. The Leukocyte Antigen Factsbook. 2nd edn. London: Academic Press, 1997.
2. Evans EJ, et al. The T cell surface - how well do we know it? Immunity 2003;19:213-223.
3. Springer TA. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 1990;346:425-434.
4. Cooper JA, Qian H. A mechanism for Src kinase-dependent signaling by noncatalytic receptors. Biochemistry 2008;47:5681-5688.
5. Mócsai A, Ruland J, Tybulewicz VLJ. The SYK tyrosine kinase: a crucial player in diverse biological functions. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:387-402.
6. Yamada E, et al. Paired receptor systems of the innate immune system. Curr Protoc Immunol 2008;81:A.1X.1-A.1X.25. Chapter 1: Appendix 1X.
7. Lanier LL. DAP10- and DAP12-associated receptors in innate immunity. Immunol Rev 2008;227:150-160.
8. Kuhns MS, Davis MM. Disruption of extracellular interactions impairs T cell receptor-CD3 complex stability and signaling. Immunity 2007;26:357-369.
9. Radaev S, et al. Structural and functional studies of Igalphabeta and its assembly with the B cell antigen receptor. Structure 2010;18:934-943.
10. Call ME, Wucherpfennig KW. Common themes in the assembly and architecture of activating immune receptors. Nat Rev Immunol 2007;7:841-850.
11. Bezbradica JS, Medzhitov R. Role of ITAM signaling module in signal integration. Curr Opin Immunol 2012;24:58-66.
12. Osorio F, Reis e Sousa C. Myeloid C-type lectin receptors in pathogen recognition and host defense. Immunity 2011;34:651-664.
13. Xie Q, et al. Human lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 functions as a dimer in living cells. DNA Cell Biol 2004;23:111-117.
14. Hughes CE, et al. CLEC-2 activates Syk through dimerization. Blood 2010;115:2947-2955.
15. Zhang J-G, et al. The dendritic cell receptor Clec9A binds damaged cells via exposed actin filaments. Immunity 2012;36:646-657.
16. Dennehy KM, Klimosch SN, Steinle A. Cutting edge: NKp80 uses an atypical hemi-ITAM to trigger NK cytotoxicity. J Immunol 2011;186:657-661.
17. Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2007;7:255-266.
18. Veillette A, Dong Z, Pérez-Quintero L-A, Zhong M-C, Cruz-Munoz M-E. Importance and mechanism of "switch" function of SAP family adapters. Immunol Rev 2009;232:229-239.
19. Cannons JL, Tangye SG, Schwartzberg PL. SLAM family receptors and SAP adapters in immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 2011;29:665-705.
20. Le Borgne M, Shaw AS. SAP signaling: a dual mechanism of action. Immunity 2012;36:899-901.
21. Chan AC, Carter PJ. Therapeutic antibodies for autoimmunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:301-316.
22. Brown GD. Immunology: actin' dangerously. Nature 2012;485:589-590.
23. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 2010;141:1117-1134.
24. Yeh TC, Pellegrini S. The Janus kinase family of protein tyrosine kinases and their role in signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci 1999;55:1523-1534.
25. Luo B-H, Carman CV, Springer TA. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu Rev Immunol 2007;25:619-647.
26. Hogg N, Patzak I, Willenbrock F. The insider's guide to leukocyte integrin signaling and function. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:416-426.
27. Vatinel S, et al. An ITIM-like motif within the CCK2 receptor sequence required for interaction with SHP-2 and the activation of the AKT pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1763:1098-1107.
28. El Firar A, Voisin T, Rouyer-Fessard C, Ostuni MA, Couvineau A, Laburthe M. Discovery of a functional immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif in a 7-transmembrane-spanning receptor: role in the orexin receptor OX1R-driven apoptosis. FASEB J 2009;23:4069-4080.
29. Nika K, et al. Constitutively active Lck kinase in T cells drives antigen receptor signal transduction. Immunity 2010;32:766-777.
30. Lowell CA. Src-family kinases: rheostats of immune cell signaling. Mol Immunol 2004;41:631-643.
31. Ingley E. Src family kinases: regulation of their activities, levels and identification of new pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008;1784:56-65.
32. Lin J, Weiss A. The tyrosine phosphatase CD148 is excluded from the immunologic synapse and down-regulates prolonged T cell signaling. J Cell Biol 2003;162:673-682.
33. Zamoyska R. Why is there so much CD45 on T cells? Immunity 2007;27:421-423.
34. Hermiston ML, Zikherman J, Zhu JW. CD45, CD148, and Lyp/Pep: critical phosphatases regulating Src family kinase signaling networks in immune cells. Immunol Rev 2009;228:288-311.
35. Stepanek O, et al. Regulation of Src family kinases involved in T cell receptor signaling by protein-tyrosine phosphatase CD148. J Biol Chem 2011;286:22101-22112.
36. Fuß H, Dubitzky W, Downes CS, Kurth MJ. SRC family kinases and receptors: analysis of three activation mechanisms by dynamic systems modeling. Biophys J 2008;94:1995-2006.
37. Hermiston ML, Xu Z, Weiss A. CD45: a critical regulator of signaling thresholds in immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2003;21:107-137.
38. Barr AJ, et al. Large-scale structural analysis of the classical human protein tyrosine phosphatome. Cell 2009;136:352-363.
39. Allard JF, Dushek O, Coombs D, van der Merwe PA. Mechanical modulation of receptor-ligand interactions at cell-cell interfaces. Biophys J 2012;102:1265-1273.
40. Qi S, Groves JT, Chakraborty AK. Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:6548-6553.
41. Burroughs NJ, Wulfing C. Differential segregation in a cell-cell contact interface: the dynamics of the immunological synapse. Biophys J 2002;83:1784-1796.
42. Weikl TR, Lipowsky R. Pattern formation during T-cell adhesion. Biophys J 2004;87:3665-3678.
43. Coombs D, Dembo M, Wofsy C, Goldstein B. Equilibrium thermodynamics of cell-cell adhesion mediated by multiple ligand-receptor pairs. Biophys J 2004;86:1408-1423.
44. Robert P, Aleksic M, Dushek O, Cerundolo V, Bongrand P, van der Merwe PA. Kinetics and mechanics of two-dimensional interactions between T cell receptors and different activating ligands. Biophys J 2012;102:248-257.
45. Dustin ML, Ferguson L, Chan P, Springer T, Golan DE. Visualization of the CD2 interaction with LFA-3 and determination of the two-dimensional dissociation constant for adhesion receptors in a contact area. J Cell Biol 1996;132:465-474.
46. Zhu D-M, Dustin ML, Cairo CW, Golan DE. Analysis of two-dimensional dissociation constant of laterally mobile cell adhesion molecules. Biophys J 2007;92:1022-1034.
47. Tolentino TP, Wu J, Zarnitsyna VI, Fang Y, Dustin ML, Zhu C. Measuring diffusion and binding kinetics by contact area FRAP. Biophys J 2008;95:920-930.
48. Huppa JB, et al. TCR-peptide-MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature 2010;463:963-967.
49. Huang J, et al. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 2010;464:932-936.
50. Dushek O, Das R, Coombs D. A role for rebinding in rapid and reliable T cell responses to antigen. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5:e1000578.
51. Aleksic M, et al. Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on T cell receptor-peptide MHC confinement time. Immunity 2010;32:163-174.
52. Govern CC, Paczosa MK, Chakraborty AK, Huseby ES. Fast on-rates allow short dwell time ligands to activate T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:8724-8729.
53. Dushek O, et al. Antigen potency and maximal efficacy reveal a mechanism of efficient T Cell activation. Sci Signal 2011;4:ra39-ra39.
54. Goldbeter A, Koshland DE. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981;78:6840-6844.
55. Dushek O, van der Merwe PA, Shahrezaei V. Ultrasensitivity in multisite phosphorylation of membrane-anchored proteins. Biophys J 2011;100:1189-1197.
56. Gunawardena J. Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:14617-14622.
57. Thomson M, Gunawardena J. Unlimited multistability in multisite phosphorylation systems. Nature 2009;460:274-277.
58. Salazar C, Höfer T. Multisite protein phosphorylation - from molecular mechanisms to kinetic models. FEBS J 2009;276:3177-3198.
59. van der Merwe PA, Dushek O. Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:47-55.
60. Pierce SK, Liu W. The tipping points in the initiation of B cell signaling: how small changes make big differences. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:767-777.
61. Coombs D, Kalergis AM, Nathenson SG, Wofsy C, Goldstein B. Activated TCRs remain marked for internalization after dissociation from pMHC. Nat Immunol 2002;3:926-931.
62. Altan-Bonnet G, Germain R. Modeling T cell antigen discrimination based on feedback control of digital ERK responses. PLoS Biol 2005;3:e356.
63. Dushek O, Coombs D. Analysis of serial engagement and peptide-MHC transport in T cell receptor microclusters. Biophys J 2008;94:3447--3460.
64. Das J, et al. Digital signaling and hysteresis characterize Ras activation in lymphoid cells. Cell 2009;136:337-351.
65. Aivazian D, Stern LJ. Phosphorylation of T cell receptor ζ is regulated by a lipid dependent folding transition. Nat Struct Biol 2000;7:1023-1026.
66. Xu C, et al. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell 2008;135:702-713.
67. Fernandes RA, Yu C, Carmo AM, Evans EJ, van der Merwe PA, Davis SJ. What controls T cell receptor phosphorylation? Cell 2010;142:668-669.
68. Zhang H, Cordoba S-P, Dushek O, van der Merwe AP. Basic residues in the T-cell receptor ζ cytoplasmic domain mediate membrane association and modulate signaling. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2011;108:19323-19328.
69. Ma Z, Discher DE, Finkel TH. Mechanical force in T cell receptor signal initiation. Front Immunol 2012;3:217.
70. Munro S. Lipid rafts: elusive or illusive? Cell 2003;115:377-388.
71. Simons K, Gerl MJ. Revitalizing membrane rafts: new tools and insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010;11:688-699.
72. Harder T, Rentero C, Zech T, Gaus K. Plasma membrane segregation during T cell activation: probing the order of domains. Curr Opin Immunol 2007;19:470-475.
73. Lingwood D, Simons K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science 2009;327:46-50.
74. Hashimoto-Tane A, Yokosuka T, Ishihara C, Sakuma M, Kobayashi W, Saito T. T-cell receptor microclusters critical for T-cell activation are formed independently of lipid raft clustering. Mol Cell Biol 2010;30:3421-3429.
75. Eggeling C, et al. Direct observation of the nanoscale dynamics of membrane lipids in a living cell. Nature 2009;457:1159-1162.
76. Davis SJ, van der Merwe PA. The structure and ligand interactions of CD2: implications for T-cell function. Immunol Today 1996;17:177-187.
77. van der Merwe PA, Davis SJ, Shaw AS, Dustin ML. Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition. Semin Immunol 2000;12:5-21.
78. Davis SJ, van der Merwe PA. The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat Immunol 2006;7:803-809.
79. Burroughs NJ, Lazic Z, van der Merwe PA. Ligand detection and discrimination by spatial relocalization: a kinase-phosphatase segregation model of TCR activation. Biophys J 2006;91:1619-1629.
80. Bunnell SC, et al. T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J Cell Biol 2002;158:1263-1275.
81. Varma R, Campi G, Yokosuka T, Saito T, Dustin ML. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 2006;25:117-127.
82. James JR, Vale RD. Biophysical mechanism of T-cell receptor triggering in a reconstituted system. Nature 2012;487:64-69.
83. Johnson KG, Bromley SK, Dustin ML, Thomas ML. A supramolecular basis for CD45 tyrosine phosphatase regulation in sustained T cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10138-10143.
84. Leupin O, Zaru R, Laroche T, Muller S, Valitutti S. Exclusion of CD45 from the T-cell receptor signaling area in antigen-stimulated T lymphocytes. Curr Biol 2000;10:277-280.
85. He X, Woodford-Thomas TA, Johnson KG, Shah DD, Thomas ML. Targeting of CD45 protein tyrosine phosphatase activity to lipid microdomains on the T cell surface inhibits TCR signaling. Eur J Immunol 2002;32:2578-2587.
86. Irles C, Symons A, Michel F, Bakker TR, van der Merwe PA, Acuto O. CD45 ectodomain controls interaction with GEMs and Lck activity for optimal TCR signaling. Nat Immunol 2003;4:189-197.
87. Choudhuri K, Wiseman D, Brown MH, Gould K, van der Merwe PA. T-cell receptor triggering is critically dependent on the dimensions of its peptide-MHC ligand. Nature 2005;436:578-582.
88. Choudhuri K, et al. Peptide-major histocompatibility complex dimensions control proximal kinase-phosphatase balance during T cell activation. J Biol Chem 2009;284:26096-26105.
89. James SE, et al. Antigen sensitivity of CD22-specific chimeric TCR is modulated by target epitope distance from the cell membrane. J Immunol 2008;180:7028-7038.
90. Hombach AA, Schildgen V, Heuser C, Finnern R, Gilham DE, Abken H. T cell activation by antibody-like immunoreceptors: the position of the binding epitope within the target molecule determines the efficiency of activation of redirected T cells. J Immunol 2007;178:4650-4657.
91. Tikhonova AN, et al αβ T cell receptors that do not undergo major histocompatibility complex-specific thymic selection possess antibody-like recognition specificities. Immunity 2012;36:79-91.
92. Xie J, et al. Photocrosslinkable pMHC monomers stain T cells specifically and cause ligand-bound TCRs to be "preferentially" transported to the cSMAC. Nat Immunol 2012;13:674-680.
93. Brzostek J, et al. Ligand dimensions are important in controlling NK-cell responses. Eur J Immunol 2010;40:2050-2059.
94. Köhler K, et al. Matched sizes of activating and inhibitory receptor/ligand pairs are required for optimal signal integration by human natural killer cells. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e15374.
95. Yokosuka T, et al. Spatiotemporal regulation of T cell costimulation by TCR-CD28 microclusters and protein kinase C theta translocation. Immunity 2008;29:589-601.
96. Yokosuka T, et al. Spatiotemporal basis of CTLA-4 costimulatory molecule-mediated negative regulation of T cell activation. Immunity 2010;33:326-339.
97. Yokosuka T, Takamatsu M, Kobayashi-Imanishi W, Hashimoto-Tane A, Azuma M, Saito T. Programmed cell death 1 forms negative costimulatory microclusters that directly inhibit T cell receptor signaling by recruiting phosphatase SHP2. J Exp Med 2012;209:1201-1217.
98. Evans EJ, et al. Crystal structure of a soluble CD28-Fab complex. Nat Immunol 2005;6:271-279.
99. Brown GD. Dectin-1: a signaling non-TLR pattern-recognition receptor. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:33-43.
100. Goodridge HS, et al. Activation of the innate immune receptor Dectin-1 upon formation of a 'phagocytic synapse'. Nature 2011;472:471-475.
101. Zhu B, Davies EA, van der Merwe PA, Calvert T, Leckband DE. Direct measurements of heterotypic adhesion between the cell surface proteins CD2 and CD48. Biochemistry 2002;41:12163-12170.
102. Bayas MV, Kearney A, Avramovic A, van der Merwe PA, Leckband DE. Impact of salt bridges on the equilibrium binding and adhesion of human CD2 and CD58. J Biol Chem 2007;282:5589-5596.
103. Dushek O. Elementary steps in T cell receptor triggering. Front Immunol 2011;2:91.