Mid-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the 17-mm st. jude medical regent valve

Circulation Journal

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 365-371

  Okamura, Homare ^a   Yamaguchi, Atsushi ^a   Nagano, Hiroshi ^a   Itoh, Satoshi ^a   Morita, Hideki ^a   Naito, Kazuhiro ^a   Yuri, Koichi ^a   Adachi, Hideo ^a  

^a JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Surgery; Valves; Valvular diseases

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; DEATH; DEVICE SAFETY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MALE; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SURVIVAL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART FAILURE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84856241158     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-0733     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Tsuchida M, Kawashiri MA, Tada H, Takata M, Nohara A, Ino H, et al. Marked aortic valve stenosis progression after receiving longterm aggressive cholesterol-lowering therapy using low-density lipoprotein apheresis in a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia. Circ J 2009; 73: 963-966.
2. Spaccarotella C, Mongiardo A, Indolfi C. Pathophysiology of aortic stenosis and approach to treatment with percutaneous valve implantation. Circ J 2010; 75: 11-19.
3. Hara H, Schwartz RS. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circ J 2010; 74: 1513-1517.
4. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003; 108: 983-988.
5. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1131-1141.
6. Hirooka K, Kawazoe K, Kosakai Y. Prediction of postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58: 1626-1630.
7. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613-618.
8. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL, et al; Councils of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 732-738.
9. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, Cartier P, Honos G, Durand LG. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1609-1617.
10. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kennel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561-1566.
11. Milano AD, De CM, Mecozzi G, D'Alfonso A, Scioti G, Nardi C, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: Comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 37-43.
12. González-Juanatey JR, García-Acuña JM, Vega Fernandez M, Amaro Cendón A, Castelo Fuentes V, García-Bengoechea JB, et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: Implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 273-280.
13. Kratz JM, Sade RM, Crawford FA Jr, Crumbley AJ, Stroud MR. The risk of small St. Jude aortic valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 1114-1118.
14. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, White J, Arnold JH, Cosgrove DM. Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 963-974.
15. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Metras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity, and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 211-218.
16. Aoyagi S, Arinaga K, Fukunaga S, Kawano H, Kawara T. Aortic valve replacement with a small mechanical valve prosthesis: A clinical and echocardiographic study of a St Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Jpn Circ J 1998; 62: 244-248.
17. Sommers KE, David TE. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 1608-1612.
18. Castro LJ, Arcidi JM Jr, Fisher AL, Gaudiani VA. Routine enlargement of the small aortic root: A preventive strategy to minimize mismatch. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 31-36.
19. Okamura H, Yamaguchi A, Tanaka M, Naito K, Kimura N, Kimura C, et al. The 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent valve is a valid option for patients with a small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 90-94.
20. Amarelli C, Della Corte A, Romano G, Iasevoli G, Dialetto G, De Santo LS, et al. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in isolated aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 129: 512-517.
21. Takaseya T, Kawara T, Tokunaga S, Kohno M, Oishi Y, Morita S. Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm St. Jude Medical prostheses for a small aortic root in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 2050-2053.
22. Minardi G, Manzara C, Creazzo V, Maselli D, Casali G, Pulignano G, et al. Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 1: 27.
23. Garatti A, Mori F, Innocente F, Canziani A, Gagliardotto P, Mossuto E, et al. Aortic valve replacement with 17-mm mechanical prostheses: Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a relevant phenomenon? Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 71-77.
24. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: Final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1152-1158.
25. Aupart MR, Mirza A, Meurisse YA, Sirinelli AL, Neville PH, Marchand MA. Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis for aortic calcified stenosis: 18-year experience with 1133 patients. J Heart Valve Dis 2006; 15: 768-775.
26. Vicchio M, Della Corte A, De Santo LS, De Feo M, Caianiello G, Scardone M, et al. Tissue versus mechanical prostheses: Quality of life in octogenerians. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 1290-1295.
27. Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, Mathieu P, Dagenais F, Voisine P, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: Influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 39-47.
28. Moon MR, Lawton JS, Moazami N, Munfakh NA, Pasque MK, Damiano RJ Jr. POINT: Prosthesis-patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 278-283.
29. Vicchio M, Della Corte A, De Santo LS, De Feo M, Caianiello G, Scardone M, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the elderly: Survival, ventricular mass regression, and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 1791-1797.
30. Kobayashi Y, Fukushima Y, Hayase T, Kojima K, Endo G. Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement with 16-mm ATS-Advanced Performance valve for small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1195-1199.