Input in an institutional setting

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 171-188

  Bardovi Harlig, Kathleen ^a   Hartford, Beverly S ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85041082610     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S027226310001487X     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agar, M. (1985). Institutional discourse. Text, 5, 147–168.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (in press). Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together, In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 7). Urbana: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1990). Congruence in native and nonnative conversations: Status balance in the academic advising session. Language Learning, 40, 467–501.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1991). Saying “No”: Native and nonnative rejections in English. In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 2, pp. 41–57). Urbana: University of Illinois, Division of English as an International Language.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. S. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279–304.
6. Beebe, L., & Takahashi, T. (1989). Do you have a bag?: Social status and patterned variation in second language acquisition. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition (Discourse and Pragmatics, Vol. 1, pp. 103–128). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
7. Bouton, L. (1995, March). Pragmatics and language learning. Plenary address presented at the Ninth International Conference on Pragmatic and Language Learning, University of Illinois, Urbana.
8. Corder, S. P. (1983). A role for the mother tongue, In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 85–97). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
9. Coulmas, F. (1981). “Poison to your soul”: Thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 69–91). The Hague: Mouton.
10. Ellis, R. (1992). Learning to communicate in the classroom: A study of two language learners’ requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 1–23.
11. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic Press.
12. Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1989). Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics (pp. 221–247). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Gleason, J. B., & Perlmann, R. Y. (1985). Acquiring social variation in speech. In H. Giles & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.), Recent advances in language, communication, and social psychology (pp. 86–111). London: Erlbaum.
14. Hartford, B. S. & Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). Closing the conversation: Evidence from the academic advising session. Discourse Processes, 15, 93–116.
15. House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 157–185). The Hague: Mouton.
16. Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247.
17. Kress, G. & Fowler, R. (1979). Interviews. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew (Eds.), Language and control (pp. 63–80). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
18. Linde, C. (1988). The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse. Language in Society, 17, 375–400.
19. Omar, A. S. (1992a). How learners greet in Kiswahili. In L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds.), Pragmatics and language learning (Vol. 2, pp. 59–73). Urbana–Champaign: Department of English as an International Language, University of Illinois.
20. Omar, A. S. (1992b). Opening and closing conversations in Kiswahili: A study of performance of native speakers and learners. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
21. Robinson, M. A. (1992). Introspective methodology in interlanguage pragmatics research. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Japanese as a native and target language (pp. 27–82). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
22. Sakamoto, N., & Naotsuka, R. (1982). Polite fictions: Why Japanese and Americans seem rude to each other. Tokyo: Kinseido.
23. Schachter, J. (1986). Three approaches to the study of input. Language Learning, 36, 211–225.
24. Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118–132.
26. Snow, C. E., Perlmann, R. Y., Gleason, J. B., & Hooshyar, N. (1990). Developmental perspective of politeness: Sources of children’s knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 289–305.
27. Tanaka, N. (1991). Politeness: Some problems for Japanese speakers of English. JALT Journal, 9, 81–102.
28. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P. M., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416–432.