Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (VP-PM): A long-term perspective

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 60, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 1123-1135

  Daneshvar, Samuel A ^a   Rahimtoola, Shahbudin H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

patient; prosthesis; valvular

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART LEFT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MORTALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHETIC VALVE DYSFUNCTION; PROSTHETIC VALVE THROMBOSIS; PULSATILE FLOW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUDDEN DEATH;

EID: 84866405149     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.035     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Albert Einstein http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Albert-Einstein Accessed June 6, 2012
2. S.H. Rahimtoola The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch Circulation 58 1978 20 24
3. E. Braunwald, A. Goldblatt, M.M. Aygen, S.D. Rockoff, A.G. Morrow Congenital aortic stenosis. I. Clinical and hemodynamic findings in 100 patients. II. Surgical treatment and the results of operation Circulation 27 1963 426 462
4. J.R. Tobin, S.H. Rahimtoola, P.E. Blundell, H.J. Swan Percentage of left ventricular stroke work loss A simple hemodynamic concept for estimation of severity in valvular aortic stenosis Circulation 35 1967 868 879
5. R. Garcia Fuster, V. Estevez, I. Rodriguez Prosthesis-patient mismatch with latest generation supra-annular prostheses The beginning of the end? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6 2007 462 469
6. F. Botzenhardt, W.B. Eichinger, R. Guenzinger Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53 2005 226 230
7. M.J. Dalmau, J. Mariagonzalez-Santos, J. Lopez-Rodriguez, M. Bueno, A. Arribas The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic xenograft: a new design with an improved hemodynamic performance Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 5 2006 263 267
8. M.R. Moon, J.S. Lawton, N. Moazami, N.A. Munfakh, M.K. Pasque, R.J. Damiano Jr POINT: prosthesis-patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 2009 278 283
9. D. Shavelle Evaluation of valvular heart disease by cardiac catheterization and angiocardiography C.B.R. Otto, Valvular Heart Disease: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease 2009 Saunders/Elsevier Philadelphia, PA 86 100
10. W.A. Zoghbi, J.B. Chambers, J.G. Dumesnil Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 2009 975 1014 quiz 1082-4
11. T.D. Karamitsos, S.G. Myerson The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of valve disease Prog Cardiovasc Dis 54 2011 276 286
12. E.R. Chafizadeh, W.A. Zoghbi Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation Circulation 83 1991 213 223
13. R. Gorlin, S.G. Gorlin Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I Am Heart J 41 1951 1 29
14. P. Pibarot, J.G. Dumesnil Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention J Am Coll Cardiol 36 2000 1131 1141
15. J.G. Dumesnil, G.N. Honos, M. Lemieux, J. Beauchemin Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography J Am Coll Cardiol 16 1990 637 643
16. A.P. Yoganathan, Y.R. Woo, H.W. Sung, F.P. Williams, R.H. Franch, M. Jones In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 92 1986 198 209
17. P. Pibarot, J.G. Dumesnil, M. Lemieux, P. Cartier, J. Metras, L.G. Durand Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve J Heart Valve Dis 7 1998 211 218
18. P. Pibarot, J.G. Dumesnil, P.C. Cartier, J. Metras, M.D. Lemieux Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation Ann Thorac Surg 71 2001 S265 S268
19. S. Bleiziffer, W.B. Eichinger, I. Hettich Prediction of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch prior to aortic valve replacement: which is the best method? Heart 93 2007 615 620
20. I. Florath, A. Albert, U. Rosendahl, I.C. Ennker, J. Ennker Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch estimated by echocardiographic-determined effective orifice area on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement Am Heart J 155 2008 1135-2
21. M.J. Griffith, C. Carey, D.J. Coltart, B.S. Jenkins, M.M. Webb-Peploe Inaccuracies in using aortic valve gradients alone to grade severity of aortic stenosis Br Heart J 62 1989 372 378
22. S.H. Rahimtoola Perspective on valvular heart disease: an update J Am Coll Cardiol 14 1989 1 23
23. J.H. McAnulty, E.L. Kremkau, J. Rosch, M.T. Hattenhauer, S.H. Rahimtoola Spontaneous changes in left ventricular function between sequential studies Am J Cardiol 34 1974 23 28
24. S. Frank, A. Johnson, J. Ross Natural history of valvular aortic stenosis Br Heart J 35 1973 41 46
25. D. Mohty-Echahidi, J.F. Malouf, S.E. Girard Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position Circulation 113 2006 420 426
26. G. Tasca, Z. Mhagna, S. Perotti Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis Circulation 113 2006 570 576
27. N. Hanayama, G.T. Christakis, H.R. Mallidi Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant Ann Thorac Surg 73 2002 1822 1829 discussion 1829
28. A.D. Milano, M. De Carlo, G. Mecozzi Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up Ann Thorac Surg 73 2002 37 43
29. G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 79 2005 505 510
30. N.J. Howell, B.E. Keogh, V. Barnet Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 2006 10 14
31. J. Mascherbauer, R. Rosenhek, C. Fuchs Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch after valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has no impact on short-term and long-term mortality Heart 94 2008 1639 1645
32. M. Vicchio, A. Della Corte, L.S. De Santo Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly: survival, ventricular mass regression, and quality of life Ann Thorac Surg 86 2008 1791 1797
33. A.G. Morrow, W.C. Roberts, J. Ross Obstruction to left ventricular outflow Current concepts of management and operative treatment Ann Intern Med 69 1968 1255 1286
34. S.H. Rahimtoola Choice of prosthetic heart valve for adult patients J Am Coll Cardiol 41 2003 893 904
35. S.H. Rahimtoola Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults: an update J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 2413 2426
36. 2 J Am Coll Cardiol Img 3 2010 563 566
37. S.H. Rahimtoola Valvular heart disease: a perspective on the asymptomatic patient with severe valvular aortic stenosis Eur Heart J 29 2008 1783 1790
38. E. Ladich, M.B. Michaels, R.M. Jones Pathological healing response of explanted MitraClip devices Circulation 123 2011 1418 1427
39. F.J. Schoen, R.J. Levy Founder's Award, 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, perspectives. Providence, RI, April 28-May 2, 1999. Tissue heart valves: current challenges and future research perspectives J Biomed Mater Res 47 1999 439 465
40. W. Flameng, M.C. Herregods, M. Vercalsteren, P. Herijgers, K. Bogaerts, B. Meuris Prosthesis-patient mismatch predicts structural valve degeneration in bioprosthetic heart valves Circulation 121 2010 2123 2129
41. A. Carpentier Hemodynamic factors affecting the fate of valvular bioprosthesis Circulation 121 2010 2083 2084
42. S.F. Khuri, E.D. Folland, G.K. Sethi Six month postoperative hemodynamics of the Hancock heterograft and the Björk-Shiley prosthesis: results of a Veterans Administration cooperative prospective randomized trial J Am Coll Cardiol 12 1988 8 18
43. L.A. Blauwet, J.F. Malouf, H.M. Connolly Doppler echocardiography of 240 normal Carpentier-Edwards Duraflex porcine mitral bioprostheses: a comprehensive assessment including time velocity integral ratio and prosthesis performance index J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22 2009 388 393
44. L.A. Blauwet, H.M. Burkhart, J.A. Dearani Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of mechanical tricuspid valve prostheses based on early post-implantation echocardiographic studies J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24 2011 414 424
45. S. Bleiziffer, A. Ali, I.M. Hettich Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement Heart 96 2010 865 871
46. S. Nozohoor, J. Nilsson, C. Luhrs, A. Roijer, J. Sjogren Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 85 2008 1310 1317
47. H. Okamura, A. Yamaguchi, H. Nagano Mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent Valve Circ J 76 2012 365 371
48. Y. Sakamoto, K. Hashimoto, H. Okuyama, T. Sasaki, H. Takakura, K. Onoguchi Patient-prosthesis mismatch may be irrelevant after aortic valve replacement with the 19-mm Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or older J Artif Organs 10 2007 206 211
49. M. Vicchio, L.S. De Santo, A. Della Corte Aortic valve replacement with 19-mm bileaflet prostheses in the elderly: left ventricular mass regression and quality of life J Heart Valve Dis 17 2008 216 221
50. A. Garatti, F. Mori, F. Innocente Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm mechanical prostheses: is patient-prosthesis mismatch a relevant phenomenon? Ann Thorac Surg 91 2011 71 77
51. S. Gelsomino, G. Morocutti, G. Masullo Patient-prosthesis mismatch after small-size stentless aortic valve replacement J Card Surg 19 2004 91 97
52. I. Manabe, T. Shindo, R. Nagai Gene expression in fibroblasts and fibrosis: involvement in cardiac hypertrophy Circ Res 91 2002 1103 1113
53. Y. Rudy Conductive bridges in cardiac tissue: a beneficial role or an arrhythmogenic substrate? Circ Res 94 2004 709 711
54. A.C. Nag Study of non-muscle cells of the adult mammalian heart: a fine structural analysis and distribution Cytobios 28 1980 41 61
55. A. Penta de Peppo, J. Zeitani, P. Nardi Small "functional" size after mechanical aortic valve replacement: no risk in young to middle-age patients Ann Thorac Surg 79 2005 1915 1920
56. T. Bove, Y. Van Belleghem, K. Francois, F. Caes, H. Van Overbeke, G. Van Nooten Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30 2006 706 713
57. U. Benedetto, G. Melina, E. Angeloni Moderate chronic kidney disease and left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 2010 881 886
58. F. Weidemann, S. Herrmann, S. Störk Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis Circulation 120 2009 577 584
59. G. Tasca, F. Brunelli, M. Cirillo Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis Ann Thorac Surg 79 2005 1291 1296 discussion 1296
60. M.J. Dalmau, J.M. Gonzalez-Santos, J.A. Blazquez Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39 2011 844 852 discussion 852
61. M.L. Brown, H.V. Schaff, R.M. Suri Regression in left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation is unrelated to prosthetic valve size J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 2011 e5 e9
62. S. Bleiziffer, W.B. Eichinger, I. Hettich Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on exercise capacity in patients after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement Heart 94 2008 637 641
63. E.H. Blackstone, D.M. Cosgrove, W.R. Jamieson Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126 2003 783 796
64. T. Mihaljevic, E.R. Nowicki, J. Rajeswaran Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: implications for decision making J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135 2008 1270 1278 discussion 1278-9
65. C.G. Koch, F. Khandwala, F.G. Estafanous, F.D. Loop, E.H. Blackstone Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement Circulation 111 2005 3221 3229
66. C.M. House, W.B. Nelson, G.V. Raikar, I. Ahmed, R. Dahiya How reliable is an effective orifice area indexed chart? J Heart Valve Dis 18 2009 530 534
67. C. House, W. Nelson, T. Kroshus, R. Dahiya, P. Pibarot Manufacturer provided effective orifice area index charts and the prevention of prosthesis-patient mismatch J Heart Valve Dis 21 2012 107 111
68. R.G. Cohen, E.T. Bourne Industry-generated charts for the selection of stented aortic valve prostheses: clinical tool or marketing ploy? Ann Thorac Surg 91 2011 1001 1002
69. G.T. Christakis, K.J. Buth, B.S. Goldman Inaccurate and misleading valve sizing: a proposed standard for valve size nomenclature Ann Thorac Surg 66 1998 1198 1203
70. S. Daneshvar, S.H. Rahimtoola Predicting occurrence of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Need for more data. Editorial J Heart Valve Dis 2 2012 106
71. G. Huang, S.H. Rahimtoola Prosthetic heart valve Circulation 123 2011 2602 2605
72. M.A. Clavel, J.G. Webb, P. Pibarot Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 1883 1891
73. S.H. Ewe, M. Muratori, V. Delgado Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation J Am Coll Cardiol 58 2011 1910 1918
74. H. Jilaihawi, D. Chin, T. Spyt Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis Eur Heart J 31 2010 857 864
75. A. Tzikas, N. Piazza, M.L. Geleijnse Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the medtronic CoreValve system in patients with aortic stenosis Am J Cardiol 106 2010 255 260
76. C. Giannini, A.S. Petronio, C. Nardi Left ventricular reverse remodeling in percutaneous and surgical aortic bioprostheses: an echocardiographic study J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24 2011 28 36
77. M.A. Clavel, J.G. Webb, J. Rodés-Cabau Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction Circulation 122 2010 1928 1936
78. S.A. Daneshvar, S.H. Rahimtoola Still searching for the elusive Scarlet Pimpernel of today Editorial Eur Heart J 33 2012 1438 1439