Combined computational and experimental analysis reveals mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated feedback phosphorylation as a mechanism for signaling specificity

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 23, Issue 19, 2012, Pages 3899-3910

  Hao, Nan ^a   Yildirim, Necmettin ^b   Nagiec, Michal J ^a   Parnell, Stephen C ^c   Errede, Beverly ^a   Dohlman, Henrik G ^a   Elston, Timothy C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE STE 11; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE STE 20; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE STE 7; PHEROMONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; FUS3 GENE; GENE; KSS1 GENE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASES; MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84867174770     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: 19394586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E12-04-0333     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andersson J, Simpson DM, Qi M, Wang Y, Elion EA (2004). Differential input by Ste5 scaffold and Msg5 phosphatase route a MAPK cascade to multiple outcomes. EMBO J 23, 2564-2576. (Pubitemid 38988228)
2. Bao MZ, Schwartz MA, Cantin GT, Yates JR, III, Madhani HD (2004). Pheromone-dependent destruction of the Tec1 transcription factor is required for MAP kinase signaling specificity in yeast. Cell 119, 991-1000. (Pubitemid 40037612)
3. Bardwell L, Cook JG, Voora D, Baggott DM, Martinez AR, Thorner J (1998). Repression of yeast Ste12 transcription factor by direct binding of unphosphorylated Kss1 MAPK and its regulation by the Ste7 MEK. Genes Dev 12, 2887-2898. (Pubitemid 28440147)
4. Baur M, Esch RK, Errede B (1997). Cooperative binding interactions required for function of the Ty1 sterile responsive element. Mol Cell Biol 17, 4330-4337. (Pubitemid 27318109)
5. Behar M, Dohlman HG, Elston TC (2007). Kinetic insulation as an effective mechanism for achieving pathway specificity in intracellular signaling networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 16146-16151. (Pubitemid 350099376)
6. Behar M, Hao N, Dohlman HG, Elston TC (2008). Dose-to-duration encoding and signaling beyond saturation in intracellular signaling networks. PLoS Comput Biol 4, e1000197.
7. Bhalla US, Iyengar R (1999). Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283, 381-387.
8. Bishop AC et al. (2000). A chemical switch for inhibitor-sensitive alleles of any protein kinase. Nature 407, 395-401.
9. Breitkreutz A, Boucher L, Tyers M (2001). MAPK specificity in the yeast pheromone response independent of transcriptional activation. Curr Biol 11, 1266-1271. (Pubitemid 32774083)
10. Brown KS, Hill CC, Calero GA, Myers CR, Lee KH, Sethna JP, Cerione RA (2004). The statistical mechanics of complex signaling networks: nerve growth factor signaling. Phys Biol 1, 184-195. (Pubitemid 44362296)
11. Bruckner S, Kohler T, Braus GH, Heise B, Bolte M, Mosch HU (2004). Differential regulation of Tec1 by Fus3 and Kss1 confers signaling specificity in yeast development. Curr Genet 46, 331-342. (Pubitemid 40069117)
12. Chou S, Huang L, Liu H (2004). Fus3-regulated Tec1 degradation through SCF(Cdc4) determines MAPK signaling specificity during mating in yeast. Cell 119, 981-990. (Pubitemid 40037611)
13. Cirit M, Wang CC, Haugh JM (2010). Systematic quantification of negative feedback mechanisms in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling network. J Biol Chem 285, 36736-36744.
14. Cook JG, Bardwell L, Thorner J (1997). Inhibitory and activating functions for MAPK Kss1 in the S. cerevisiae filamentous-growth signalling pathway. Nature 390, 85-88. (Pubitemid 27494761)
15. Doi K, Gartner A, Ammerer G, Errede B, Shinkawa H, Sugimoto K, Matsumoto K (1994). MSG5, a novel protein phosphatase promotes adaptation to pheromone response in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J 13, 61-70.
16. Errede B, Gartner A, Zhou Z, Nasmyth K, Ammerer G (1993). MAP kinase-related FUS3 from S. cerevisiae is activated by STE7 in vitro. Nature 362, 261-264. (Pubitemid 23093634)
17. Ferrell JEJ, Machleder EM (1998). The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. Science 280, 895-898.
18. Flatauer LJ, Zadeh SF, Bardwell L (2005). Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 25, 1793-1803. (Pubitemid 40280145)
19. Fritsche-Guenther R, Witzel F, Sieber A, Herr R, Schmidt N, Braun S, Brummer T, Sers C, Bluthgen N (2011). Strong negative feedback from Erk to Raf confers robustness to MAPK signalling. Mol Syst Biol 7, 489.
20. Gartner A, Nasmyth K, Ammerer G (1992). Signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires tyrosine and threonine phosphorylation of FUS3 and KSS1. Genes Dev 6, 1280-1292.
21. Good M, Tang G, Singleton J, Remenyi A, Lim WA (2009). The Ste5 scaffold directs mating signaling by catalytically unlocking the Fus3 MAP kinase for activation. Cell 136, 1085-1097.
22. Hao N, Behar M, Parnell SC, Torres MP, Borchers CH, Elston TC, Dohlman HG (2007). A systems-biology analysis of feedback inhibition in the sho1 osmotic-stress-response pathway. Curr Biol 17, 659-667. (Pubitemid 46552242)
23. Hao N, Nayak S, Behar M, Shanks RH, Nagiec MJ, Errede B, Hasty J, Elston TC, Dohlman HG (2008a). Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. Mol Cell 30, 649-656. (Pubitemid 351755062)
24. Hao N, O'Shea EK (2012). Signal-dependent dynamics of transcription factor translocation controls gene expression. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19, 31-39.
25. Hao N, Yildirim N, Wang Y, Elston TC, Dohlman HG (2003). Regulators of G protein signaling and transient activation of signaling: experimental and computational analysis reveals negative and positive feedback controls on G protein activity. J Biol Chem 278, 46506-46515. (Pubitemid 37452223)
26. Hao N, Zeng Y, Elston TC, Dohlman HG (2008b). Control of MAPK specificity by feedback phosphorylation of shared adaptor protein Ste50. J Biol Chem 283, 33798-33802.
27. Komarova NL, Zou X, Nie Q, Bardwell L (2005). A theoretical framework for specificity in cell signaling. Mol Syst Biol 1, 2005.0023.
28. Macia J, Regot S, Peeters T, Conde N, Sole R, Posas F (2009). Dynamic signaling in the Hog1 MAPK pathway relies on high basal signal transduction. Sci Signal 2, ra13.
29. Madhani HD, Fink GR (1997). Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling. Science 275, 1314-1317. (Pubitemid 27114161)
30. Maleri S, Ge Q, Hackett EA, Wang Y, Dohlman HG, Errede B (2004). Persistent activation by constitutive Ste7 promotes Kss1-mediated invasive growth but fails to support Fus3-dependent mating in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24, 9221-9238. (Pubitemid 39313923)
31. Malleshaiah MK, Shahrezaei V, Swain PS, Michnick SW (2010). The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast. Nature 465, 101-105.
32. Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe CA, Mettetal JT, van Oudenaarden A (2009). A systems-level analysis of perfect adaptation in yeast osmoregulation. Cell 138, 160-171.
33. Nagiec MJ, Dohlman HG (2012). Checkpoints in a yeast differentiation pathway coordinate signaling during hyperosmotic stress. PLoS Genet 8, e1002437.
34. Neiman AM, Herskowitz I (1994). Reconstitution of a yeast protein kinase cascade in vitro: activation of the yeast MEK homologue STE7 by STE11. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 3398-3402. (Pubitemid 24130244)
35. Purvis JE, Karhohs KW, Mock C, Batchelor E, Loewer A, Lahav G (2012). p53 dynamics control cell fate. Science 336, 1440-1444.
36. Roberts CJ et al. (2000). Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 287, 873-880. (Pubitemid 30084333)
37. Roberts RL, Fink GR (1994). Elements of a single MAP kinase cascade in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mediate two developmental programs in the same cell type: mating and invasive growth. Genes Dev 8, 2974-2985.
38. Sabbagh W, Jr., Flatauer LJ, Bardwell AJ, Bardwell L (2001). Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. Mol Cell 8, 683-691. (Pubitemid 32946944)
39. Saito H (2010). Regulation of cross-talk in yeast MAPK signaling pathways. Curr Opin Microbiol 13, 677-683.
40. Sprinzak D, Lakhanpal A, Lebon L, Santat LA, Fontes ME, Anderson GA, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Elowitz MB (2010). Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature 465, 86-90.
41. Sturm OE, Orton R, Grindlay J, Birtwistle M, Vyshemirsky V, Gilbert D, Calder M, Pitt A, Kholodenko B, Kolch W (2010). The mammalian MAPK/ERK pathway exhibits properties of a negative feedback amplifier. Sci Signal 3, ra90.
42. Tay S, Hughey JJ, Lee TK, Lipniacki T, Quake SR, Covert MW (2010). Single-cell NF-κB dynamics reveal digital activation and analogue information processing. Nature 466, 267-271.
43. Truckses DM, Garrenton LS, Thorner J (2004). Jekyll and Hyde in the microbial world. Science 306, 1509-1511. (Pubitemid 39564937)
44. Wang X, Hao N, Dohlman HG, Elston TC (2006). Bistability, stochasticity, and oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Biophys J 90, 1961-1978.
45. Wang Y, Abu Irqeba A, Ayalew M, Suntay K (2009). Sumoylation of transcription factor Tec1 regulates signaling of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in yeast. PLoS One 4, e7456.
46. Wang Y, Dohlman HG (2004). Pheromone signaling mechanisms in yeast: a prototypical sex machine. Science 306, 1508-1509. (Pubitemid 39564936)
47. Wang Y, Dohlman HG (2006). Pheromone-regulated sumoylation of transcription factors that mediate the invasive to mating developmental switch in yeast. J Biol Chem 281, 1964-1969. (Pubitemid 43845782)
48. Wang Y, Ge Q, Houston D, Thorner J, Errede B, Dohlman HG (2003). Regulation of Ste7 ubiquitination by Ste11 phosphorylation and the Skp1-Cullin-F-box complex. J Biol Chem 278, 22284-22289. (Pubitemid 36830277)
49. Wu R, Dephoure N, Haas W, Huttlin EL, Zhai B, Sowa ME, Gygi SP (2011). Correct interpretation of comprehensive phosphorylation dynamics requires normalization by protein expression changes. Mol Cell Proteomics 10: M111.009654.
50. Yi TM, Kitano H, Simon MI (2003). A quantitative characterization of the yeast heterotrimeric G protein cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 10764-10769. (Pubitemid 37140102)
51. Yu RC, Pesce CG, Colman-Lerner A, Lok L, Pincus D, Serra E, Holl M, Benjamin K, Gordon A, Brent R (2008). Negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast signalling. Nature 456, 755-761.
52. Yu Y, Dong W, Altimus C, Tang X, Griffith J, Morello M, Dudek L, Arnold J, Schuttler HB (2007). A genetic network for the clock of Neurospora crassa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 2809-2814. (Pubitemid 46327961)
53. Zhan XL, Deschenes RJ, Guan KL (1997). Differential regulation of FUS3 MAP kinase by tyrosine-specific phosphatases PTP2/PTP3 and dual-specificity phosphatase MSG5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 11, 1690-1702. (Pubitemid 27300594)
54. Zhan XL, Guan KL (1999). A specific protein-protein interaction accounts for the in vivo substrate selectivity of Ptp3 towards the Fus3 MAP kinase. Genes Dev 13, 2811-2827.
55. Zhou Z, Gartner A, Cade R, Ammerer G, Errede B (1993). Pheromone-induced signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the sequential function of three protein kinases. Mol Cell Biol 13, 2069-2080. (Pubitemid 23097686)