Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 505-510

  Tasca, Giordano ^a,b   Brunelli, Federico ^a   Cirillo, Marco ^a   Dallatomba, Margherita ^a   Mhagna, Zen ^a   Troise, Giovanni ^a   Quaini, Eugenio ^a  

^a Poliambulanza Hospital   (Italy)

^b POLIAMBULANZA FOUNDATION HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS PATIENT MISMATCH; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MALE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 13244251182     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.042     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Devereux R.B., de Simone G., Ganau A., Roman M.J. Left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in hypertension stimuli, functional consequences and prognostic implications. J Hypertension. 12:1994;S117-127
2. Benjamin E.J., Levy D. Why is left ventricular hypertrophy so predictive of morbidity and mortality? Am J Med Sci. 317:1999;168-175
3. Levy D., Garrison R.J., Savage D.D., Kannel W.B., Castelli W.P. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the framingham heart study. N Engl J Med. 322:1990;1561-1566
4. Orsinelli D.A., Aurigemma G.P., Battista S., Krendel S., Gaasch W.H. Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol. 22:1993;1679-1683
5. Mehta R.H., Bruckman D., Das S., et al. Implications of increased left ventricular mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122:2001;919-928
6. Rahimtoola S.H. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 58:1978;20-24
7. Dumesnil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 16:1990;637-643
8. Dumesnil J.G., Yoganathan A.P. Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 6:1992;S34-38
9. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 36:2000;1131-1141
10. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Lemieux M., Cartier P., Métras J., Durand L.G. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity, and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 7:1998;211-218
11. Del Rizzo D.F., Abdoh A., Cartier P., Doty D.B., Westaby S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 11:1999;114-120
12. Hanayama N., Christakis G.T., Mallidi H.R., et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg. 73:2002;1822-1829
13. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Cartier P.C., Métras J., Lemieux M. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 71:2001;S265-268
14. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 108:2003;983-988
15. Rao V., Jamieson W.R.E., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival following aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 102:2000;III-5-III-9
16. Shiller N.B., Shah P.M., Crawford M., et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2:1989;358-367
17. Devereux R.B., Alonso D.R., Lutas E.M., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy comparison with necroscopy findings. Am J Cardiol. 57:1986;450-458
18. Levy D., Savage D.D., Garrison R.J., Andersson K.M., Kannel W.B., Castelli W.P. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy the Framinghan heart study. Am J Cardiol. 59:1987;956-960
19. González-Juanatey J.R., García-Acuna J.M., Fernandez M.V., et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamic and change in left ventricular mass Implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 112:1996;273-280
20. Sim E.K.W., Orszulak T.A., Schaff H.V., Shub C. Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 8:1994;293-297
21. Ota T., Iwahashi K., Matsuda H., Tsukube T., Ataka K., Okada M. Reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy with St. Jude medical 19 mm valve prosthesis. Angiology. 46:1995;981-987
22. Rohde L.E.P., Zhi G., Araki S.F., Beckel N.E., Lee R.T., Reimond S.C. Gender-associated differences in left ventricular geometry in patients with aortic valve disease and effect of distinct overload subset. Am J Cardiol. 80:1997;475-480
23. Tasca G., Brunelli F., Cirillo M., et al. Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 76:2003;1107-1113
24. De Paulis R., Sommariva L., Colagrande L., et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 116:1998;590-598
25. Lund O., Emmertsen K., Nielsen T.T., et al. Impact of size mismatch and left ventricular function on performance of the St. Jude disc valve after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 63:1997;1227-1234
26. Lund O., Kristensen L.H., Baandrup U., et al. Myocardial structure as a determinant of pre and postoperative ventricular function and long-term prognosis after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 19:1998;1099-1108
27. Muiesan M.L., Rizzoni D., Salvetti M., et al. Left ventricular mass and function are related to collagen turnover markers in essential hypertension. Am J Hyper. 16:2003;895
28. Lund O., Larsen K.E. Cardiac pathology after isolated valve replacement for aortic stenosis in relation to preoperative patient status. Early and late autopsy findings. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 23:1989;263-270
29. Dellegren G., Eriksson M.J., Blange I., Brodin L.A., Radegran K., Sylven C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism influences degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression in patients undergoing operation for aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 84:1999;909-913
30. Verdecchia P., Reboldi G.P., Schillaci G., et al. Circulating insulin and insulin growth factor-1 are independent determinants of left ventricular mass and geometry in essential hyperetension. Circulation. 100:1999;1802-1807
31. Garner C., Lecomte E., Visvikis S., Abergel S., Lathrop M., Soubrier F. Genetic and environmental influences on left ventricular mass a family study. Hypertension. 36:2000;740-746
32. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Jobin J., Cartier P., Honos G., Durand L.G. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve. Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 34:1999;1609-1617
33. Pibarot P., Honos G.N., Durand L.G., Dumesnil J.G. The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol. 12:1996;379-387
34. Milano A.D., De Carlo M., Mecozzi G., et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 73:2002;37-43
35. Bech-Hanssen O., Caidahl K., Wallentin I., Ask P., Wranne B. Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography an in vivo and in vitro study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 122:2001;287-295
36. Castro L.J., Arcidi J.M.J., Fisher A.L., Gaudiani V.A. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root a preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg. 74:2002;31-36
37. Salomon N.W., Okies J.E., Krause A.H., Page U.S., Bigelow J.C., Colburn L.Q. Serial follow-up of an experimental bovine pericardial aortic bioprosthesis. Usefulness of pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Circulation. 84:1991;III-140-III-144
38. Chambers J., Coppack F., Deverall P., Jackson G., Sowton E. The continuity equation tested in a bileaflet aortic prosthesis. Int J Cardiol. 31:1991;149-154
39. Monrad E.S., Hess O.M., Murakami T., Nonogi H., Corin W.J., Krayenbuehl H.P. Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 77:1988;1345-1355
40. Kurnik P.B., Innerfield M., Wachspress J.D., Eldredge W.J., Waxman H.L. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement measured by ultrafast computed tomography. Am Heart J. 120:1990;919-927