Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: Valve size may be irrelevant

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1822-1829

  Hanayama, Naoji ^a   Christakis, George T ^a   Mallidi, Hari R ^a   Joyner, Campbell D ^a   Fremes, Stephen E ^a   Morgan, Christopher D ^a   Mitoff, Peter R R ^a   Goldman, Bernard S ^a  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURVIVAL; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ANTHROPOMETRY; AORTIC VALVE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 0036266543     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03582-8     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus
2. Left ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve replacement
3. St. Jude medical cardiac valves in small aortic roots: Follow-up to sixteen years
4. Multicenter study of stentless valve replacement in the small aortic root
5. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve
6. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status
7. Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position
8. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: Implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis
9. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of 23-mm stentless versus 23-mm stented aortic bioprostheses
10. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient-mismatch
11. Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important?
12. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival following aortic valve replacement
13. Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root
14. Nineteen-millimeter aortic St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis: Up to sixteen years' follow-up
15. Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement
16. Aortic stenosis
17. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association