Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 71, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2001, Pages

  Pibarot, Philippe ^a   Dumesnil, Jean G ^a   Cartier, Paul C ^a   Métras, Jacques ^a   Lemieux, Michel D ^a  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CALCULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GEOMETRY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; PULMONARY VALVE; STENTS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 0035004531     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)02509-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:637-43.
2. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Métras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity, and mortal ity after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:211-8.
3. David TE. Surgery of the aortic valve. Curr Probl Surg 1999;36:421-504.
4. Yun KL, Jamieson WRE, Khonsari S, Burr LH, Munro AI, Sintek CF. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(Suppl I):I98-102.
5. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-41.
6. Rao V, Jamieson WRE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival following aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2000;102(Suppl 3):III5-9.
7. Medalion B, Blackstone EH, Lytle BW, White J, Arnold JH, Cosgrove DM. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:963-74.
8. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, Cartier P, Honos G, Durand LG. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve. Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1609-17.
9. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, Dumesnil JG. The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol 1996;12:379-87.
10. Yoganathan AP, Woo YR, Sung HW, Williams FP, Franch RH, Jones M. In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92:198-209.
11. Baumgartner H, Khan SS, DeRobertis M, Czer LS, Maurer G. Doppler assessment of prosthetic valve orifice area. An in vitro study. Circulation 1992;85:2275-83.