Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 10-14

  Howell, Neil J ^a   Keogh, Bruce E ^a   Barnet, Vivien ^a   Bonser, Robert S ^a   Graham, Timothy R ^a   Rooney, Stephen J ^a   Wilson, Ian C ^a   Pagano, Domenico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aortic valve disease; Aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CARDIAC PATIENT; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PATIENT PROSTHESIS MISMATCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; BODY SURFACE AREA; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33744947842     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.03.046     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Pibarot P., Honos G.N., Durand L.G., and Dumesnil J.G. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol 12 (1996) 379-387
2. Blackstone E.H., Cosgrove D.M., Jamieson W.R., Birkmeyer N.J., Lemmer Jr. J.H., Miller D.C., Butchant E., Rizzoli G., Yacoub M., and Chai A. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126 (2003) 783-796
3. Pibarot P., and Dumesnil J.G. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (2000) 1131-1141
4. Hanayama N., Christakis G.T., Mallidi H.R., Joyner C.D., Fremes S.E., Morgan C.D., Mitoff P., and Goldman B. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg 73 (2002) 1822-1829
5. Rao V., Jamieson W.R., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 19 Suppl. 3 (2000) III5-III9
6. He G.W., Grunkemeier G.L., Gately H.L., Furnary A.P., and Starr A. Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root. Ann Thorac Surg 59 (1995) 1056-1062
7. David T.E. Is prosthesis-patient mismatch a clinically relevant entity?. Circulation 111 (2005) 3186-3187
8. Sommers K.E., and David T.E. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg 63 (1997) 1608-1612
9. Perez de Arenaza D., Lees B., Flather M., Nugara F., Husebye T., Jasinski M., Khan M., Henenin M., Gaer J., Guvendik L., Bochenek A., Wos S., Lie M., Van Nooten G., Pennell D., and Pepper J. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Circulation 112 (2005) 2696-2702
10. Dumesnil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., and Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of indexed aortic valve prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 16 (1990) 637-643
11. Dumesnil J.G., LeBlanc M.H., Cartier P.C., Metras J., Desaulniers D., Doyle D.P., Lemieux M., and Raymond G. Hemodynamic features of the freestyle aortic bioprosthesis compared with stented bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 66 6 Suppl. (1998) S130-S133
12. Cartier P.C., Dumesnil J.G., Metras J., Desaulniers D., Doyle D.P., Lemieux M.D., and Raymond G. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 67 (1999) 345-349
13. Westaby S., Huysmans H.A., and David T.E. Stentless aortic bioprostheses: compelling data from the Second International Symposium. Ann Thorac Surg 65 (1998) 235-240
14. Baumgartner H., Khan S., DeRobertis M., Czer L., and Maurer G. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation 82 (1990) 1467-1475
15. Henneke K.H., Pongratz G., and Bachmann K. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics. J Heart Valve Dis 4 (1995) 18-25
16. Tatineni S., Barner H.B., Pearson A.C., Halbe D., Woodruff R., and Labovitz A.J. Rest and exercise evaluation of St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall prostheses. Influence of primary lesion, valvular type, valvular size, and left ventricular function. Circulation 80 3 Pt 1 (1989) I16-I23
17. Barner H.B., Labovitz A.J., and Fiore A.C. Prosthetic valves for the small aortic root. J Card Surg 9 2 Suppl. (1994) 154-157
18. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Jobin J., Lemieux M., Honos G., and Durand L.G. Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position. Am J Cardiol 83 (1999) 542-546
19. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Jobin J., Cartier P., Honos G., and Durand L.G. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 34 (1999) 1609-1617
20. Koch C.G., Khandwala F., Estafanous F.G., Loop F.D., and Blackstone E.H. Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 111 (2005) 3221-3229